If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

S&D Railway Trust

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by Andy Norman, Feb 24, 2020.

  1. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,498
    Likes Received:
    5,455
    I’m with @Big Al on this. I’m not sure if he doesn’t like your options but I certainly don’t. The reason is simple, it’s completely unrealistic and fantasy. It’s also massive thread drift in the middle of some interesting developments and we have discussed it already and there is no point continuing this discussion in the thread as frankly there is more chance of it going to the Island of Sodor than your suggestion of Hollycombe, especially considering they no longer even have a running line.

    Please take this friendly hint that we are not interested in taking this discussion any further as it is going nowhere.
     
  2. howard

    howard Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    270
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Ship's Engineer
    Location:
    Sandwich Kent
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I have a feeling that we should treat this person more gently.
     
    DavidH, Gilesy68, mgl and 18 others like this.
  3. richards

    richards Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,634
    Likes Received:
    1,921
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Because poorly-informed opinion = fact.

    I don't think x will work (based on no real knowledge), therefore it won't.

    Anyway, what colour is the new museum going to be?
     
    Robkitchuk likes this.
  4. mvpeters

    mvpeters Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    716
    Likes Received:
    838
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Is there really any reason to think the S&DRT Museum & Signal Box can't remain just as they are?
    Granted, some of the museum artefacts might move, but I'm sure there's plenty around to fill in any gaps.
    I really don't understand why the Plc would want to re-take responsibility for the station when it was already being (largely) maintained & run by the S&DRT, unless that's all part of the negotiations & the lease costs.
    It seems to me that S&DRT publicity of the Washford site generally might be improved, adding another gem to the 'string of pearls'.
     
    johnofwessex likes this.
  5. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,441
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    Two points here, I think.

    1. It would appear that the 'new' lease will be for the yard only, in which case it is difficult to see how the S&DRT could continue to occupy the old signal-box on the platform, or have any continuing Museum presence in the station building.
    2. There are a lot of 'small' exhibits currently in the existing Museum in the station building. IMHO there is no equivalent place in the yard to put them, although a few could go into the Burnham SB (I still have the plans for a similar proposal circa-2012!) and maybe one of the larger covered vans could be used for the rest, but it would not be ideal.

    There might be some argument for the WSSRT adding the 'Midford' exhibit to their portfolio of WSR-base museums, but it does need a lot of refurbishment work (none of which probably could solve the fundamental problem that the building is too small even for all the necessary interlocking, so the display has never been 100% accurate) and it needs to be managed and manned by people familiar with the prototype and the ideosyncracies of S&DJR signalling compared with (G)WR practice.
     
  6. City of truro fan

    City of truro fan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2015
    Messages:
    783
    Likes Received:
    84
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Honiton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    One good point is of some wagons leaving empty the yard to go to the mid hants if kilmersdon stays it will get more length to go up and down on.
     
  7. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,330
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Are you paying for the overhaul then?
     
    BrightonBaltic, Hicks19862 and ghost like this.
  8. City of truro fan

    City of truro fan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2015
    Messages:
    783
    Likes Received:
    84
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Honiton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What is the point of your reply. More run is a good point to make. The WSR may see this as a better attraction. For break van rides. I didn’t say it will be tomorrow. All groups are will be needing to look to the future and what it does with stations not just tomorrow. Why is who is paying for the overhaul a question to me.
     
  9. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,330
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Because you keep going on about it? It’s out of ticket and doesn’t work.
     
  10. jma1009

    jma1009 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    ynysddu south wales
    At one level I am very pleased to hear of 'City of Truro fan''s interest in SDRT loco Kilmersdon. It is only very recently out of ticket, and the last SDRT accounts and AGM report shows a healthy fund for it's overhaul.

    It is a very attractive loco and probably with the sort of following 'Invincible' has within the IOWSR at Havenstreet.
     
    granmaree and Hicks19862 like this.
  11. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,441
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    1. If the WSR had any interest in Kilmersdon for brake-van rides, why would they have evicted the Trust?
    2. How many extra people will come to Washford just to see Kilmersdon and ride the brake-vans, enough to make it an economic prospect?
    3. IMHO the Trust will get far more long-term income from extended hiring of Kilmersdon to another railway then just the occasional 'steaming day' at Washford.
     
  12. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The SDRT is probably going to have expenses to move their stuff (although probably nowhere near as large as without the deal to retain Washford Yard). Whether they will need to raid the fund for the move - no idea.

    Noel
     
  13. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,223
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    overhauling a loco will not be very high up on the trust's immediate plans, they have the items they are transferring to the MHR to remove, and then to decide how they re work the remaining exibits into the smaller yard space, if i were a betting man, I can't see any overhaul starting until things settle down, as there will need to be working parties now at two locations, one to sort ut Washford Yard, and another to get the wagons at least through piped, and to set up an museum somewhere on site. at the MHR.
     
  14. Daddsie71b

    Daddsie71b Member Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2013
    Messages:
    770
    Likes Received:
    638
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    34091
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sorry if I missed this is the thread. On a simply practical note with the 'new' agreement. Will the Museums visitors have access to the toilets on the station as in theory, they could simply want to visit the S&D site without travelling on the WSR and the station if not manned by S&D staff be shut in any case?
     
  15. jma1009

    jma1009 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    ynysddu south wales
    My understanding from emails and comments on the SDRT Facebook page is that, with lots of stuff yet to be finalised, the WSR Plc gets the station back that would inextricably include the signal box on the platform and the toilet block.

    The SDRT continues to lease the Washford yard with its buildings but with some kind of shared access agreement with it's Landlord, the WSR Plc, that is fraught with difficulties in writing a new lease!
     
    jnc likes this.
  16. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    For all the hundreds of pages I've never seen what, rationally, was in it for the WSR plc (let alone whether it was a price worth paying).

    Patrick
     
    jnc, The Dainton Banker and 35B like this.
  17. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,165
    That question, or variations thereof, has been asked over and over, and we still await a clear believable explanation, if indeed there is one. But it would be better to focus on what happens in future, rather than how the PLC and the Trust have arrived at the present situation. One significant piece of information that has been revealed only recently is that the eviction notice forced the Trust to make some decisions that they had previously avoided.
     
    jnc likes this.
  18. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,493
    Likes Received:
    23,731
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Since when did reason enter into these questions?
     
  19. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    4,444
    Likes Received:
    6,546
    I'm afraid I have nothing of any value to contribute to the discussion here but I thought this picture that I scanned yesterday may be of interest. It shows Washford as it was back in July 1977
    mini_77-7-14 36 Washford copy.jpg

    Things have come a long way since then

    Peter
     
  20. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,441
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    As with much of this thread, it is all supposition/guesswork at this stage, but....

    1. It would seem reasonable IMHO to expect that, if the Plc want to take over management of the station, then they will be planning to have it manned as far possible whenever trains are running. In which case no doubt the toilets will be available to all 'visitors'.
    2. It remain to be seen whether the S&DRT will continue to use the yard area as a Museum activity and therefore need to accommodate visitors other than on special open days.
    3. There may be a view formed that public use of the foot crossing to visit the yard when the station is not manned will be discouraged.
     
    jnc likes this.

Share This Page