If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,635
    Likes Received:
    8,303
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Everyone is entitled to an opinion and fair play to those in support of the plc who have the courage to post here. I would have far more sympathy if something approaching a coherent argument were presented .
     
  2. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,328
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I’ve yet to see a clear and concise argument FOR the plc yet Martin, all I see is point scoring that makes PMQ’s on a Wednesday seem rather tame.
     
  3. nanstallon

    nanstallon Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,323
    Likes Received:
    2,397
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Westcountry
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Quite. Change is required.
     
  4. jma1009

    jma1009 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    ynysddu south wales
    One way or another, or perhaps inconclusively, tomorrow's WSSRT AGM will determine whether the WSR plc board can rely on the WSSRT shareholding for at least another 12 months.

    I've got a long day in work tomorrow, but I would be very grateful if a full report/reports of the WSSRT AGM are posted on here before I get home from work!
     
  5. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,941
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Knowing this thread, by the time you get back you'll be struggling to find the report in among the 10 new pages of posts since you last looked!
     
    Squiffy, ross, Dealornodeal and 12 others like this.
  6. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,328
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Cheers Alex, you’ve just said what I’ve thought!
     
    Kje7812, 35B and flying scotsman123 like this.
  7. Bayard

    Bayard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    3,871
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Of course, it would never occur to you or any of your group that anything that you disagree with or don't want to believe could possibly be the truth.
     
  8. Bayard

    Bayard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    3,871
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    it is noticeable that nearly all those who post in support of the Plc come from a fairly small group close to the WSR, but many of those who are expressing concern at the Plc's actions or lack of them come from outside the WSR, many from other heritage railways.
     
    Piggy and Matt37401 like this.
  9. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,328
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I think that most of us understand what a democracy is, there are others who were never made prefect/milk monitor at school and rather like being in a position of power.
     
  10. jma1009

    jma1009 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    1,637
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    ynysddu south wales
    Or those who have a keen interest in old buses - that have always seemed to me to be peculiar type of individual.
     
  11. howard

    howard Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    270
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Ship's Engineer
    Location:
    Sandwich Kent
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I doubt that they can be more peculiar than some of the railway enthusiasts that I met over the forty years I was involved in railway preservation and operation!
     
  12. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    17,609
    Likes Received:
    11,222
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The main problem with some of the postings especially by those who support the PLC, Is that its based on personal animosity, against people the PLC, most likely fear, and who some of the supporters of the same PLC have a grudge against, and not on facts, which of course suits those in positions of power, scared that they might lose it, or have to account for their various actions, or lack of action to the membership.
     
  13. Keith Sims

    Keith Sims Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2015
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    684
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired from volunteering
    Location:
    Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The main problem with Frank C's statement (on WSR.org today) is that it fails to explain why the work was not carried out two years ago when funding became available. It also does not give a projected finish date, critical to the operation (COVID permitting) in March 2021. Surely this is not top secret for board members only! Communication of this sort of information would reduce the speculation that fills so many pages of this forum.
     
    Fish Plate, ross, jnc and 5 others like this.
  14. staffordian

    staffordian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    2,134
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The Potteries
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I point I have made several times.

    That particular article says nothing not already known but actually raises more questions than answers.

    For example, fortnightly meetings with SCC and professionals since May.

    Is this May 2018?

    I guess not, but surely it should have been, as the issue has been known of for that long, and as we know, funds set aside by SCC for it.

    If major problems arose along the way which led to the postponement of the works, why on earth be so secretive about it?
     
    jnc, MellishR and Keith Sims like this.
  15. Bayard

    Bayard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    3,871
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The immediate question that springs to mind is "why?". Why wasn't the work carried out two years ago? Why are we not being told why the work was not carried out two years ago? Why is it confidential information? Why are we not supposed to be asking these questions? To which the only reply can be, "someone cocked up and doesn't want to admit it".
     
    ross, ghost, Bluenosejohn and 5 others like this.
  16. jnc

    jnc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western Atlantic
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Well, they did have a legitimate distraction: the line's money issues. But the SDRT fiasco remains an inexcusable blot, and not just because of the horrible treatment of an inoffensive fellow heritage group: to put one second of their time and attention into that, while the crossing ball was being dropped, was a colossal purely self-inflicted management failure.

    Noel
     
  17. baldbof

    baldbof Well-Known Member Friend

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    1,828
    Likes Received:
    2,968
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, ex-RAF
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Quote taken from the regular update on PLC Board meetings, dated March 2018.

    My bold.

    By my maths and according to the Plc's own web-site, the preparatory work actually started in 2016.
     
