If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

WCME/CME 2024

本贴由 mike15222024-01-02 发布. 版块名称: What's Going On

  1. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-10-02
    帖子:
    7,914
    支持:
    6,647
    性别:
    所在地:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Usually with a small footnote buried in the booking conditions about all aircraft may not be in the same configuration. So as most were concerned (and except the most frequent flyers) would expect, every aircraft would be the same.
    Over the years we got grief, especially regarding IFE (where others were way ahead of us), over expectation and delivery. Not sure anyone ever got anything back other than the time we despatched a flight to Sydney with all the First Class cabin with u/s IFE. I think those passengers in both directions were given something, and Engineering and Ops has a couple of tough questions to answer as well over the aircraft selection.
    I did read although I have not bothered to research it that Seat Guru as flagging up severe differences in the First Class product again.
     
  2. 30567

    30567 Part of the furniture Friend

    注册日期:
    2012-08-07
    帖子:
    6,124
    支持:
    4,088
    Is steam quite unusual Man Picc--Eccles--Wigan?
     
  3. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2011-06-18
    帖子:
    28,731
    支持:
    28,659
    性别:
    所在地:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That's why I mentioned the use of class 67s beyond Welshpool, which I think was in the final couple of years before ETCS was introduced. They are hefty machines, known to be hard on track, and far from small in their use of the loading gauge.

    I've no detailed knowledge of the loading gauge limits, but the fact that such large and awkward machines have been authorised suggests to me that it is not implausible that Tornado could be granted restricted permission to operate west of Welshpool.
     
    已获得Paul42Matt37401的支持.
  4. 2857Harry

    2857Harry Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2023-06-05
    帖子:
    1,203
    支持:
    2,485
    性别:
    职业:
    Conductor/Guard
    所在地:
    Kidderminster/Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I don’t dispute for some of the track, but Dovey Tunnel and other parts are very tight.
     
  5. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2011-06-18
    帖子:
    28,731
    支持:
    28,659
    性别:
    所在地:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Nor do I - though given the bulk of the 67 design and the length of the 158s that work the route, I'd be a little surprised if it were that restrictive (I have also been up the line behind 37s and in an HST).
     
  6. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    注册日期:
    2005-09-11
    帖子:
    36,443
    支持:
    9,907
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    所在地:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes I think it is as previously it's been from Victoria, ECS diesel hauled from Carnforth to I think Thorpes bridge junction where the steam came on, then back down Miles Platting to Victoria. The diesel was usually left in the turnback siding on the Salford side of Victoria.
     
  7. 30567

    30567 Part of the furniture Friend

    注册日期:
    2012-08-07
    帖子:
    6,124
    支持:
    4,088
    the RTC blurb says steam from Manchester.

    But looking at the LE move at Carnforth at 1049 I wonder if it will be T and T diesel to Carnforth then steam and diesel. Or perhaps that is for the loco to take water?

    https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/se...24-02-10/0000-2359?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt
     
  8. 2857Harry

    2857Harry Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2023-06-05
    帖子:
    1,203
    支持:
    2,485
    性别:
    职业:
    Conductor/Guard
    所在地:
    Kidderminster/Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Could be wrong but I thought that LE move was a Standard Path?

    As I understood this trip to be worked was the steam was to water at Carnforth. But with everything up in the air with the coaches and stuff perhaps there’s been a plan change?
     
  9. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-10-02
    帖子:
    7,914
    支持:
    6,647
    性别:
    所在地:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Also seems strange that arriving at Carnforth basically as the same time as a Euston originating CME, it has a later path north that involves being looped at Grayrigg. I can only assume the extra time is for watering.
     
    已获得hyboy的支持.
  10. 2857Harry

    2857Harry Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2023-06-05
    帖子:
    1,203
    支持:
    2,485
    性别:
    职业:
    Conductor/Guard
    所在地:
    Kidderminster/Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I did think that about the Grayrigg stop and the added time. It’ll either be water or special workings planned that weekend if there’s an event or something.
     
