If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    If the SCC decided to go that way, who could blame them? ([When] looking at the Big Picture, including other needs: clearly, loss of the line would be a significant blow to the area as a whole, as an attraction; and to the vintage rail world, the loss of an entire, lengthy, preserved branch line, in a scenic setting to boot, would be an irreplaceable loss.) There clearly aren't enough grown-ups in the WSR 'world' to responsibly operate the line; if there were, they'd have already all sat down around a table, and worked out how to reformulate the WSR's structure - and, in the process, shown that they collectively had the maturity to put the well-being of the line as a whole over their personal viewpoint.

    A while back, I said that if the members of the WSR 'world' wanted to know the fundamental cause of the line's troubles, they all had only to look in the mirror. I know all the above is a harsh and painful judgement, and it gives me no pleasure at all to make it (in fact, just the opposite), but I think it must be duly swallowed if the line is to avoid the SCC eventually deciding that sadly, there are better uses for the assets.

    Noel
     
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2020
  2. staffordian

    staffordian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    2,134
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The Potteries
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Thinking about the latest actions by "The Fourteen".

    It's been stated or suggested that the aim would be a merging of the two charities, and that may well be the best final outcome.

    But, if elected, would the new board also be able to have a more immediate impact by resolving to use their WSR plc shareholding in concert with the holding of the WSRA to either bring pressure to bear on the plc or to call an EGM to carry through some of the necessary changes?

    What I'm unsure of is how independently a new WSSRT board could act without first seeking approval from it's shareholders. I do seem to recall though, in the context of what the plc board can do, that the shareholders are effectively powerless. This, of course, cuts both ways. It may mean the WSSRT can use it's shares as it sees fit, but it may still find that the combined holding has little influence on the plc...
     
    ross and Monkey Magic like this.
  3. Lineisclear

    Lineisclear Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2020
    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    1,117
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Worcestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    There’s a distinction between what they can do and what they prudently should do. As is normally provided in any Articles of Association the company/incorporated charity is run by its directors/trustees. In theory the decision as to how to vote shares in the PLC would that of the WSSRT Trustees alone.
    Other posters on here have pointed out that heritage railways are’nt like ordinary companies and businesses. The people who contribute funds and give their time have huge emotional capital invested in “ their” railway. The same is true of a membership dependent organisation like the WSSRT.
    A sensible board would recognise that and at least explain why it is adopting a particular course .
    Where I agree with many posters on here,in the context of the PLC , is that to be successful you have to be inclusive. Boards are not there to be popular nor are companies democracies. Directors/Trustees are obliged by law to sometimes make tough decisions that are right for the company even though they are unpopular. In my view that doesn’t mean you take your members, shareholders and supporters for granted. Sometimes sounding out their opinions can be very helpful In arriving at a decision.
     
  4. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,487
    Likes Received:
    23,719
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Who said the board of trustees of the Steam Trust were likely to behave in such a way? And on what basis would you suggest that it might be reasonable for them so to do?

    They are members who are, so far as I’m aware, in good standing wit the Trust, and who propose themselves for office within the rules, and to pursue an agenda. If their approach is wrongheaded, as @Lineisclear suggests, members are at liberty to vote otherwise. Why is expulsion a reasonable response?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  5. gwilialan

    gwilialan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,658
    Likes Received:
    3,891
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Out there somewhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Oh I'm so glad to see you accept there "...may be others who can help..." (my highlighting) but then you immediately raise the next so called 'problem' of " Depending on who replaced any directors removed the ORR confidence issue might be relevant..." That is typical of your responses. You always appear to do nothing but list what may be problems involved with doing anything other than what you have suggested

    Until such time as I see you giving a balanced view of the situation and not just 1,001 reasons why doing anything other than what you and the members of the current board suggest would be impractical, impossible, just to difficult, etc, etc I cannot give any credence to your arguments
     
  6. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What is the WSRA view on all this?

    Clearly it assumes that the WSRA will be willing to use its shareholding to influence the behaviour of the PLC but it doesnt seem to be a given at present
     
    rodders154 and jnc like this.
  7. rodders154

    rodders154 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    770
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Grumpy old man
    Location:
    Yeovil
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The steam Trust can do as they see fit. I don't think that the articles say they have to have a reason. In this power grab all is fair in love and war. It maybe the nuclear option but it is there. As I said it would put the problem to bed as there is no likely hood of the CC wanting to be involved in the same way as they didn't get involved in the ex6. I still haven't heard from @alfort if the WSRA agreed to this action as it would be them who would be the beneficial party and 2 of the trustees are involved or are they waiting for the coup to fail so they can say "not us gov" it would be interesting how many of the 14 are lined up to be trustees of the WSRA.


    Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
     
  8. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,498
    Likes Received:
    5,455
    Let’s face it, after the WSRA situation, it probably wouldn’t be wise to repeat such a thing happening again. It actually reflects badly on the poster if you think about it, almost suggests the Default option is to ignore any need for change and expel those who try to instigate it.

    I’m not a member of the trust but if a perfectly legitimate move such as the proposal to appoint the new trustees and the response was expel them, I’d certainly consider not being a member.