  18. gwilialan

    gwilialan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,658
    Likes Received:
    3,891
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Out there somewhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    One wonders why that statement appeared now? There is no ongoing feed of information from the Board, there have been no obvious signs of anyone poking and prodding around the crossing equipment recently, no recent announcement that the work is about to commence and no real questions asking what's happening - except for some comments on here.
    Surely they are not looking to NP for PR advice?
     
    ross likes this.
  19. D1002

    D1002 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    8,658
    Likes Received:
    6,415
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Enfield
    Well the AGM started over an hour ago and no signs of white smoke rising over West Somerset;).

    No surprise there, as there aren’t any engines in steam:(.
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2020
  20. banburysaint

    banburysaint Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    368
    From Facebook "Summary of WSSRT AGM – 14th November 2020

    The board of Trustees of the WSSRT is pleased to update members and the wider WSR community on the results of the AGM of 14th November which was held virtually via Zoom due to Covid-19 restrictions.

    You will be aware that an attempt was made by a small group of members to try and overwhelm the existing board of trustees. This was done by quietly signing up additional new members from June this year, many from outside the WSR community, with the specific intent of appointing 14 new trustees to force a vote on merging with the WSRA, and thereby using the shares owned in each charity to try and take over control of the PLC

    At the AGM, the WSSRT membership voted to reject these new trustees by a significant margin. The total votes cast for them were 1,291 (70.54%) against and 508 (27.5%) votes in favour, with 31 (1.69%) abstentions.

    As a result, none of the proposed new trustees (originally 14, later 10) were elected and there was resounding support for the existing board of trustees, including election of the three new recently co-opted trustees and the membership voted by a significant margin for the WSSRT to remain as an independent charity.
    The board thanks members for achieving an 80% turnout on voting, and wishes to thank all of the wider WSR community who supported the charity to resist this takeover bid. The level of support was quite overwhelming and it is re-assuring that this event has served to demonstrate that most of the railway is, indeed, a united community.

    Steve Williams, acting chair of the WSSRT, commented: ‘This result is an overwhelming rejection of the tactics of those who sought to take over the Trust . The members concerned could have brought their plan to the WSSRT trustees in an open, collaborative and consultative way, rather than covertly proposing these additional trustees at the very last moment on deadline day for the AGM. We are also very sad that their confrontational approach, threats of legal action and reporting the Trust to the police led to the resignation of Chris Austin and David Baker from the resulting stress. This was a clear abuse of the Trust’s democratic processes and of the way in which volunteers are expected to behave. Those involved should now look at themselves in the mirror and hang their heads in shame’.

    Most encouragingly, the membership voted by a margin in excess of 75% to approve the following proposals:

    1 – Adoption of the revised Objects and Powers to align them with the requirements of key funding bodies and to allow us to offer a wider range of support to the PLC and the railway.

    2 - Adopt the alterations to Clause 60 dissolution clauses for the purpose of Museum Accreditation to make the Trust more acceptable to potential funders in future.

    3 - Adoption of the new Charity Name ‘West Somerset Railway Heritage Trust’ to properly reflect its future role, with responsibilities for heritage, history and museum management.

    The board of Trustees wishes to record a special note of thanks to Don Fraser, our membership secretary, for his remarkable handling of such a massive increase in membership, caused by the recent takeover attempt. The one positive that has come out of all this activity was a big increase in revenues, with a tripling of the membership numbers from just over 80 to nearly 250 members in the space of just four months.

    Looking ahead, the board of Trustees will now look forward to a new chapter in the evolution of the Trust. With a new name and additional flexibility around the Objects and Powers, the Trust can move ahead with more new initiatives and support future ideas to expand on the role of the Trust and to attract more donations in support of our work.

    We will explore how the Trust can expand its role on the railway generally and specifically examine how it can develop its leading role in museums management and heritage issues across the WSR. We hope that the new members who have joined us will choose to stay with us on this journey and will come to appreciate the positive work of the Trust in helping the railway.

    Finally, the Trust will continue to work closely with the PLC and specifically support the development of the Bailey proposals towards achieving ‘one railway’. Whilst the feeling amongst members today is that the Trust wishes to remain an independent charity, the Trust looks forward to contributing to the proposed ‘evolutionary’ path of the WSR re-structuring project.

    The Bailey project has the stated objective of creating a new parent charity structure that will be attractive to the wider community and it plans to invite existing charities to consider if they wish to become a part of it next year. The goal is to have any proposals ready in time for the 2021 AGM’s and of course the WSSRT board of trustees will bring any of these future proposals to the membership for their consideration at next year’s AGM."

    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=4772776239431683&id=179809878728365

    I am not a member of any of the organisations connected or based on the Wsr I am posting to hopefully help the question above

    Sent from my PRA-LX1 using Tapatalk
     

Share This Page