If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Bulleid Pacifics - Past or Present

Тема в разделе 'Steam Traction', создана пользователем 34007, 13 май 2008.

  1. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    14 янв 2006
    Сообщения:
    8.862
    Симпатии:
    9.255
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    Адрес:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Probably because there's not a lot of need for class 6. Class 5s are good for most slower passenger services, anything faster or heavier use a class 7.

    The main purpose seems to have been to produce a Pacific with a wide firebox but with an axle load of less than 20 tons. A Brit is about half a ton over that limit so can restrict their usage. A Clan is still heavier than a WC/BoB though.
     
    ragl и Johnb нравится это.
  2. alexl102

    alexl102 Member Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    1 мар 2019
    Сообщения:
    630
    Симпатии:
    471
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Thought I’d posted this the other day but evidently not - I always assumed the Clans were intended to replace the likes of the Jubilees and Scots.
     
  3. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    25 авг 2007
    Сообщения:
    35.831
    Симпатии:
    22.269
    Род занятий:
    Training moles
    Адрес:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Clan - Class 6. Scot - Class 7. Hardly a like for like replacement.
     
    MellishR нравится это.
  4. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    16 апр 2009
    Сообщения:
    8.911
    Симпатии:
    5.847
    Also the Scots had been recently "rebuilt" with largely new major components, so would not have been due for replacement for a fair while. If the Clans had a potential role it was as replacements for elderly Class 6 locos but with wide fireboxes to deal with poorer quality coal. Weren't even the Standard Class 5s originally going to have wide fireboxes? However, if steam had remained in service long enough for a lot of the pre-nationalisation loco stock to have been withdrawn, there can't have been many, if any, potential Clan duties that could not have been worked by either Britannias or Class 5s.

    BTW, shouldn't this discussion be on the Clan thread?
     
  5. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    8 дек 2014
    Сообщения:
    19.260
    Симпатии:
    12.513
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Rather than build the Clans,, why didn't BR, just relocate some rebuilt light Pacific's to Scotland, didn't they have a lower axle loading compared to the clans? and with electrification in full swing, by then, not so many would have been needed for the SW div's needs
     
    MellishR нравится это.
  6. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    16 апр 2009
    Сообщения:
    8.911
    Симпатии:
    5.847
    Thank you for (a) a good question and (b) bringing this thread back to its proper subject. We will probably never know what went on the minds of Riddles and his team on this particular might-have-been.
     
  7. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    8 июн 2014
    Сообщения:
    15.551
    Симпатии:
    11.955
    Адрес:
    Wnxx
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That was a consideration for doing the same on the Eastern Region, I do think things like familiarity amongst crew’s and engineering staff comes into consideration, don’t forget it’s another load of spares to have in the stores, I know the 1st 10 Merchant Navy boilers were built in Glasgow but how familiar would ex LMS or LNER workshops familiar with things like welded steel fireboxes at the time?
    For another example were the 16xx tanks allocated to far north for working the Dornoch Branch still sent south for overhauls?
     
    Hirn нравится это.
  8. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    3 дек 2014
    Сообщения:
    15.537
    Симпатии:
    18.382
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Адрес:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Some did go to the GE section when the Britannias were withdrawn after some cases of axle movement were discovered. I think they were quickly returned!
     
  9. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    25 авг 2007
    Сообщения:
    35.831
    Симпатии:
    22.269
    Род занятий:
    Training moles
    Адрес:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Some went before the Brits were introduced IIRC in order for ER to assess what a class 7 could achieve. There’s a bit about it in Gerry Fiennes book.
     
  10. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    25 авг 2007
    Сообщения:
    35.831
    Симпатии:
    22.269
    Род занятий:
    Training moles
    Адрес:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    A day with 34081 in a temporary guise. Support it if you can as the NVR wagon group are a great bunch.
    IMG_1257.jpeg
     
    Romsey, ragl, Johnme101 и 2 другим нравится это.
  11. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    14 янв 2006
    Сообщения:
    8.862
    Симпатии:
    9.255
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    Адрес:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The Gricing Owl, clinker, CH 19 и 4 другим нравится это.
  12. Paul Grant

    Paul Grant Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    6 окт 2010
    Сообщения:
    1.524
    Симпатии:
    1.120
    Адрес:
    Fife
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Saw some postings over on FB about this happening but didn't want to post about it till it was confirmed by Bluebell/ Bulleid Society.
     
