If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Heritage Line Loco Power Requirements

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by johnofwessex, Jul 21, 2017.

  1. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Ouch!

    Thank you for the correction.

    I’m not suggesting you would run it with just the three engines. I suspect it’s the same argument everywhere. Run what you have! I have planned a trip to the IOWSR and I’m trying to plan my trips around seeing the original island stock and locos in particular.

    It’s the enthusiast disappointment of potentially seeing something not in keeping with the history of the place that I’m struggling with.
     
  2. ross

    ross Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    2,477
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I imagine a great many of us think as you do, but we all have to admit that such feeling might be classed as WIBN.I think probably the great many who don't care so much about the locomotive appropriate don't care at all and just want a steam engine on the front. I do hope though, that you aren't giving way to unthinking prejudice about the hard-working, much maligned Austerities. The preservation movement owes them an enormous debt, and if people start repeating such prejudices, sooner or later someone will have to write a book to set the record straight!!!
     
    andrewshimmin, jnc, paulhitch and 2 others like this.
  3. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Absolutely not. They have saved lines in some cases. Incredibly useful.

    Maybe I was overthinking it. Looking at my plans for the autumn I pondered my feelings on seeing the ivatts pulling the trains.
     
  4. gwalkeriow

    gwalkeriow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    1,727
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Both terriers and the 02 were in service over the last four days :)
     
    S.A.C. Martin and paulhitch like this.
  5. ross

    ross Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    2,477
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Titfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Just joshing.
    I have to admit, I rather miss the austerities now that everyone has matured and those rusting hulks we used to climb all over in 1980 are now the crown jewels. The austerities are now a bit like Boxer, done the hard work to build something and then quietly put away as a bit too mundane. The noise they used to make going up a gradient with 5 or 6 mk1's on the hook used to be magnificent! Oh for Holman F Stephens on Tenterden Bank
     
    Monkey Magic, 30854 and S.A.C. Martin like this.
  6. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Now, if the Standard 2 2-6-2 tanks had got there in BR days as planned, what would your attitude be?
     
    paulhitch likes this.
  7. John Petley

    John Petley Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,849
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Researcher/writer and composer of classical music
    Location:
    Between LBSCR 221 and LBSCR 227
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I can see your point, Simon, and it really boils down to how far down the road of compromise must a railway go in order to offer a heritage experience. With the Isle of Wight Steam Railway, the O2 and the two Terriers, along with the appropriate vintage stock, are as good an authentic experience as you can get anywhere. Yes, there are some other highly authentic combinations on other lines - 80151 and a non-corridor set on the Bluebell will hopefully be a sight we can enjoy again before too long and 32678 with the K&ESR's vintage set does have a good feel to it, even though a truly "authentic" K&ESR train really should be a terrier and only one carriage.

    However, what do you do when you don't have sufficient locos or stock to provide authenticity at this level yet need to run some sort of steam-hauled service for the public? I would say that the Ivatts are much less inauthentic than some trains which one sees on other lines. After all, they are very similar visually and mechanically to the 84xxx tanks which were considered as replacements for the O2s before BR opted for electrification instead. They are thus a lot less implausible than, say, 35006 on the Gloucester-Warwick, 5775 on the Worth Valley or the Dukedog on the Bluebell (the only GWR engines ever to reach Sussex prior to 3217's arrival were the panniers which passed through en route to replacing the R1s on the Folkestone Harbour branch.

    So yes, Calbourne will always be the IOWSR's flagship. It, the Terriers and before too long the E1 will continue to ensure that it will be possible at least some of the time for us to enjoy the feel of the Isle of Wight's railways as they were in the steam era and with the loco roster available on line, it should be possible to choose a day when the engine(s) you want to see will be in operation , but 41298 or 41313 hauling a rake of non-corridor bogie stock is (i) at least a sight which could have been seen on some Southern branches in the 1950s, if not on the island itself and (ii) a far more modest compromise than many other lines are forced to make in order to provide Joe Public with a ride behind steam.
     
    andrewshimmin, ross, 2392 and 4 others like this.
  8. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Totally different. It would be authentic.

    It isn’t. So I feel the way I do.
     
    35B likes this.
  9. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    Gricer's gnat straining I fear.
     
