If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Clan Line Farewell 30th June

本贴由 alastair2015-01-14 发布. 版块名称: What's Going On

  1. spicer21

    spicer21 Guest

    I would agree when you put it like that. I'm just surprised none of the other loco owners have done the "sensible" thing. I realise it wouldn't work with some, but presumably the Bulleid Pacifics that have been adapted could have followed the tender mounted option ?
     
  2. John Petley

    John Petley Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2007-10-08
    帖子:
    2,947
    支持:
    2,524
    性别:
    职业:
    Researcher/writer and composer of classical music
    所在地:
    Between LBSCR 221 and LBSCR 227
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Braunton is the only other contender. Regardless of air brakes, 35018 will not be in the frame because it's owned by WCRC and the British Pullman is a DBS job. Also, I seem to recall that the loco to fill in for 35028 must be something with a proven track record on the main line. I hope 35018 will get such a record, but when 35028 bows out, it won't have had much of a chance to prove itself.

    It would be good if whatver steps in during Clan Line's overhaul, more steam runs could be added. When Flying Scotsman was handling these runs,there was talk of upping the steam-hauled pullman trips to about 50. That was a while ago, mind you, but I can't believe that only the British Pullman customers who would like to see a steam loco at the front are those on the lunchtime dining trains and a few that like going to Bath. The itineraries fo the BP seem to have become less exciting than they were a few years ago, although I've no doubt that the food and the pullman experience is as good as ever.

    Pity Jeremy Hosking can't buy Belmond out and re-vamp the product to make use of his steam locos.
     
  3. D7076

    D7076 Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2007-12-21
    帖子:
    1,539
    支持:
    691
    and rename it the Brighton Belle?
     
  4. Enterprise

    Enterprise Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2005-09-09
    帖子:
    5,472
    支持:
    3,302
    Southern Belle would be better for a loco hauled train.
     
  5. Steamage

    Steamage Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2005-09-14
    帖子:
    4,748
    支持:
    1,121
    所在地:
    Oxford
    Talk of 35018 deputising for 35028 on the British Pullman is fanciful nonsense, as you should realise, John. 35018 is part of the Carnforth home fleet, for want of a better name, and therefore, except in exceptional circumstances, would not be operated by DBS. The British Pullman is a DBS operation.

    Edit: Sorry John, I mis-read your post. In fact we agree. (oops!)
     
    Last edited: 2015-01-16
  6. spicer21

    spicer21 Guest

    Who says he can't ?

    I think Tornado has to be the most obvious, and suitable contender, but when is she due back ?

    46233 would be another good one, but no doubt falls foul of the gauging issue on the BBP routes. I guess 70000 could be good as well, but is she powerful enough ?

    Lots of questions, :)
     
  7. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    注册日期:
    2009-05-30
    帖子:
    22,592
    支持:
    22,725
    所在地:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Indeed. And I think that as the contract holder, it is the job of the MNLPS to seek the temporary replacement. That in itself is quite a resposibility given the consequences of making the wrong selection and the need to factor in reliability, status and platform presence. So on that criterion alone, the short list becomes a very short one.
     
  8. mrKnowwun

    mrKnowwun Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-10-22
    帖子:
    4,366
    支持:
    2,823
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    West Byfleet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Platform Presence? If you mean does it look imposing, gleam a lot, and have shiny bits then Tornado fits the bill. Meets the reliability requirement as well.
    If it fits, the Duchess would of course be a contender on all counts.
    Britannia would have no problems with the load, iffy on the status, platform presence is of the tramp sleeping on the station bench level - reliability an issue.
    Oliver Cromwell is Ditto, slightly better platform presence tho.
    If you want hissy fits, edge of your seat drama in abundance, then you would go for Tangmere.
     
    已获得spicer21KentYetiBig Al的支持.
  9. green five

    green five Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2006-04-30
    帖子:
    6,785
    支持:
    2,627
    性别:
    职业:
    Design Draughtsman
    所在地:
    Hampshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    70000 has hauled the VSOE / BP before. I was very annoyed I couldn't get time off to see her on this duty as I understand she put in a superb performance.
    Video of her on the Pullman courtesy of Speed to the West channel:
     
    已获得KristianGWR的支持.
  10. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    60163 has to be favourite, I'd suggest 60009 or 6201 might be good for occasional backup.

