If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Fictitious liveries

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Mighty Mogul, Feb 5, 2009.

  1. weltrol

    weltrol Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,842
    Likes Received:
    687
    Yes, we all know the NRM policy on renaming engines, originality, livery,etc....

    \:D/ \:D/
     
  2. stepney60

    stepney60 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    14,400
    Likes Received:
    0
    Since when has Tornado been an NRM engine? :smt017
     
  3. weltrol

    weltrol Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,842
    Likes Received:
    687
    60103/4472 IS a NRM engine

    60163 is a privately owned engine, which has been shedded at the NRM

    Would Brunt like to clarify which kettle he is referring to?
     
  4. Brunt

    Brunt New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry missed type the number meant Tornado 60163
     
  5. Sir Nigel Gresley

    Sir Nigel Gresley Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    148
    Occupation:
    Retired Soldier of Fortune
    Location:
    Dorset
    I remember walking round the sidings at Cranzahl narrow-gauge station (sorry not Sorge!) in East Germany, in 1978, and of the 15 or so coaches present, it was difficult to find two in the same shade of green. Which one of them was in the correct DR coach livery?
     
  6. lostprairie

    lostprairie New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Perhaps an interesting tangent to explore might be whether we in the preservation movement feel we are in the history business or show business?

    You don't get much more fictitious than Thomas, but the little blue b*****d provides many railways with a significant percentage of their gross annual income. Many railways strive to put on events which boast authentic stock/loco combinations and 'recreations' of past events such as last train services etc. - and there's another one - what about loco's wearing the wrong name/number?
     
  7. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    Exactly..

    Which one pays more.. thats the one to be in.
    Show business pays more by far... however that doesnt mean History cannot put on a show (i.e. a gala) however I believe railways need to integrate more with their surroundings..the successful ones already have (WSR , NYMR etc and look how their streets ahead of some of the others)
     
  8. TonyW

    TonyW New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    9
    75069 at the SVR was not painted green while in BR service, it was always black.
     
  9. Sir Nigel Gresley

    Sir Nigel Gresley Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    148
    Occupation:
    Retired Soldier of Fortune
    Location:
    Dorset
    Owing to the lateness of the hour, I do not have time to research in depth, but stainless steel numbers & lettering, with no side valence, together with Garter Blue livery was certainly applied to some, if not all, A4's as they were overhauled after WWII. The stainless steel numbers were even carried after renumbering into the 1 - 34 series, and, after nationalisation a painted "E" prefix was added, although the stainless steel "LNER" on the tender was replaced by a painted/transfer(?) "British Railways". Mallard ran in this condition in the 1948 Loco Exchanges, of which there are several oft-published photos.
    4495 Golden Fleece (and others?) even ran in black with stainless steel numbers/letters (and no valence and no chime whistle).
     
  10. BillR

    BillR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,556
    Likes Received:
    43
  11. conireland

    conireland Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    1
  12. david1984

    david1984 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,910
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Birmingham
    Why not ? as 8P's thery would of worn it at some point and there's very few loco's that can authentically wear BR Blue, underated livery IMO.
     
  13. polmadie

    polmadie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,242
    Likes Received:
    472
    I have always thought that this was a good idea. Instead of galas having lots of guest locos, why not renumber their own fleet. This would be a lot cheaper than the transport costs incurred bringing in visiting locos. It adds variety and there will be lots like me that will travel to see these long lost locos.
     
  14. arthur maunsell

    arthur maunsell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    by the fire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    i guess by now 4472 and others are more accurate in inaccurate livery than original, having worn them so long...
     
  15. conireland

    conireland Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wouldn't that defeat the point of having a 'special' loco if you would just renumber another one to suit?
     
  16. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    How many locomotives were really painted BR Blue, and how long did this colour scheme last ?

    I think locomotives do look nice in Blue and it's nice to see in preservation, but was this colour scheme widespread ?
     
  17. Sheff

    Sheff Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,059
    Likes Received:
    3,138
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Engineer & Heritage Volunteer
    Location:
    N Warks
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That's amazing - no idea how you'd do that but it looks very convincing. For me that's the only decent alternative to the LNER green. Both look right, whereas that dull ex-Gasworks green looks awful on non-GWR loco's. It's OK on BR classes of course, as they never ran in anything else, but how about a video of say a Brit or D-of-G in LMS red, or LNER green, or BR Blue - that would be worth seeing! (Though I can't imagine apple green on a Belpaire box for some reason).
     
  18. Guest

    Guest Part of the furniture Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,614
    Likes Received:
    21
    Occupation:
    Occasional
    Location:
    G C & N S
    I understand we are to get blue then brunswick green so yah boo sucks to the lot of you :smt077
     
  19. Sheff

    Sheff Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,059
    Likes Received:
    3,138
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Engineer & Heritage Volunteer
    Location:
    N Warks
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Just showed it to Mrs S , she wants it in red with white furry "trimmings" !
     
  20. Orion

    Orion Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,355
    Likes Received:
    5
    Occupation:
    Pensioner!
    Location:
    North-west London
    I think most, but not all, the 8P locos were in blue and many of the A3 class.

    The reason the livery was withdrawn was that it didn't wear well. I would imagine that today's two pack paints would be better but there are photos of clean blue engines that look dreadful. The changeover to brunswick green started in 1951.

    'Sir Nigel Gresley' looks great in blue, really good.

    Regards
     

Share This Page