  11. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    注册日期:
    2005-09-11
    帖子:
    36,443
    支持:
    9,907
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    所在地:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    RTC says,
    "Our train leaves Manchester Piccadilly steam hauled at around 08:15 and calls at Wigan North Western to pick up passengers. We join the West Coast Main Line (WCML) and travel north to Preston, our final stop to pick up passengers. We continue through Lancaster to Carnforth, where our locomotive will take on water. "
     
    已获得3ABescot的支持.
  12. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2009-04-16
    帖子:
    8,912
    支持:
    5,847
    How come we're discussing a hypothetical run with Tornado to Aberystwyth or Pwllheli on a CME thread?

    While we are; what about turning the loco for the return? Hire a crane to pick it up and spin it round?
     
    已获得sycamore的支持.
  13. neildimmer

    neildimmer Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2008-06-06
    帖子:
    9,075
    支持:
    1,126
    so what is expected to haul the CME next Saturday, will it be Tangmere?
     
  14. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2014-06-08
    帖子:
    15,551
    支持:
    11,955
    所在地:
    Wnxx
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Makes a change from a livery debate though doesn’t it?
     
    已获得John Petley, acorb, MellishR另外3人的支持.
  15. Waterbuck

    Waterbuck Member

    注册日期:
    2009-04-26
    帖子:
    885
    支持:
    611
    性别:
    所在地:
    West Yorkshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    'Old Smokey' and one of the 'twins' would be nice :Pompus:
     
  16. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2006-05-12
    帖子:
    19,232
    支持:
    17,566
    性别:
    所在地:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I suppose there is a big difference between CDL'ing a short rake of mk1's for the Jacobite vs. CDL's 20-30 mk1's across the whole fleet, would probably also need balance CBA against the cost of air braking 3-4 of the home fleet especially where they mirror other loco's of the same class who have been airbraked by others and thus one assumes the spec is agreed and available for the process.

    I did notice when passing Carnforth last week that the rake that had come back from Southall (which includes the stock in maroon with ladies names which always seemed to get a hell of a lot of use) was shunted away down the sidings to the extreme south where the demic RES stock was previously stored so possible just moved up from Southall for storage rather than any CDL work.
     
  17. jamesd

    jamesd Member

    注册日期:
    2009-08-24
    帖子:
    641
    支持:
    354
    所在地:
    S Wales
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Potentially good news for heritage railways though if a large amount of Mk1's in running order suddenly come on the market if WCRC decide to concentrate on Mk2's?
     
  18. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    注册日期:
    2009-05-30
    帖子:
    22,589
    支持:
    22,715
    所在地:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As far as the CME is concerned and its variations, I really think that only properly kitted out Mark 1's are the future for this route as the journey is all about the locomotive up front and the scenery. Both are enhanced by a decent view rather than through a glorified port hole plus the sound of what is working up front.

    I recognise that other journeys do not necessarily have that requirement. For example, I heard little of the softly spoken Tornado on the Top Gear trip because that was more about the pace of it all although decent sized windows did make for good milepost spotting.
     
    已获得gricerdon, Paul42, alastair另外1人的支持.
  19. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2006-05-12
    帖子:
    19,232
    支持:
    17,566
    性别:
    所在地:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Ultimately there are several facets to the market, and to be honest WCR and RTC will have a much better idea of what their customers want and will sustain. Yes there are enthusiasts who will desire what you note above, but there are also others who want to see the scenery and the steam, and get irritated by fellow travellers having the windows open in the wind and rain and the condensation in Mk1's both obscuring the view and also dripping down onto the tables.

    As with all of this WCR will no doubt be doing careful CBA on what the market can and will sustain, IIRC someone noted above that actually charters don't make up a huge amount of their revenues and thus is it worth the hassles and cost, especially as IIRC its also been noted that potentially Mk1's days on the main line are time limited CDL'ed or not.

    I dunno what it said previously, but I see on the WCR website both the Dalesman and Pendle Dalesman pages note 'vintage carriages' and note Mk1's or Mk2's, also worth noting that even the newest Mk2's are 50 years old next year (a feat that the youngest Mk1's only reached in 2013), so can probably be classed as vintage now!
     
  20. neildimmer

    neildimmer Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2008-06-06
    帖子:
    9,075
    支持:
    1,126

    just received ticket, confirmed as Tangmere
     

分享此页面