    The link to Nat Pres is also short sighted, although the publicity is welcome, I would be wary about linking this thread as while it does indeed contain content from John Bailey it also contains lots of other content that may just open some of the trust members minds.
     
    ross, 35B, ghost and 1 other person like this.
  9. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It seems to me that in the same way that that the PLC board has been responsible over a number of years for allowing the railway to become run down, given that they hold between them sufficient shares to have de facto control over the PLC, there must be a question to be asked over the role of the WSRA & WSSRT in allowing this to happen.

    Why even now have they not looked at acting together to use their holdings in the PLC to attempt to influence its direction?
     
  10. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,222
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The obvious answer has to be that there are some with in the WSSRT that prefer to play silly games, not because they love the PLC, But because they have personal grievances against some WSRA trustees and would even prefer to see the railway close before working with the WSRA.
     
  11. staffordian

    staffordian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    2,134
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The Potteries
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    This is the $64,000 question and wasn't it stated many pages ago that the Trust had no interest in influencing the plc through it's shareholding?

    Quite why it feels it's future is not in any way dependent on the success of the railway I don't know, but I can see why having both blocks of shares available to use as one can do nothing but good.
     
    Piggy, ross, Sunnieboy and 2 others like this.
  12. ghost

    ghost Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,967
    Likes Received:
    5,064
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    N.Ireland
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    So what you're saying is that the Trust is effectively a 'closed shop' and can expel a member for no reason, or tear up their application to be a trustee for no reason? And you think this is ok? Sounds like a lovely organisation, but then it does kind of fit with the ridiculousness of the whole WSR setup.

    Keith
     
  13. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,498
    Likes Received:
    5,455
    A quote there from Rodney. At the same time, he is now talking about expulsions and if the trust did as the WSRA tried. The nuclear option is there, is it wise to use it? This release was linked to in this very thread hence my earlier comment about linking to it.
    It does indeed come across this way.

    Personally, I think the best solution would be to run with it and actually let the members decide. I note for their post on the trusts Facebook page that the comments indicate that opinion is divided so seems the sensible option to me rather than looking at ways of getting rid of a perceived problem.
     
  14. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,222
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    And then you have to ask, why , Why would an organisation that held a block of shares , that could influence the thinking of the PLC not use that ability? what were the trustees those with influence with in the group, told to make them throw themselves in with the PLC?
     
  15. rodders154

    rodders154 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    770
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Grumpy old man
    Location:
    Yeovil
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Just by burying your head in the sand doesn't make the possibility go away. This is the steam trusts trump card. Remember there is more to this than you are being told ask yourself why the Steam trust is not willing to join with the WSRA What are you not being told is the real question? The real prize is to take over the PLC its not the Steam trust they are just the mechanism for it to happen. Someone sees themselves as PLC Chairman and it wont happen.

    For the record
    I am not a member of the Steam trust
    I have no influence of the WSR board.
     
    Greenway and nine elms fan like this.
  16. Bayard

    Bayard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    3,871
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I recognise this approach from watching "Yes, Minister". "To every solution, a problem" as Winston Churchill said about civil servants. However, John Bailey is a negotiator and negotiators don't get anywhere by alienating those who they are negotiating with. Also, in any negotiation, it is a foolish party that lays their hand on the table for everyone to see at the start.
     
    Triumph 2500S and jnc like this.
  17. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Or alternatively, the PLC Board and their apologists fear that a combined WSRA and WSSRT might hold them to account and challenge them and their decisions.

    Hence the shrill accusations of ulterior personal motivations.

    Shooting the messenger and ignoring the message and why it is being sent. And who has their head in the sand?

    Of course, you have no personal motivations in this issue at all...
     
  18. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,064
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    How strange that you read it one way and I see it differently. One tends to see what they want to see when reading text.

    My take on what is going on is this.

    A report was written that gave a way forward. It neither blamed the Board for bad decisions nor supported it but it did recognise that you can't ignore the PLC in seeking a solution. What seems to be going on now is trying to force a situation where the PLC has to engage with others if it is to get anywhere. That drives the dialogue yet to take place. It may also lead to changes, but because everyone has to engage then it may stand the best chance of success. And within this there may be casualties yet to be identified.
     
  19. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    No one disputes that nothing can proceed without the PLC board. However, the board is the biggest obstacle to reform. It has shown that it is completely unwilling to compromise unless forced.

    This to me is the biggest issue and the rest is just skirting around the main problem.

    A group of people want to go home.

    There is a car.

    The car driver is the person who drives the car. It isn't their car. The car is actually owned by someone else, but the car driver drives it. The others contribute to the petrol etc.

    The driver is drunk.

    The drunk driver is belligerent, objectionable and has banned a number of the group from riding in the car.

    The others recognise that the driver is: drunk, objectionable and very likely to crash the car.

    How to get the keys from the driver so everyone can get safely home (including those who had been banned from the car)?
     
    patriarch, ross, desperado and 4 others like this.
  20. Lineisclear

    Lineisclear Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2020
    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    1,117
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Worcestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

    A very pertinent question but you also need to work out how you are going to get the consent of the car’s owner.
     
    35B and Greenway like this.

Share This Page