    70000 in green with its early emblem and flags (which exist for a Brit) would be nice as would 34046.
     
    已获得26D_M的支持.
  11. Hurricane

    Hurricane Member

    注册日期:
    2013-11-01
    帖子:
    823
    支持:
    307
    性别:
    所在地:
    71A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It strikes me as you are more likely to see Braunton & Britannia on the front of the VSOE than Tornado....... purely from a business point of view LSL can provide spare locomotives if one was to fail a FTR etc
     
    Last edited: 2015-01-16
  12. mrKnowwun

    mrKnowwun Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-10-22
    帖子:
    4,366
    支持:
    2,823
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    West Byfleet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Like they did with Nunney Castle you mean?
     
  13. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2007-08-25
    帖子:
    35,836
    支持:
    22,277
    职业:
    Training moles
    所在地:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    So who provided the backup for 35028 if it failed an FTR exam? DBS with a 67, that's who. Same would happen with 60163. There is so little time between an FTR exam and the actual tour that it's difficult to roster a replacement no matter how big your fleet.
     
    已获得RalphWmaureen的支持.
  14. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    注册日期:
    2009-05-30
    帖子:
    22,592
    支持:
    22,725
    所在地:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Absolutely right. The only chance of a sub from a failed FTR exam is when there just happens to be something in steam from a trip on the previous day. The days of stand by locos have long gone. It happened once, I recall, when Clan Line stepped in straight off a Pullman..
     
    已获得maureen的支持.
  15. green five

    green five Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2006-04-30
    帖子:
    6,785
    支持:
    2,627
    性别:
    职业:
    Design Draughtsman
    所在地:
    Hampshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
     
  16. spicer21

    spicer21 Guest

    Many thanks for that confirmation, no problem then, but as others have said, maybe a question mark over 70000's reliability.

    Another point that increases the likelyhood it will go to Tornado however is the fact only DBS will operate her. From the A1 Trust point of view, it would be a good earner for them, as presumably, there wouldn't be much prospect of work elsewhere now WCRC are operating Steam Dreams trains as well. This could encourage the A1 Trust to do the job at a better price than LSL might want for one of their locomotives.

    In my ideal world, 34092 would do it, but I know that's never going to happen, :)
     
  17. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    注册日期:
    2014-12-08
    帖子:
    19,265
    支持:
    12,517
    性别:
    所在地:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I would think that if 70000 were to be given any of the pulmans she might just turn up as 70004, with full golden arrow regailia re creating the Stewarts lane brits of old if it were on the Surrey Hills
     
    已获得banana patch的支持.
  18. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    注册日期:
    2014-12-08
    帖子:
    19,265
    支持:
    12,517
    性别:
    所在地:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    especially if they had 2 tours lined up one VSOE,the other wasnt, and both locos were air braked, i think, that no one loco should get all the work, if say others were in the stable , for instance, whats to say that an A4 might handle one run, or even a Duchess, dependant on where the tour was going to, ok if you were goung into kent and Sussex,, your limited to what will fit so either 70000 or 34046 would be ok, if it was going up north, then who wouldnt love to see a duchess at the head, with a suitable headboard,
     
  19. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    注册日期:
    2009-05-30
    帖子:
    22,592
    支持:
    22,725
    所在地:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    This is all good speculation about journeys and routes but in practice I get the impression that Belmond sees it very narrowly. A ride in some plush carriages with fine dining plus a steam loco at the front. For that, a run around Surrey is good enough. Anything else (e.g. Bath) turns it into a day out that has a different appeal. Don't forget that the route is probably irrelevant as it's not an enthusiast trip. So we are where we are. VT, RTC etc can do all the creative stuff.
     
    已获得RalphW的支持.
  20. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    One things for sure, the VSOE is going to become more interesting to watch in 2015....
     

分享此页面