  13. Sunnieboy

    Sunnieboy New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    25 фев 2012
    Сообщения:
    105
    Симпатии:
    159
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired
    Адрес:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sir Keith Park has left the building

    Sunnie[​IMG]

    Sent from my SM-P610 using Tapatalk
     
    goldfish, green five, Johnb и 13 другим нравится это.
  14. Paul42

    Paul42 Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    17 июл 2006
    Сообщения:
    6.092
    Симпатии:
    4.465
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    East Grinstead
    Screenshot_20240520-184905.png
     

    Вложения:

    goldfish, silversteellady, decauville1126 и 10 другим нравится это.
  15. Hirn

    Hirn Member

    Дата регистрации:
    11 авг 2015
    Сообщения:
    512
    Симпатии:
    320
    Пол:
    Мужской
    There were in fact big problems with the boilers through until about the late 1950s with wholesale firebox replacement and lowering the boiler pressure from 280 psi to 250 psi was presumably an attempt to solve this.

    The solution was to adopt the hugely successful Treatment Integral Armand - 'TIA" - as developed by Louis Armand for the SNCF and rolled out across France during the war under the occupation. This treated the water in the boiler and enabled the French Railways to practically close all their boiler maintenance shops, the post war American built 141R 2-8-2s never had replacement boilers.

    Both the Bulleid Pacifics and the 141Rs had steel fireboxes which were common abroad - indeed standard in North America. At 300 psi boiler pressure which was used in American and German locomotives you must have steel fireboxes - copper does not retain enough strength at the higher temperature that goes with the pressure - but the steel fireboxes do require good water treatment.
     
    Dag Bonnedal и MellishR нравится это.
  16. Hirn

    Hirn Member

    Дата регистрации:
    11 авг 2015
    Сообщения:
    512
    Симпатии:
    320
    Пол:
    Мужской
    North British certainly supplied the first 10 inner fireboxes and it seems they very probably had some design input: steel fire boxes are stiffer than copper and the stays need to be twice as long - which the Merchant Navy boilers had - round the inner firebox. This was apparently made smaller to go inside the outer firebox and the grate area was 48 square feet - if you do the calculations for how big the grate area would have been with a copper firebox and shorter stays you get 50 square feet. As Bulleid had had quite a lot to with the Cock of the North on the LNER before he came to the Southern and the original scheme for what became the Merchant Navies was for a 2-8-2 with poppet valve gear likely it had a 50 sq ft grate too
    Invaluably making them for export North British knew the tricks with a steel firebox and presumably explained to Cocks who was recruited for the design of the Merchant Navies that the extra stay length was needful. There were problems with the Merchant Navy fireboxes before the water treatment was fixed but not quite the stay and cracking problems that have happened with the steel firebox on the boiler for Tornado.

    Whether North British supplied anything more to Eastleigh than the inner fireboxes I am not sure but would be glad to know if they did.

    NB The fire boxes of the Light Pacifics did crack in the rear corners of the outer fire boxes. Their boilers had a light weight foundation ring made of bent plate and not a solid ring like the Merchant Navy ones. It had not helped the Merchant Navies which were over their design axle load that with the extra width in the water space the wider foundation ring was distinctly heavier.
     
    Last edited: 22 май 2024
  17. Dag Bonnedal

    Dag Bonnedal New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    28 мар 2012
    Сообщения:
    184
    Симпатии:
    317
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    So true...
    THE big difference between copper and steel fireboxes is that scale bind to steel just like concrete to rebar. Thus a thin layer of scale leads to lower efficiency and slightly thicker scales to overheat of the steel in the boiler. The scales on a copper firebox can be washed away, but not on a steel firebox.
    Water treatment prevent scales from forming and then steel fireboxes are more economical and just as efficient as copper.
     
    Steve нравится это.
  18. Hirn

    Hirn Member

    Дата регистрации:
    11 авг 2015
    Сообщения:
    512
    Симпатии:
    320
    Пол:
    Мужской
    When the original boiler from Meiningen for Tornado was delivered it had been explicitly made clear that if there were any claims against Meingen works should the boiler prove unsatisfactory they would be dismissed if the water treatment had not been good and thorough.
     
  19. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    25 авг 2007
    Сообщения:
    35.831
    Симпатии:
    22.269
    Род занятий:
    Training moles
    Адрес:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    34081 dressed up as 34111 ‘Royal Auxiliary Air Force’ at Wansford for their centenary special. Note the Royal headcode ready for a VVIP on the footplate.
    IMG_1264.jpeg
     
  20. Sunnieboy

    Sunnieboy New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    25 фев 2012
    Сообщения:
    105
    Симпатии:
    159
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired
    Адрес:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sir Keith Park at Corfe Castle first test run photo Graham Froud[​IMG]

    Sent from my SM-P610 using Tapatalk
     

Поделиться этой страницей