If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. Romsey

    Romsey Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,628
    Likes Received:
    1,648
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired SPM
    Location:
    Close to Spike Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Some of the locations chosen for evacuation were none too clever.

    My mother was evacuated with her school from Wimbledon to Eastbourne. After a few months of the phoney war they returned to London just in time to watch the Battle of Britain overhead..... But then Eastbourne would have been right in the front line in case of an invasion. When the overnight bombing of London started her school was evacuated again, this time to Llanelli. After a month or two Llanelli was bombed. The area of Wimbledon where her family lived had a few bombs, but the road she lived in was only seriously damaged towards the end of the war by a V1 flying bomb. By then she had started work and was down at Dorking.

    Not all evacuations were from London. Many people left cities like Southampton and Portsmouth and stayed a few miles outside.

    Cheers, Neil
     
    Paul Kibbey and Yorkshireman like this.
  2. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It was not expected that France would fold; the main threat from bombing was expected to come from Germany, with the east of Britain being in the firing line, albeit with London still being the main target.
     
  3. Steamage

    Steamage Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    4,738
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Location:
    Oxford
    Indeed. My mum's family moved from Southampton to Kimbridge in the Test valley. With hindsight, this wasn't a good choice, since it was very close to a loop on the railway where ammunition trains from Dean Hill were held before proceeding to Portsmouth docks. Fortunately, none of these trains were attacked while they waited there.
     
    Paul Kibbey likes this.
  4. AnthonyTrains2017

    AnthonyTrains2017 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    918
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Is the water tower at Minehead near turn table working now?
     
  5. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    17,961
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    West Somerset Railway - Then, Then and Now #84

    Williton 1965 / 1970 / 2017

    A most interesting and powerful triple.

    Everything there in 1965.

    But by 1970: loop shortened; water tower and column gone; footbridge gone. Closure notices up and oblivion beckoning for the Minehead Branch as the folk of the Bristol Division of British Railways worked their particular 'magic' on local Railways...

    But fortunately there was a meeting over a pub in Taunton and the rest is (recent) history...

    Copyright Joe Moss / E.Wilmshurst / Robin White

    1965
    IMG_9237.JPG

    1970
    IMG_9251.JPG

    2017
    IMG_9712.JPG
     
  6. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I wonder why the loop was shortened? Looks quite a sharp curve, but that could be the camera lying? :)
     
  7. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,214
    Likes Received:
    7,271
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Interesting to see the new arrangement with the reinstated full length loop compared with the old one. I might add that the new arrangements make more sense than the old
     
  8. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    17,961
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Between the photographer and the road bridge is an underline bridge which carries the Railway over the Monksilver Stream. This had to be renewed on 1968. By then the long loop was no longer needed (the normal train was a 3- or occasionally 6-car DMU). All trains called as well, so a low speed short radius turnout was installed which also had the 'merit' of fitting the trackwork between the stream bridge and the level crossing.

    Robin
     
  9. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Ah - thanks. So there was actually some 'logic' to what was done by BR in those days! :)
     
  10. Bayard

    Bayard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    3,871
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    You have to wonder why BR bothered to remove water tower, water crane and footbridge if they were just going to close the line. The writing must have been on the wall, even back in the mid '60s.
     
  11. tracker

    tracker Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2014
    Messages:
    464
    Likes Received:
    874
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired IT manager
    Location:
    Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Water tower and water crane, understandable with dieselisation. Perhaps it was a case of maintain the bridge or demolish. Perhaps the scrap value was being realised!
    Robin L
     
  12. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    17,961
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Someone who was around at the time told me that the BR view was that it was preferable to demolish the bridge rather than paint it.

    Robin
     
    Yorkshireman likes this.
  13. Colin Allcars

    Colin Allcars Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2016
    Messages:
    413
    Likes Received:
    491
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Newport
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The second photo shows the gap (as mentioned by Robin in a previous post) on the signalbox where the "passengers are requested" notice was and now is. Is the matching sign on the opposite platform shown on the first photo a candidate for reinstatement too?
     
    Yorkshireman likes this.
  14. Maunsell907

    Maunsell907 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2013
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    1,965
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    These notes encouraged me to look at Ian Coleby's excellent book again, as memory said the loop extended beyond the road bridge in the Taunton direction only post the 1930s line improvements, although the road bridge was built to dual track standards.

    Page 211 has three Williton diagrams : 1935 when the loop junction was before the road bridge, 1937 loop extended beyond bridge with the junction on the Up side of the road bridge and 1968 with the truncated loop as per BR.

    Ian explains that in the 1933-36 upgrade Williton was virtually untouched ie all non stopping trains still had to slow to 15mph to effect hand token exchange when passing through on the loop. However when new high speed (40 mph) turnouts were installed their length was such that they had to be on the Up side of the road bridge. Whitaker apparartus was installed at the same time. (This change occurred in 1937).

    Michael Rowe
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2017
    Black Jim and Yorkshireman like this.
  15. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,185
    Likes Received:
    57,810
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The NLS website indicates that the up (Taunton) end of the station remained largely unchanged at least up to 1929, with the loop finishing short of the river bridge. Interestingly, the down (Minehead) end of the loop got extended some time between 1902 and 1929.

    1887 - http://maps.nls.uk/view/106021694#zoom=4&lat=9915&lon=4642&layers=BT
    1902 - http://maps.nls.uk/view/106021697#zoom=4&lat=9915&lon=4642&layers=BT
    1929 - http://maps.nls.uk/view/106021700#zoom=4&lat=9915&lon=4642&layers=BT

    Tom
     
  16. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    17,961
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It is.

    I have been on the lookout for some time.

    Of course, if someone had one to donate....?

    Robin
     
    Yorkshireman likes this.
  17. AnthonyTrains2017

    AnthonyTrains2017 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    918
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What's likely to be in the wagon consist of the 47 ex Wilton to Minehead later. Wondering If I should leave early to see that from this boring meeting. Thxs
     
  18. alastair

    alastair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,236
    Likes Received:
    754
    Just seen this in latest Steam Railway:




    upload_2017-10-4_12-41-12.png



    All sounds rather concerning, particularly that an "unnamed senior board member" thought it a good idea to brief a journalist? Why would they do that, what was his/her agenda? Rather smacks of "airing dirty linen in public" does it not?
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2017
    Black Jim and Paul Kibbey like this.
  19. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    Without particular reference to the WSR could "big chufferitis" knocking track around play its part? It may be happening elsewhere as well. I agree with @Alistair that it is not really something to broadcast.

    PH
     
  20. Paul Kibbey

    Paul Kibbey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,165
    Likes Received:
    1,402
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Land of Sodor
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Not being big in technical railway engineering but surely any damage done is done by high axle weights .So the largest locos regularly on the WSR are the 7Fs with 6 axles on the loco + tender . So would that do more damage than the 0-6-0 , 4 F ? Or 6960 ? I did hear that the line was upgraded years ago from branch line status , so heavier locos like the Kings or large Pacifics were safe on the track . If I have any of my ' facts' wrong I apologise , feel free to put me right .
     

Share This Page