If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Bulleid Pacifics - Past or Present

本贴由 340072008-05-13 发布. 版块名称: Steam Traction

  1. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2009-10-22
    帖子:
    4,416
    支持:
    1,681
    Clearly 5029 is starting from a more complete point but once running it is probably quite route restricted as well as absorbing maintenance resources that might otherwise support a MN.
    Thr 'gubbins' you mention, air pump, electronics etc, could be reused from 5029 on a MN.
    Then there is the history of 5029 as a somewhat indifferent mainline performer?
    It seems unlikely there will be a shortage of main line Castles either whereas the significantly more useful MNs, or 'lights' for that matter, are pitifully under-represented.
    All said, its each to their own and if the owner of 5029 wants it running that is that.
     
  2. LC2

    LC2 Member

    注册日期:
    2012-06-10
    帖子:
    854
    支持:
    1,023
    职业:
    IT
    所在地:
    70B
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That would be great, I've missed the random choice of direction when departing behind a Bulleid.
     
  3. Hurricane

    Hurricane Member

    注册日期:
    2013-11-01
    帖子:
    823
    支持:
    307
    性别:
    所在地:
    71A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    With 5029 I am sure the locomotive running gear was overhauled and in good order shortly before the boiler was failed, therefore it should be a simple boiler overhaul and minor attention to the loco to get it back in service.
     
  4. buzby2

    buzby2 Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2009-03-26
    帖子:
    1,712
    支持:
    586
    所在地:
    Swanage
    SLL (owners) do not wish to their locos to go main line I believe. No doubt @nickt would clarify/confirm.
     
  5. nickt

    nickt Member

    注册日期:
    2009-04-17
    帖子:
    489
    支持:
    259
    性别:
    SLL use the same engineering standards as applied to main line operating locos, however we do not fit all the electronic stuff which is required to haul a train on Network Rail. Our locos are registered with NR and can travel on the main line in light steam; the last time was when Eddystone and Manston went to Eastleigh-100. Hypothetically Sir Keith Park could go to the KWVR Gala this week by rail, though it's actually going by low-loader. There is no current intention to operate 257 Squadron to Wareham.
     
  6. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-04-06
    帖子:
    9,748
    支持:
    7,859
    性别:
    职业:
    Thorn in my managers side
    所在地:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Is it simply that the business case isn't there or is there any other reason for SLL not going mainline?
     
  7. Bulleid Pacific

    Bulleid Pacific Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2007-04-14
    帖子:
    4,030
    支持:
    1,089
    职业:
    A Thingy...
    Support crew, or lack of, would be an issue, as it would mean that work on the rest of the fleet would have to stop. I'd imagine the business case for any mainline locomotive is fairly marginal due to limited steaming periods. This would preclude charging a daily rate, and would necessitate a high hire fee, which is equally constrained by what promoters are willing to pay.

    However, an operation similar to the NYMR crewed by Swanage crews would be an interesting proposition, although the moguls would probably be eminently suited to this task.
     
  8. Southernman99

    Southernman99 Member Friend

    注册日期:
    2009-11-10
    帖子:
    946
    支持:
    698
    Also. What other mainline work would there be for another Bulleid, maybe more? Unless you are a solely mainline loco, think Clan line or the A1. I know the latter does heritage but the support crew are full time. It is a massive strain on resources and time.
     
    已获得goldfish的支持.
  9. Bulleid Pacific

    Bulleid Pacific Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2007-04-14
    帖子:
    4,030
    支持:
    1,089
    职业:
    A Thingy...
    There would probably be enough work for another two class 7 and maybe even up to three class 8 Bulleids, but this would eventually be at the expense of some of the class 6 and below locomotives out there. However, the ongoing steam availability crisis means we are not in a position to even test the market saturation point at the moment. The other problem is that they are not necessarily based in areas of the country where they are most needed, and again we go back to volunteer manning and supervision in getting to the start point.
     
  10. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2008-03-08
    帖子:
    27,798
    支持:
    64,476
    所在地:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    As far as I can see, SLL seem to have no problems finding operators for their locos when they are in traffic - given that fact, what advantage would there be swapping the relative certainties of a hire agreement on a major line giving a high number of days in traffic if wanted, with the uncertainty, inconvenience and extra cost of equipment of mainline running? Not to mention the fact that, if required, a major line can probably give them large numbers of consecutive days in traffic which must be better from a firebox point of view than the irregular steamings on the mainline.

    (Disclaimer: I'm not an SLL member or connected with them in any way).

    Tom
     
    已获得35BMartin PerryHurricane的支持.
  11. nickt

    nickt Member

    注册日期:
    2009-04-17
    帖子:
    489
    支持:
    259
    性别:
    That's more or less it. You need very deep pockets to run on the main line as the technical and commercial risks are greater than on heritage lines. We have plenty to do keeping six locos serviceable and restoring Sidmouth along the way. Nick
     
    Last edited: 2016-10-05
    已获得Jamessquared的支持.
  12. siquelme

    siquelme Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2013-10-23
    帖子:
    1,021
    支持:
    911
    性别:
    所在地:
    Portsmouth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  13. nickt

    nickt Member

    注册日期:
    2009-04-17
    帖子:
    489
    支持:
    259
    性别:
    已获得CH 19, Martin Perry, Matt37401另外5人的支持.
  14. Bulleid Pacific

    Bulleid Pacific Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2007-04-14
    帖子:
    4,030
    支持:
    1,089
    职业:
    A Thingy...
    Excellent work!
     
  15. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2014-06-08
    帖子:
    15,551
    支持:
    11,955
    所在地:
    Wnxx
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    How long before a return to traffic?
     
  16. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    注册日期:
    2014-12-08
    帖子:
    19,264
    支持:
    12,517
    性别:
    所在地:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    in time for July 2017 ? ;)
    Just out of interest, are there any preserved bulleid pacifics that that made it through to the end? i guess blackmoor vale may have as she was purchased straight out of service as was Clan line, so out of the number now preserved which locos made it through to 1967?
     
  17. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2014-06-08
    帖子:
    15,551
    支持:
    11,955
    所在地:
    Wnxx
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That would be obvious wouldn't it?! :p:p
     
  18. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-04-15
    帖子:
    16,551
    支持:
    7,897
    所在地:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Those two; 34051 was withdrawn in 1965 and all the other survivors are ex-Woodhams, the majority of which were withdrawn in 1964/5 (Blue Star, Port Line and Ellerman Lines were Woodhams last Bullied purchases; wdn 9/66.)
     
  19. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2014-06-08
    帖子:
    15,551
    支持:
    11,955
    所在地:
    Wnxx
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What was the one the MNLPS was after originally? Was it 35018? Didn't that survive till the end?
     
  20. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-04-15
    帖子:
    16,551
    支持:
    7,897
    所在地:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Apparently 35022 was their original choice but it was withdrawn 5/66 and sold to Woodhams.
    35018 wdn 8/64.
     

分享此页面