If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Un-rebuilding locomotives

Тема в разделе 'Steam Traction', создана пользователем SR.Keoghoe, 10 окт 2015.

  1. SR.Keoghoe

    SR.Keoghoe New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    10 фев 2014
    Сообщения:
    165
    Симпатии:
    39
    Адрес:
    3
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As there seems to be quite a few "New builds", I was wondering if there are any locomotives that are going to be un-rebuilt or could be Un-rebuilt to there original standard, or to be different class locomotive entirely.
    I know the Bluebell are un-rebuilding there Standard class 2 2-6-0 to a tank version 2-6-2T, and there's have been plans to un-rebuild a Merchant Navy class locomotive. Another one could be U class 31806 which could be in-rebuilt to a K class or if not possible a W class.

    Also is the term "Un-rebuilt" correct or should it be original, converted back etc.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  2. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Дата регистрации:
    12 сен 2005
    Сообщения:
    10.146
    Симпатии:
    9.777
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'd err that the transformation of 78059 into 84059 is more conversion that un-rebuilding as the design was never rebuilt

    31806 was originally a "River" class tank engine . To use it as a foundation for anything else is probably a little unfair on the owners

    A Merchant Navy could be restored to original condition and current candidate is 35011

    Both Royal Scots could of course re overhauled into original Parallel boiler configuration

    With costs today I'd prefer that "missing" examples are better built a new than convert an existing loco
     
    Gav106 нравится это.
  3. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    12 май 2006
    Сообщения:
    19.232
    Симпатии:
    17.566
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I suppose the conversion of Maindy Hall to 2999 is possibly a generic unrebuilding of sorts as it reverses the works done to Saint Martin to create a Hall from the Saint.
     
  4. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    10 авг 2006
    Сообщения:
    8.340
    Симпатии:
    2.506
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Адрес:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    One that I've always thought of as a retrograde 'un-rebuild' was that of former GNR Atlantic No. 251 to original condition, i.e. non-superheated and slide valve cylinders. It was only after they had been fitted with piston valves and 32 element superheaters that they made a name for themselves in the 1930s working the Pullman trains. Also, one of them even hauled the 'Coronation' after stepping in to replace a failed A4.
     
  5. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2008
    Сообщения:
    27.803
    Симпатии:
    64.499
    Адрес:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    78059 to 84030 is really a conversion, not "un-rebuilding" (which implies bringing back to original form).

    One I'd like to see would be re-boilering a Stroudley Terrier (and other various work) with a Stroudley boiler to go back to original form. Even more, I'd like to see the Stirling O1 reboilered with a domeless Stirling boiler and round-top cab to create an SER O class, but that would be a retrograde step in performance terms and I suspect has a probability not unadjacent to zero of ever occurring.

    Tom
     
  6. 8126

    8126 Member

    Дата регистрации:
    17 мар 2014
    Сообщения:
    831
    Симпатии:
    976
    Пол:
    Мужской
    I know they did their best work with the superheaters, but they weren't exactly bad locos as built. The bit of the 251 'un-rebuild' that was really retrograde was leaving in a boiler with superheater flues, making a fine mess of the draughting and steaming capability.

    Beachy Head, when finished, should give us an idea of the capability of a late-condition Ivatt Atlantic, since with the exception of the over-size cylinders that's pretty much what she is, and in the case of the boiler being used, exactly so.
     
  7. Gav106

    Gav106 Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    29 мар 2010
    Сообщения:
    1.772
    Симпатии:
    2.170
    Адрес:
    Nantwich, Cheshire
    Is the Y14 on the NNR an un-rebuild? And has Scotsman also been un-rebuilt ?
     
  8. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    8 июн 2014
    Сообщения:
    15.551
    Симпатии:
    11.955
    Адрес:
    Wnxx
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    6023 anyone?
     
  9. david1984

    david1984 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    13 сен 2005
    Сообщения:
    12.910
    Симпатии:
    1.387
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Birmingham
    Won't the Patriot satisfy those after something with a Fowler boiler ?, the rebuilt scots are far more handsome than as built.
     
  10. QLDriver

    QLDriver New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    3 апр 2011
    Сообщения:
    81
    Симпатии:
    40
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Materials Testing
    Адрес:
    California, USA (From Yorkshire)
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Isn't 6229 a prime example? I know it's cosmetic rather than mechanical...
     
  11. GWR Man.

    GWR Man. Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    8 окт 2014
    Сообщения:
    2.259
    Симпатии:
    2.695
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Taunton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    S&DJR 7F back to the large boiler.
     
  12. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    8 сен 2005
    Сообщения:
    4.117
    Симпатии:
    4.821
    Род занятий:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Адрес:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Unrebuilt is quite quite horrible. What's wrong with rebuilt. Otherwise you get in a chain of deplorable syntax in some circumstances.
    The GWR rebuilt some Dukes as Bulldogs. Later on they rebuilt some (later design) Bulldogs as Dukes (and called them a new class to do some dubious swapping of money between accounts). I suppose its theoretically possible that one day 9017 might get rebuilt as a Bulldog. Now what, would that be an unrebuilt rebuild, a rebuilt unrebuild or maybe a rebuild rebuilt, or a rebuilt rebuild?
     
    Last edited: 11 окт 2015
  13. jonathonag

    jonathonag Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    11 май 2006
    Сообщения:
    1.626
    Симпатии:
    3.142
    Род занятий:
    Railway Engineer
    Адрес:
    Cowdenbeath
    In theory, SRPS' favourite J36 No. 65243 'Maude' could be unrebuilt, removing the larger boiler and improved cab protection (among many other smaller differences) that were implemented by Reid during thw rebuilds of the class, giving you an as built Holmes NBR Class C. However, no point in removing a significant chunk of power and useful additions the rebuild gave the loco.
     
  14. Corbs

    Corbs Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    17 июл 2008
    Сообщения:
    1.719
    Симпатии:
    763
    Yes, 'un-rebuilt' implies it wasn't rebuilt in the first place. 'Rebuilt' applies even if the locomotive is reverting back to an earlier form.
     
  15. twr12

    twr12 Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    2 сен 2007
    Сообщения:
    1.659
    Симпатии:
    821
    Non-rebuilt?
     
  16. Corbs

    Corbs Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    17 июл 2008
    Сообщения:
    1.719
    Симпатии:
    763
  17. QLDriver

    QLDriver New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    3 апр 2011
    Сообщения:
    81
    Симпатии:
    40
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Materials Testing
    Адрес:
    California, USA (From Yorkshire)
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    How about "reverted"?
     
  18. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    31 авг 2010
    Сообщения:
    5.615
    Симпатии:
    9.418
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Адрес:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Or to use an often used phrase "restored" as in "restored to original specification".

    Making it far too difficult, good people!
     
    Martin Perry нравится это.
  19. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    28 янв 2009
    Сообщения:
    2.423
    Симпатии:
    1.707
    While you're pondering the grammar, don't forget FR 20.
     
  20. Smokestack Lightning

    Smokestack Lightning Member

    Дата регистрации:
    14 окт 2013
    Сообщения:
    262
    Симпатии:
    91
    Пол:
    Мужской
    This is true. The prefixes "un" and "non" both mean "not". For example unwell means not well.

    So unrebuilt means not rebuilt. Why is this a problem? Just asking like.

    Dave
     
    Bulleid Pacific нравится это.

Поделиться этой страницей