If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Bluebell Motive Power

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Orion, Nov 14, 2011.

  1. 8126

    8126 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    962
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm not sure whether the thermic syphons were a bonus or a cause of the steel firebox, but I think it's likely that the steel firebox was a design decision independent of the wartime economic conditions. Look at the Q1, the most austere design Bulleid did and yet there's a copper firebox. Now of course that allowed re-use of the Lord Nelson flanging blocks, so maybe that skews the economics a little, but then the Pacifics also had solid bronze axleboxes as built; again, if you're looking to save every scrap of copper that's not what you'd do.

    With the high pressure of the Bulleid boilers as built, a steel firebox very quickly becomes just a sensible design choice - it can (and needs to be) thinner than a copper box, which combined with the all-welded firebox saves a useful chunk of weight. The thermic syphons then add weight back in, but recent experience on the LMS among others had shown that radiant heating surface was all-important in giving a free steaming boiler and Chapelon was using steel fireboxes and thermic syphons on his locomotives, of which Bulleid was probably more aware than most British CMEs.

    I am of course speculating...
     
  2. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'd love to see today's computer modelling applied to thermic syphons. From what I've seen, they all tend to fail in the same place (the outside obtuse angle). Even with Porta's work on GP systems, it strikes me that there remains work to do within the firebox. Add to this my personal peccadillo (torrified biomass) and there's scope for some serious research. "Fenchurch" on pellets? Effit, why not?

    Am I raving? Check it out and see what you think:

    http://csrail.org/torrefied-biomass
     
  3. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,429
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm sure it would be an interesting discussion on another thread ...

    Tom
     
  4. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I too was puzzling over the Bulleid Society Chairman's precis of the reasons behind the choice of steel. I attach the relevant extract from Bulleid's paper to the ILoco E (1946), in which he prioritises weight saving. He ranks the use of steel v. copper as desirable in connection with material availability, and the pressure factor is mentioned, although slightly obliquely. Cost does not appear. Neither is the ability to repair fireboxes at sheds mentioned (I assume that comment is aimed at repair of plates rather than stays, as stay changing must have been routine). Now it is possible a more thorough exegesis of available material would support cost as a factor, but it does not seem to have been uppermost in Bulleid's mind at the time.
     

    Attached Files:

    S.A.C. Martin and Jamessquared like this.
  5. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That is technically correct - copper welding was not possible at that time. I do not know if this was Gresley's reasoning for the design on the V4, however.

    It would be fun to see one of the Bulleids pulling the Golden Arrow one day :)
     
  6. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    4,442
    Likes Received:
    6,546
    To my knowledge The Bulleid Pacifics and the one V4 were the only locos in the UK to use thermic syphons and they all had wide steel fireboxes at a time when copper boxes were the norm in this country. Another type that used a wide steel firebox was the WD 2-10-0 and these incorporated a simpler version of the thermic syphon, namely welded arch tubes. The narrow firebox WD 2-8-0 version on the other hand I think stuck to a conventional copper firebox. Happy to be proved wrong on any of this if others know more than I do.

    Peter
     
  7. Kylchap

    Kylchap Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2015
    Messages:
    463
    Likes Received:
    840
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    East Anglia
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Can someone please explain why thermic syphons were used in locos with a steel firebox but not in copper ones? Thanks.
     
  8. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    See post #2885 (above), but if your question was aimed at syphons formed from copper, I'd be interested to know too (even if I end up feeling a bit daft, should the answer be glaringly obvious!).
     
  9. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Bruce (The Steam Locomotive in America) actually covers Arch tubes, Syphons and Circulators (e.g. as in the SAR Class 25) in one diagram titled "Three methods of fire-brick arch support" i.e. focusing on this rather than their circulating characteristics. Arch tubes seem very common in wide boxes (other than in the UK).
     
  10. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    4,442
    Likes Received:
    6,546
    That's because most parts of the world used steel fireboxes. I'm sure we would have seen far wider use of such devices here if the technology of the day had permitted their construction in copper boxes.

    Peter
     
  11. twr12

    twr12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,541
    Likes Received:
    692
    When a very experienced Bulleid fitter (preservation era): 35027, 34072, 34028, 34070; looked into 60163s firebox, he said “what holds up the roof?”

    You had to know Frank to appreciate his sense of humour!
     
  12. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,429
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  13. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,429
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  14. 45076

    45076 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    313
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    34004
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Update on 73082 from FB.

    On Tuesday 17th April, whilst heading north on its second trip of the day out of Kingscote, 73082 Camelot failed due to an issue with the left-hand rear cylinder cover. The service train was reversed back into Kingscote Station and terminated there.
    Initial inspection of the locomotive revealed that the left-hand rear cylinder cover had cracked/fractured.
    Camelot remained at Kingscote overnight and on Wednesday the connecting rod was taken down and she was towed back to Sheffield Park by the 09 shunter. Closer inspection at the Locomotive Workshop revealed that both the left and right front cylinder covers were cracked and the left-hand piston head was broken. At this point a visual check has not shown the cylinders to be damaged but a more detailed inspection will be undertaken.
    Whilst the cause of the problem is still to be determined, the focus is to get the repairs underway as a matter of priority. Patterns are not available for the cylinder covers (these are unique to the Fives) so these will have to be made.The piston head casting can be obtained from an external supplier.
    Based on the current findings we expect Camelot to be back in service in two to three months time.
     
    jnc likes this.
  15. Hirn

    Hirn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2015
    Messages:
    462
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    From the want of a pattern and with several standard 5s both preserved and run it seems a cylinder cover failure like this
    - three together - is something new. The right hand cover might just be a coincidence. Both cylinder covers and the piston between them
    on the left side could obviously be a result of a loose chunk of the piston. All the failures could have a common root cause though.

    Given it hasn't been very long in traffic since a major overhaul might it be worth checking the relief valves on the cylinder covers?

    Doubt the piston is out yet but it would be interesting to see a good photograph of the fracture where it has broken.
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2018
  16. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2,264
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Location:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The WD 2-10-0s had their arch tubes expanded in as I can recall reading somewhere of a case where due to expansion and contraction one of the tubes blew out of the firebox throat plate. This happened on one of the BR ones based in Scotland.
     
  17. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Didnt the Mid-Hants have/make a pattern when 73096 had its incident?
     
  18. twr12

    twr12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,541
    Likes Received:
    692
    That’s a lot of incompressible water!!!!!!
     
  19. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Destroyed in the fire?
     
  20. A1X

    A1X Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,158
    Likes Received:
    1,158
    Occupation:
    Insurance
    Location:
    Good Old Sussex by the Sea
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Going back to the impact this might have on the fleet, does this leave just four locomotives capable of hauling some of the more decent length trains (e.g. Arrow / Rambler and up)? As in the S15, Q, H and O1? That's...tight.
     

Share This Page