If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

4-wheel carriage wheel size

Discussion in 'Heritage Rolling Stock' started by Morton, Jun 1, 2010.

  1. Morton

    Morton New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can any member say if the wheel size of 4-wheel carriages would have been larger than that on 4-wheel box vans.

    Alternately what is the wheel size on preserved 4-wheel carriages.

    Thanks in advance, Morton
     
  2. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    12,732
    Likes Received:
    11,848
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Carriage wheels tended to be larger than wagon/van wheels but that is a generality. RCH wagon wheels are 3'-0" and coach wheels tended to be in the range of 3'-6"-4'-0" diameter, usually the former.
     
  3. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,801
    Likes Received:
    64,484
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Also bear in mind most 4 wheel carriages in preservation aren't on their original frames and wheels.

    (When sold out of railway service, the bodies and underframes were generally separated and the underframes reused by the railway company, with only the body sold. 70 or 80 years later, only the bodies survive for preservation, so generally they are mated with redundant van underframes - on the Blubell and IoWSR at least, very often ex-SR designed parcels vans. Which is one reason given why the Chatham 3rd 114 on the Bluebell is so uncomfortable - the van springs are 8ft long, whereas when originally built, it would have had rather softer 12ft springs so would have ridden better at speed.)

    Tom
     
  4. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    12,732
    Likes Received:
    11,848
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Those spring lengths quoted are quite something! Are you sure that your tape measure isn't missing the last few feet!!!
     
  5. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,801
    Likes Received:
    64,484
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Just testing that people were awake at the back... A slip of the typing finger, though the general point remains - the springs on the replacement van underframes are rather shorter (probably about 4ft, not 8ft) and thus give a stiffer ride than such coaches originally would have had.

    Tom
     
  6. MarkinDurham

    MarkinDurham Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,229
    Likes Received:
    999
    Location:
    Durham
    Regarding van wheel diameters, if vans were permitted to be attached to passenger trains, didn't they have to have wheels at least 3'6" diameter, and be oil lubricated? ('XP' markings on them?)
     
  7. Muppet

    Muppet Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2007
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    North Yorkshire
    Express vans certainly had larger wheels - we have two LMS XP vans.
     
  8. chopshopjohn

    chopshopjohn New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Stafford
    I believe a common size used was 3' 7" . Anything much over 3' 9" could lead to the complication of having to provide 'pockets' in the floor as the buffer centreline, and usually the centreline of the undeframe was nominally only 3' 5 1/2" above rail level
     

Share This Page