If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Rother Valley Railway

本贴由 nine elms fan2012-11-04 发布. 版块名称: Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK

  1. Breva

    Breva Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2010-10-11
    帖子:
    2,382
    支持:
    4,163
    所在地:
    Gloucestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I like the choice of brick - the colour is random. It would look like a new house in a housing estate if all the bricks were the same.
     
    已获得hyboy, Biermeister, Wenlock另外1人的支持.
  2. Miff

    Miff Part of the furniture Friend

    注册日期:
    2008-06-17
    帖子:
    3,043
    支持:
    3,121
    Very impressive - a new landmark building for Robertsbridge and a great facility for the railway.

    But it also somehow reminded me of this:

    "I suppose you know what we mean by a station, it has a corrugated roofing; it is not a Clapham Junction"

    (Col. Stephens, giving evidence at the 1905 public inquiry for the K&ESR’s, never built, Headcorn-Maidstone Extension.)
     
    已获得clinkerBrevaMark Thompson的支持.
  3. Kingscross

    Kingscross Member

    注册日期:
    2009-10-19
    帖子:
    901
    支持:
    631
    性别:
    所在地:
    South West
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes, the brick choice is very good. Anyone know what it's called? I am planning a project it would look good on.
     
  4. mikehartuk

    mikehartuk New Member

    注册日期:
    2007-06-29
    帖子:
    112
    支持:
    533
    性别:
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The architectural style of the new station building at Robertsbridge is designed to follow the same style as the Colonel's station building at Tenterden - including the 'corrugated iron' roof covering. The roof covering we used on the toilet block part of the building erected a few years ago, and now the rest of the building compiles with modern building regulation and looks much as what is on Tenterden building - but with what's around 8 inches of insulation bonded onto the underside of the steel covering. Here they are - delivered to Robertsbridge station yesterday! Mike
     

    附件文件:

    已获得burnham-t, Biermeister, Spitfire另外3人的支持.
  5. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-04-06
    帖子:
    9,794
    支持:
    7,939
    性别:
    职业:
    Thorn in my managers side
    所在地:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    How far is ity from Robertsbridge to Bodiam?
     
  6. mikehartuk

    mikehartuk New Member

    注册日期:
    2007-06-29
    帖子:
    112
    支持:
    533
    性别:
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    3.1/2 mile
     
  7. paul1609

    paul1609 New Member

    注册日期:
    2006-06-09
    帖子:
    80
    支持:
    127
    性别:
    所在地:
    Wittersham, Isle of Oxney
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Have we established the (minus) datum for the buffer stops at Roberts bridge Junction yet Mike?
    I'm not sure where the original zero was either the mainline junction or the KESR/ mainline boundary I guess. The replica 3 1/4 miles post is opposite Bodiam station building.
    I remember finding the pre-preservation (br?) 2 1/2 mile post in the woods before Udiam Farm with Mark Younge during the rebuild. It was only the second one I've seen.
     
  8. mikehartuk

    mikehartuk New Member

    注册日期:
    2007-06-29
    帖子:
    112
    支持:
    533
    性别:
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Paul. The 3.1/2 miles Robertsbridge to Bodiam station I quoted was simply the old general mileage description used by BR. The actual distance from the buffer stops at the new Robertsbridge station to the RVR land boundary short of Bodiam station is 5.399km (3.355 miles). The distance from there to Bodiam level crossing is another 265m so making the new Robertsbridge station buffers to the level crossing circa 3.519 miles (assuming my metres to miles conversion is correct!). Mike Hart
     
    已获得burnham-talastairMiff的支持.
  9. James Hewett

    James Hewett New Member

    注册日期:
    2015-08-19
    帖子:
    148
    支持:
    666
    性别:
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Or indeed (subject to correction) - 3 miles, 4 furlongs, 1 chain and about 2 rods (which I guess is the way they'd have measured it at the time of construction - using real chains too) - Mr H.
    I think I still have one somewhere....
    James
     
    已获得WenlockBiermeisterMark Thompson的支持.
  10. Mark Thompson

    Mark Thompson Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2017-09-10
    帖子:
    1,665
    支持:
    4,129
    性别:
    所在地:
    E sussex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Ah, that warm, analogue sound you can only get from old measurements!
     
    已获得Biermeister, weltrol, DavidW另外3人的支持.
  11. brmp201

    brmp201 Member

    注册日期:
    2010-05-18
    帖子:
    619
    支持:
    969
    性别:
    职业:
    IT Director
    所在地:
    Surrey, UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    For anyone with an hour and a half to kill...