  10. Hicks19862

    Hicks19862 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    612
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Manchester
    I think it would be wonderful if every heritage line could run 'authentic' trains, but its just not possible in many cases, especially ex LNER lines where there is a lack of Eastern motive power. Lines like the NYMR and NNR have to rely on a mix of authentic types and 'foreign' types (by which I mean locomotives from other regions) to ensure they have enough motive power to run the required services.

    I haven't visited the IoWSR, (hope to one day it looks like a cracking line) but to me personally the presence of the two Ivatt tanks do not distract from the island branch line look of the line, even if they are not 'authentic'.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
    S.A.C. Martin and paulhitch like this.
  11. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Hey at least I am honest Paul.

    I presume that the logic of wanting to run authentic trains but having other rolling stock and locomotives available to run a service is acceptable to you?

    If that’s the case then you should have no problems with seeing an authentic Pullman train pulled by an authentic LBSCR Atlantic on an authentic ex BR and LBSCR line whilst other locomotives such as the standard 5 supplement the service.
     
    jnc, 35B and nine elms fan like this.
  12. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    None of it is terribly "branchline" but the Pullmans and the standards are authentic enough. As for the H2, well... The G.W.R. 4-4-0 strikes me as more appropriate for a rural railway. When is 473 to be sorted?

    PH
     
  13. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,439
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Gricers' gnat straining again surely?
     
  14. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    Evidently I should have put "more" in italics. However , using it is not the camel swallowing exercise which the use of express types on branch lines IMHO amounts to.

    PH
     
  15. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,439
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Personally I equate using a loco too powerful and using a loco off region as being equally inauthentic, the wrong loco is the wrong loco. However, if an authentic train can be marshalled, that is, matching locos and carriages, whether it happens to be on a branch line or mainline is, IMHO immaterial. Where else do you run a train of wooden bodied Pullman's anyway, certainly not the mainline.
     
  16. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    I think you need to read Post 732 again.
    In general, I think @John Petley has got it about right, even if he seems a bit tougher on the "Dukedoog" than I am!

    PH
     
  17. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,439
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Apologies forkssing your Pullman point. The rest of my post still stands though (I think!)
     
  18. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,099
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think when people talk about "realism" in train formations, too often they mean "what I approve of" rather than "what actually happened".

    A quick look at some photo albums reveals, pre-preservation:

    - An original Bulleid Pacific on a Sussex branch line, single track, about 9 carriages
    - A rebuilt Bulleid pacific on a Sussex branch line, tender first with a two coach train
    - A Schools class on a two coach train of Mark 1s
    - Numerous Urie / Maunsell 4-6-0s on three coach trains on the mainline
    - A Maunsell mogul in Southern (Bulleid) livery hauling a rake of Gresley teak carriages
    - A Maunsell mogul in Southern (Maunsell) livery hauling a rake of GWR chocolate and cream carriages

    So pretty well a prototype for anything - big locos on small trains, big engines on rural branch lines, mismatch of loco type and carriages, and so on.

    Ultimately, the historic railways had considerable diversity, well shown in photographs. It wasn't invariably twelve coach trains behind class 8 locos on the mainline and two coach trains behind small tank engines on branch lines. The two things I wish that we did better, in terms of creating realistic formations, would be to make them less uniform in type; and to remember that generally most secondary lines were running with rolling stock about a generation older than the newest available at given date, so even those lines aiming to represent the 1950s should be dominated by 1930/40s stock.

    Tom
     
    andrewshimmin, jnc, 2392 and 7 others like this.
  19. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    I agree about the rolling stock and it is the "sameyness" about the carriages of many tourist railways which is a profound disappointment to me.

    Where locomotives are concerned, it is more complex. There are a number of photographs of Ivatt 2-6-2ts taken on services in the Sussex Weald when brand new including 41313 at Barcombe and 41298 at Clapham Junction on its way to Tunbridge Wells West. However, loco. foremen were used to using any old wreck on minor work whatever its size, so it could accumulate mileage to get it in for a works overhaul. This should not justify present day tourist lines indulging any big chufferitis tendencies in its workforce.

    PH
     
  20. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    There is literally a photograph of Beachy Head pulling a train at Horsted Keynes in steam days.

    You are insufferable Paul.
     
    2392, Bean-counter, big.stu and 4 others like this.

Share This Page