If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Steam Express 2016

Discussion in 'What's Going On' started by gwr4090, Jul 7, 2016.

Tags:
  1. Kenneth73000

    Kenneth73000 Guest

    The positivity practically flows out of you doesn't it...
     
  2. Peter29

    Peter29 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    105
    Not defending just trying to give an objective view of a complicated situation. Adheres to which gauge? There are many. Locomotive Gauge based on diesel/electric traction? W6 gauge? W10? The permanent way has of course been changed over the years and will continue to do so e.g. lines can be realigned closer together under an arched bridge to accommodate higher containers (paradoxically 'gauge enhancement'), gap reduction at platforms to cater for modern rolling stock or safety legislation, greater cant to increase line speed on curves (which in turn can affect clearance at bridges, structures etc) are some examples. None of which may suit the profile of a steam locomotive with its unique ride characteristics even if it ran over the route in a much earlier era when the railway was very different. The P-way should be done to a specific gauge for that line as published in the sectional appendix.
    It was already an issue in the 1980s, one reason why BR restricted steam to a few mainly secondary routes. There seem to be few issues with gauging for steam on those same routes today, which is probably not a coincidence.
    Personally, I think it's amazing that so much steam runs over so much of what is a very busy and fast changing national network in the 21st century and am very thankful for it and the folk who make it happen.
     
  3. Kenneth73000

    Kenneth73000 Guest

    Did any of you who are upset actually pay to travel on the trip ??
    My Brother in law traveled and wasn't upset by the Diesel and he paid the fare,
    He paid so has the right to comment,
    What's the excuse of the last few pages on here ?
     
    maureen likes this.
  4. free2grice

    free2grice Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    5,625
    Likes Received:
    3,613
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Rolls-Royce engineer
    Location:
    Bath Green Park / Mangotsfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I thought this was a discussion forum for members of National-Preservation. I didn't realise that a restriction had been placed on who had the right to make a comment.

    As for the tour yesterday, I'm sure that all of the participants were perfectly happy after being informed that the steam locomotive that was due to haul them from the WSR to London had been replaced by a 'classic' diesel locomotive. <BJ>
     
  5. mrKnowwun

    mrKnowwun Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,366
    Likes Received:
    2,823
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    West Byfleet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    look in the mirror and what do you see.
    A keyboard warrior such as thee
     
    free2grice likes this.
  6. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,404
    Likes Received:
    18,231
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    188 miles from Paddington (via Bristol) or as near as dammit!:)

    Here's the last milepost, out the back of Minehead carriage works.

    Robin

    image.jpeg
     
  7. Peter29

    Peter29 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    105
  8. mrKnowwun

    mrKnowwun Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,366
    Likes Received:
    2,823
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    West Byfleet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Read it. Its a tome written to justify a deterioration in standards.
     
  9. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    22,590
    Likes Received:
    22,718
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What a sad direction for a thread to slip. I go away to enjoy some main line steam at its best with both the TOC and Network Rail trying to make it a memorable day for everyone, (which they did with Tornado) and while I am away a group of people make the West Somerset Express thread turn into quite a disappointing read.

    Nothing much about the outward run with Galatea and nothing at all about the train on the WSR with, I presume the S&DJR 7F. But plenty about something that possibly could have been anticipated if it is a gauging problem and not a lot to do with the charter itself or the TOC for that matter. Do we not already know that there is a problem eastbound on the Berks and Hants that prohibits Flying Scotsman and places a speed restriction on Tornado (plus, I think, Clan Line). Might we not be surprised, therefore, if this is the issue, that Galatea was also a problem? The loco has been out of gauge much nearer to home on the Cumbrian Coast so its hardly a revelation, annoying/sad though it is.
     
  10. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,404
    Likes Received:
    18,231
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It was, I believe, a timing problem, not a gauging one. It had to get back before lines were closed by possessions.

    Robin
     
    Rover likes this.
  11. Duty Druid

    Duty Druid Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    11,112
    Likes Received:
    4,704
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That would seem to be the case, as I saw return times for a 23:20 arrival at Padds, and then they disappeared, so assumed that there would be a possession or two putting the mockers on it - also saved me the bother of going out for some night time photography!

    I had tried to get a word in earlier, but everybody seemed to have picked a particular bone up & wouldn't let it go, so there seemed little point.
     
  12. Peter29

    Peter29 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    105
    Possibly both - one of the crew said they were returning via Bristol as it wasn't allowed back down the B&H
     
  13. free2grice

    free2grice Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    5,625
    Likes Received:
    3,613
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Rolls-Royce engineer
    Location:
    Bath Green Park / Mangotsfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    If the late arrival time at Paddington wasn't an issue, in theory the charter could have returned steam hauled via Bristol, Bath and Swindon. <BJ>
     
  14. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    22,590
    Likes Received:
    22,718
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Can we please remember that the Sunday trip to York had to go to KGX around 2200 so as to be clear of an engineer's possession. So there was clearly a problem if Galatea took the train back given that I don't believe it could go up the B&H. So I'm not certain that your "if the late arrival time at Paddington wasn't an issue" point would work. The late arrival was a problem compounded if the return was via a longer diversionary route.

    Having tried to piece it all together (amidst some of the ranting that has been removed from the thread) I think that @Peter29 is closest to the real reasons.

    Have to say that I take the silence from WCRC on this to probably be disgust at what has been said on here rather than any desire not to clarify the issues.
     
  15. Herald

    Herald Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2015
    Messages:
    311
    Likes Received:
    581
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Surely WCRC should get some thanks for having made long engine and coach moves from and to Carnforth to get any steam on this trip. Looking at the negativity on here I wonder why they bother but maybe they and the tour organisers know the market and want do the best they can in difficult circumstances for paying customers.
     
  16. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,748
    Likes Received:
    7,859
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    If I were to try & make a positive suggestion, it seems to me that given that we are going to be catering to an increasingly 'non enthusiast' market and the comments about 'silly o'clock' together with the reality of trying to fit trains into an increasingly crowded network, number of available locos etc etc there must be some questions about how well the current model works and possible alternatives
     
    Herald and 26D_M like this.
  17. Enterprise

    Enterprise Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,472
    Likes Received:
    3,302
    I think that you sound rather like Ralph. The way the steam mileage on this tour was reduced was clearly a huge disappointment to many. The "rants" may have been irritating to the apologists for the present state of mainline steam running but they were not without some validity. As has been said many times, WCRC and RTC would be far more popular if they put a minimal effort into providing accurate information as tour paths and motive power changed.
     
    26D_M likes this.
  18. AnthonyTrains2017

    AnthonyTrains2017 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    918
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Twas a pleasure seeing a jubilee class locomotive down yer in the south.
     
    45669 likes this.
  19. gricerdon

    gricerdon Guest

    Well said Al
     
  20. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    22,590
    Likes Received:
    22,718
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Put it this way. The operator and the TOC have a duty to those travelling, and nobody else, to explain what the problem was with the WSE as there clearly was a problem and my guess is that it was all down to constraints from Network Rail that they tried to accommodate as best they could. As nobody who actually travelled has come on here and said that they were kept in the dark and are dissatisfied with what was said in the paperwork with the tickets or on the train, then you have to assume that this was done and those people understand.

    There's no problem with discussing the complications associated with this trip - loco availability, routes, gauging etc - but I just don't see what the point is in going on about it and it's nothing to do with the view of 'apologists', whoever you think they are.
     

Share This Page