If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

7027 Thornbury Castle

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by svrhunt, Jan 18, 2015.

  1. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,911
    Likes Received:
    5,847
    I like Tom's ideas here. There are very few locos or other rolling stock displayed (as distinct from lying round looking untidy) in unrestored condition for Joe Schmoe to goggle at. One snag is that Didcot does already have a few bits that are just lying round looking untidy.
     
  2. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    19,232
    Likes Received:
    17,566
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
     
    Sheff likes this.
  3. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    19,232
    Likes Received:
    17,566
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Haven't they already got a 2-8-0 tank that has given its boiler to the County project which could serve that purpose?

    I wonder whether with all the negative publicity it has garnered for the GWS whether 7027 is unlikely to ever roll up there.
     
  4. Lord Belborough

    Lord Belborough New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2022
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Berkshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    4709 is being worked on at Tyseley. There is no room at Didcot for it or any parts of 7027 if/when the six months timeline passes. Currently at Didcot there is 1014, 1363, 7202 and 3650 being worked on.
     
  5. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,117
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    They don't. Which was why Didcot management were so [redacted] off when the 4709 project presented them with a fait accompli. Personally, but without the benefit of any inside knowledge at all, I suspect GWS management would be secretly delighted if someone comes up with a credible plan to take the thing off their hands.

    If it goes anywhere I bet it goes to Tyseley, where the 4709 project is based, and if its dismantled I bet Tyseley will be their no 1 prospective customer for the parts.
     
  6. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    289
    But that's where it came from originally. Why would they want it back? They also gave/sold a lot of parts to 7027 recently. But it would be the best place for it
     
  7. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    19,232
    Likes Received:
    17,566
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Because if it went there now in association with the 47xx project it would be for contract works which will bring money into the coffers at Tyseley.

    I suppose the one thing that remains is that whether Tyseley would want the negative PR that would likley be associated with dismantling a partly restored locomotive and how would those who contribute to Tyseley react?
     
  8. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    289
    That would make sense if the plan was to complete 4709 at Tyseley. I'm not sure it is; 1014 is not that far from being finished, leaving room for 4709 to be completed at Didcot. They can certainly do the boiler work.
     
  9. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,748
    Likes Received:
    7,858
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I could certainly see that a 'boilerless' Castle could make a fascinating display if there was a viewing platform allowing you to look down onto the gubbins in the middle
     
    hyboy and MellishR like this.
  10. Chris86

    Chris86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,575
    Likes Received:
    1,782
    Occupation:
    Safety, technical and vehicle trainer
    Location:
    South Yorkshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    But surely you only need the front two driving wheelsets, the 3rd one could be the basis for some oddball 2-2-2, using the spare 28xx boiler (shortened of course), I'm sure I saw the EMF advertising some tender wheelsets which could be used for the leading and trailing wheels....

    Thats how it works 'innit?
     
    GWR4707, 26D_M, 5944 and 2 others like this.
  11. ghost

    ghost Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,303
    Likes Received:
    5,727
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    N.Ireland
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    What livery will it be in? o_O:)o_O;):)
     
    Chris86 and 5944 like this.
  12. Chris86

    Chris86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,575
    Likes Received:
    1,782
    Occupation:
    Safety, technical and vehicle trainer
    Location:
    South Yorkshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    FIRST GW on one side, BR blue with arrows of indecision on the other.
     
  13. Lord Belborough

    Lord Belborough New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2022
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Berkshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    1014 is at least 2 years away from being finished. As mentioned before the restoration queue at Didcot currently is 1363, 7202.
     
  14. Chris86

    Chris86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,575
    Likes Received:
    1,782
    Occupation:
    Safety, technical and vehicle trainer
    Location:
    South Yorkshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer

    1363 especially I would have thought would be high on the priority list for use on site.
     
    26D_M likes this.
  15. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    289
    But 1014 is well ahead of 4709!
     
  16. Lord Belborough

    Lord Belborough New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2022
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Berkshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    We can agree on that!
     
  17. Lord Belborough

    Lord Belborough New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2022
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Berkshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes it is. Plan is to have 1340 Trojan, King George, 1466 and 1363 all available. Perfect sized engines for Didcot.
     
  18. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    19,232
    Likes Received:
    17,566
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What's the state of play with 1363 wasn't it started as a project for younger volunteers and then shelved as it needed much more work than envisaged, I hope they can kick on with 7202, that must be one of the longest running restorations ever done at Didcot.

    I suspect it could be argued that 7027 is well ahead of 4709 ;)

    Brill, it seems someone has finally identified what Didcot actually need on site rather than a WIBN approach, what's the basis for what appeared to be the pushing of King George up the queue, is it ultimately for the Thomas market?
     
  19. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,762
    Likes Received:
    5,890
    That was originally why it was bought from the GWSR for and why it has the unauthentic side tanks fitted but that plan was subsequently dropped when the overhaul was nearly completed.
     
  20. meeee

    meeee Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    1,382
    Perhaps someone should paint "NCB" on 7027's tender. Then nobody would care if it was hacked about.
     
    Richard Roper likes this.

Share This Page