     
    已获得MiffalastairDavidW的支持.
  12. burnham-t

    burnham-t New Member

    注册日期:
    2008-02-26
    帖子:
    114
    支持:
    93
    性别:
    所在地:
    Staplehurst, Kent
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm fairly sure the pre-preservation concrete mileposts aren't BR - they're nothing like anything on the rest of the Southern Region. As a complete guess, I wonder if they date from the W H Austen period (1931-48)? Austen was responsible for the concrete lampposts at Tenterden Town, which don't look very "period" but are a genuine survival from the old company. Incidentally, there were some concrete mileposts put in during the early years after reopening which seemed to o have come out of the same mould as County Council public right of way markers of that era.
     
  13. alastair

    alastair Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2005-11-07
    帖子:
    1,282
    支持:
    801
    Thanks for the link. This is a long but extremely interesting video with loads of photos and plans with detailed explanations of how the level crossings, bridges etc will actually be constructed. Highly recommended for anyone interested in the RVR. I'm struck by the extraordinarily onerous (and expensive!)planning requirements which have to be sorted before construction can really get going. The wanton destruction of Austens Bridge just before RVR acquired the land was simply shocking - I guess I had better not say any more on a public forum! :eek:
     
    已获得Biermeister, Mark Thompson, Miff另外2人的支持.
  14. burnham-t

    burnham-t New Member

    注册日期:
    2008-02-26
    帖子:
    114
    支持:
    93
    性别:
    所在地:
    Staplehurst, Kent
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I was actually surprised the speaker said as much about Austen's Bridge as he did ...
     
  15. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    注册日期:
    2014-12-08
    帖子:
    19,434
    支持:
    12,632
    性别:
    所在地:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I think he let the cat out of the bag, saying out loud what many thought, , They say the track laying is the easy part, looking at the various hurdles that have to be jumped, Cleary, that's the case, There's a mountain of paperwork and permits to be done, even before a single sleeper can be laid,
     
    已获得Mark Thompsonalastair的支持.
  16. Mark Thompson

    Mark Thompson Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2017-09-10
    帖子:
    1,665
    支持:
    4,129
    性别:
    所在地:
    E sussex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    He was quite forthright. But however you slice it, it was a shocking act.
    I found the whole presentation excellent, clear, detailed and unflinching.
    However one does get the distinct impression that the EA has become a sprawling, bloated entity, wielding beaurocratic muscle in almost random fashion, just because it "can".
     
    已获得alastair的支持.
  17. FearOfManchester

    FearOfManchester Member

    注册日期:
    2016-01-24
    帖子:
    367
    支持:
    423
    性别:
    所在地:
    Peak District
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    You would think such an act of contempt and challenge against the due process of ownership handover would stir some keen action from the authorities to maintain faith in the ridiculous buereacracy of it all, what’s the point in following the bloated rules if those rules are not fiercely defended when not followed in such a destructive manner, reward the aggressor with no punishment but continue to load the innocent party with even more bureaucratic pork because it’s the easier thing to do, you see it with all the ‘nothing to see here’ mysterious fires on listed mills and protected civic amenities, normally right after a planning application is denied. Very little action is ever taken.
     
    已获得Mark Thompson的支持.
  18. 21B

    21B Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2009-09-02
    帖子:
    4,064
    支持:
    9,177
    I doubt that’s the attitude of authorities. The act was one of criminal damage and or an environmental crime. I think though that railway might reasonably feel that “least said, soonest mended” applies.
     
    已获得Miffjohnofwessex的支持.
  19. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    注册日期:
    2014-12-08
    帖子:
    19,434
    支持:
    12,632
    性别:
    所在地:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    At the end of the day, as much as it might stick in some people's throats The Railway has to act correctly and be a good neighbour even if your neighbour hates you, and wishes you gone, the railway has to be above it, The best answer to those who carried out the damage, has to be in getting on with repairing or replacing the damaged bridges and to carry on with the programme , and build the line, and afterwards, show the community that the inspectors decision was the right one and that The town, can live with the railway.
     
    已获得MellishRalastairMiff的支持.
  20. Miff

    Miff Part of the furniture Friend

    注册日期:
    2008-06-17
    帖子:
    3,043
    支持:
    3,121
    It seems a pity if no action was taken by the EA for dumping concrete debris in the river, undoubtedly an environmental breach.

    However, in itself, the partial demolition of the bridge may have been no crime since it remained the landowners’ property until the moment RVR took possession of the land.
     
    Last edited: 2025-06-15 , 12:25

分享此页面