<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Civil Engineering M.I.C.</title>
    <description>Mutual Improvement Classes are in order to pass on and preserve the skills of the parent topic. In true MIC tradition, these pages are designed to make this knowledge and information available to all.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 18:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 18:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>National Preservation</generator>
    <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/forums/civil-engineering-m-i-c.45/</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://www.national-preservation.com/forums/civil-engineering-m-i-c.45/index.rss"/>
    <item>
      <title>Ten foot or Six foot?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 17:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/ten-foot-or-six-foot.17841/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/ten-foot-or-six-foot.17841/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ralphchadkirk)</author>
      <dc:creator>ralphchadkirk</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[From the NR PTS course, It says that the six foot is the normal distance between lines, and the 10 foot is where they are more apart than the normal.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Elastic Spike Extractor - experiences?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/elastic-spike-extractor-experiences.1153402/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/elastic-spike-extractor-experiences.1153402/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Sheff)</author>
      <dc:creator>Sheff</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We have a considerable amount of flat-bottomed rail on cast base plates spiked to wooden sleepers. When replacing sleepers we really struggle to remove some of the spikes, which appear to be binding in the holes in the plates. We  generally have to resort to forcing a bar through the loop in the spike then using a jack either side on the bar. This is labourious, often bends the bar, and is not without hazard.<br />
<br />
Has anyone got a better method?<br />
<br />
Or have you used any of the proprietary tools...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/elastic-spike-extractor-experiences.1153402/" class="internalLink">Elastic Spike Extractor - experiences?</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interflon</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 19:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/interflon.1419336/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/interflon.1419336/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Breva)</author>
      <dc:creator>Breva</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[We&#039;ve just started using this lubricant on the GWSR PWay. Practical experience is a bit mixed, and the stuff is eye-wateringly expensive.<br />
<br />
Does anyone want to share their own experience with this stuff?<br />
<br />
It should make fishplate greasing a lot easier, and with fewer people. Drawback is that you have to do it more often.<br />
<br />


	<a href="https://www.national-preservation.com/attachments/58255/" target="_blank">View attachment 58255</a>
	
 <br />
<br />
Initially we had practical problems with the application gun getting blocked. Eventually we concluded that the cause was that we hadn&#039;t shaken...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/interflon.1419336/" class="internalLink">Interflon</a>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LMS Junction renewal video</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2019 10:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/lms-junction-renewal-video.1308923/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/lms-junction-renewal-video.1308923/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Sheff)</author>
      <dc:creator>Sheff</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Fascinating stuff .... <iframe width="500" height="300" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vwHKOMq5WzI?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dual Gauge query</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 09:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/dual-gauge-query.1147260/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/dual-gauge-query.1147260/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (MartinBall)</author>
      <dc:creator>MartinBall</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Would it be possible to have dual gauge track with both standard gauge and Irish gauge (using just 3 rails)? In other words, is there room for an extra rail only 6.5&quot; beyond the standard gauge rail?]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Track formations - to excavate or not?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 07:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/track-formations-to-excavate-or-not.1053968/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/track-formations-to-excavate-or-not.1053968/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Rail Rover)</author>
      <dc:creator>Rail Rover</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi All, <br />
<br />
I&#039;m from the Yorkshire Wolds Railway near Driffield in East Yorkshire. We will soon be relaying &#039;the next field&#039; from our existing site in the direction of Wetwang.<br />
<br />
The next field is one of only two in a couple of miles where the old formation (compacted chalk) has been excavated &amp; the field has been returned to arable crops. The others are grasses for grazing, being a few inches of top soil over the formation, so much easier.<br />
<br />
As part of our grant application we have planned to...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/track-formations-to-excavate-or-not.1053968/" class="internalLink">Track formations - to excavate or not?</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lineside clearance questions</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/lineside-clearance-questions.39145/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/lineside-clearance-questions.39145/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (TonyMay)</author>
      <dc:creator>TonyMay</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
Does anyone want to talk about lineside clearance?  In particular what&#039;s the best way to clear heavy shrubbery?  What equipment do you need?  How much does it cost?  How many people do you need?  How fast can a team clear the lineside?  What&#039;s the best way of keeping it down once it&#039;s been cleared?  How does clearance affect the ecology?]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Embankments</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2016 00:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/embankments.10768/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/embankments.10768/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (pseudonym)</author>
      <dc:creator>pseudonym</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The terrible problems caused by the June storms to the SVR have been well discussed elsewhere. The reports on their floodline clearly indicated that many drains were blocked and some collapsed embankments were poorly constructed originally. Other than replaceing all the rubbish fill material is there a way these embankemnts can be stabilised without recourse to piling.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Clearing old culverts...</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 20:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/clearing-old-culverts.685168/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/clearing-old-culverts.685168/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gwilialan)</author>
      <dc:creator>gwilialan</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/signs/arewealone.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":Arewealone:" title="Arewealone    :Arewealone:" />It looks like this area doesn&#039;t get much attention bit hopefully someone can help...<br />
 <br />
OK Lads and Lassies, a challenge for you. I need to clear a variety of old culverts that have probably not been cleared for forty years or more while the trackbed was unused. Now we are at the point of clearing the trackside before opening our new extension I keep finding more...<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:" /><br />
 <br />
The problems I have are:-<br />
1. Usually only one end access as the outfall is often a 3 metre drop straight...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/clearing-old-culverts.685168/" class="internalLink">Clearing old culverts...</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Permitted gradients in terminal stations, runrounds etc.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/permitted-gradients-in-terminal-stations-runrounds-etc.15392/</link>
      <guid>https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/permitted-gradients-in-terminal-stations-runrounds-etc.15392/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (daveannjon)</author>
      <dc:creator>daveannjon</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Can anyone tell me where to find information about maximum gradients allowed in terminal stations with runround loops? I&#039;ve tried searching the Group Standards but not found anything so far. This is for new build btw.<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
Dave]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
