If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Riddles Quote

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Hermod, Oct 20, 2017.

  1. Hermod

    Hermod Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2017
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Klitmoeller,Denmark
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    https://imgur.com/EXrS9kg
    https://imgur.com/dGiNqYc
    https://imgur.com/ccTqN1w
    https://imgur.com/lUU9woG
    https://imgur.com/wX7g9cz
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2017
    30854 likes this.
  2. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2,264
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Location:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    S.A.C. Martin likes this.
  3. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  4. Hermod

    Hermod Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2017
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Klitmoeller,Denmark
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    No trouble.
    Not very many steam trains drove many minutes at 90.
    Seconds rather.
     
  5. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think you’ll find quite a few LNER Pacifics were capable of sustained 90mph runs. That was the entire point of building them in the first place.

    Granted on the routes they ran there were few places to do such speeds - but they all proved rather capable of doing so.
     
    Sir Nigel Gresley likes this.
  6. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,121
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The Bulleids were no slouches either. As with all front line express locos, it was line speed limits that hindered them, not the inability to run fast.
     
    Sawdust and S.A.C. Martin like this.
  7. CH 19

    CH 19 Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    632
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    W14
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  8. RLinkinS

    RLinkinS Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    928
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thank you for posting this. I especially liked the last one. Iwas present when Mr Riddles attended IMLEC in Bristol in 1971. Somewhere I have the programme signed by him. Many years later I competed in an IMLEC at Bristol with my BR Class 2 2-6-0. At one point I was travelling at a scale speed equivalent to 135 mph for the full size loco. I wonder if hope he would have approved?
     
  9. Hermod

    Hermod Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2017
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Klitmoeller,Denmark
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I use adblock and was not aware of being a Trojan horse.
    Can pictures be hosted otherwise less offensive?
     
  10. Hermod

    Hermod Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2017
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Klitmoeller,Denmark
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I would have loved being at the IMLEC 74 and have given free advice how to win next IMLEC.
    A 2-10-0 compound with a big midframe LP cylinder and two outside HP cylinders.
    Pure Webb from Crewe where Riddles learned his trade.
    Have removed pictures from Imgur.
     
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2017
  11. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,165
    Deleted
     
  12. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,165
    That explains why I can see them. But why post something interesting and then remove it?
     
  13. Hermod

    Hermod Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2017
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Klitmoeller,Denmark
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I do not understand copyrigth laws and Imgur carries a lot of trash.
    Sources are:
    Pacific Steam.Martin Evans.Percival Marschall 1961
    Steam World issue 144 from 1999
    Model Engineer 3495 from 1974
     
  14. maddog

    maddog New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    89
    The nearest to the proposed 4-8-0 is presumably the GWR 4700 2-8-0? Wasn't it quite a long wheelbase and presumably restricted as a result?
     
  15. Hermod

    Hermod Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2017
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Klitmoeller,Denmark
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The GWR thing had a narrow firebox between frames that sit so close to backside of wheels as possible.
    With a wide firebox over driving wheels a la WD 2-10-0 and 9F frames can be closer to each other and this makes sideways movements of coupled wheels possible.
     
    maddog likes this.
  16. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Possibly a daft question, but when so many pre-grouping attempts to exceed four coupled wheels failed due to inadequate firebox grate and/or draughting, what design feature made the GER/LNER S69/1500/B12 Class so much more successful than many other contemporary designs? It certainly wasn't bags of space!
     
  17. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2,264
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Location:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Probably because they received a new larger boiler in the 1930s and at much the same time (perhaps more importantly) got new redesigned cylinders and valve gear in line with the then current practice and thinking.
     
  18. 8126

    8126 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    962
    Gender:
    Male
    I've mused on this somewhere on the forum before, but I think there are two facets to this. The 1500 design is undeniably smaller than some of the contemporary failures; easier to get reasonable proportions in terms of firebox depth to grate area if your firebox simply isn't as big. The grate on the original 1500 is smaller than a lot of 4-4-0 designs at only 25 sq.ft, but the B12/3 is much more in keeping with later 4-6-0 practice at 31 sq.ft, so that can't be the whole story.

    The big difference, IMO, is that the design is a very different configuration to a lot of the failures and most of the later successes. Take the Drummond 4-6-0s, which were notably troubled by their (large) shallow grates. The firebox sits over both the trailing and centre coupled axles, rendering the ashpan very shallow there and thus prone to choking the front and rear of the grate. The dampers are actually between the axles, so incoming air has to do a neat U-turn to get the extremities of the grate, no doubt packing any ash in nicely. The worst variants had an enormous barrel too, so the front of the brick arch was forced lower. The fireman then has to be be very adept at maintaining a thin, shallow, hot fire over the whole grate without developing any holes. I think it's possible that a lot of the early unsuccessful 4-6-0s shared this undesirable configuration.

    On the GER 4-6-0, the firebox simply straddles the centre coupled axle, the trailing axle is behind the backhead. It's basically a big 4-4-0 with an extra axle shoved in the middle. So the only bit with a restricted ashpan depth below is the centre, which air can reach from ahead or behind. Ash can shake down either side of the hump over the axle and the whole grate should get a good supply of air most of the time.

    Most later successful 4-6-0s have a sloping grate over the trailing axle, but having nothing to do with the centre axle. Again, there's a hump in the ashpan somewhere along the grate, but air tends to come in ahead of and behind the hump. The front of the firebox can be suitably deep, allowing plenty of depth of fire under the brick arch. Some of the larger designs (Castles, Lord Nelsons, Kings etc) have a split grate, where the rear portion is roughly horizontal and the bit ahead of the trailing axle slopes down. This ensures the sloping grate doesn't make the firebox unduly shallow at the back end.
     
    MellishR and 30854 like this.
  19. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    @8126 Thanks for the comprehensive info. Your comments on airflow beneath decks were illuminating, though as you say, it doesn't seem the whole answer. The B12/3 rebuild (which undoubtedly prolonged the life of the class in numbers) with larger boiler and firebox was evidently quite a masterful achievement and re-equipping the rebuilds with long travel valves certainly seems to have improved their performance.

    There's a possibly telling comment in the 'LNER Ecyclopedia' entry concerning poorer quality coal in the postwar period, as much as train weights, being the driving force behind Gresley's development of the B17. If that is correct, perhaps in original condition, they were as close to the success / failure line as the LNW 'Claughtons', just that the S69 came down on the right side of that line. Perhaps it's a mischievous thought, but given his success with the B12's, I can't help wondering what might have been if Thompson had been let loose with the Bowen-Cooke design!

    All things considered, it's surprising the layout which made them so useful over lines with axle load isues wasn't copied by any other railways, many of which had routes every bit as tricky as their GER stamping grounds. The LNER deployment to the former GNoS rather bears this out and they certainly 'got about' during the WWII period of government control.

    These locos have been a firm favourite since my days of chasing Hornby locos around the carpet (probably why my knees are shot!). The story of how the survivor survivied ("Yes, of course we'll send it for scrapping when we can get it out of the shed"!) only served to further endear this unique class to me.

    Sorry 'bout the thread drift folks, but the Riddles firebox considerations changed the points!
     
    Hicks19862 likes this.

Share This Page