If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

6023 King Edward 11

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by cct man, Feb 1, 2010.

  1. No.7

    No.7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,632
    Likes Received:
    122
    A king is only a bit heavier than the class 47 that 60007 hauled around all December with gross loads of over 580 tons and that didn’t seem to hold the A4 back noticeably!
     
  2. Steve from GWR

    Steve from GWR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    14
    Tornado once it's also in blue
     
  3. Steamage

    Steamage Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    4,748
    Likes Received:
    1,121
    Location:
    Oxford
    6023 + 5029 in her current "Great British Western Railways" livery would be quite an interesting combination.
     
  4. Dan Hill

    Dan Hill Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,749
    Likes Received:
    826
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Brick Machine Operator
    Location:
    Haywards Heath
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    They did but on The Mayflower when we got back to Exeter 60019's headboard and front was covered in soot. I feel sorry for those who had to clean the loco afterwards. I would however like 6023 and 60007 because both in BR Blue will look great.
     
  5. polmadie

    polmadie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,242
    Likes Received:
    472
    [video=youtube;QRLonJ_sIFQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRLonJ_sIFQ[/video]

    How about 6023 and 6233? Close comparison here 5029+46229 before 46229 had that ugly tin bath attached to her.
     
  6. Mighty Mogul

    Mighty Mogul Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,462
    Likes Received:
    6
    Occupation:
    Artist
    Location:
    7037
    Not that I'm keen on these slightly incongruous ideas for locomotive pairings, but I would imagine 6023 + 6201 would be appropriate because of the similarities of design between the locos.
     
  7. Neil_Scott

    Neil_Scott Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2008
    Messages:
    3,155
    Likes Received:
    302
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Railway servant
    Location:
    Worcester
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    828 and 6023 on the Severn Valley in September would be a nice blue double-header. Interesting to compare to the two shades when they meet.
     
  8. Mighty Mogul

    Mighty Mogul Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,462
    Likes Received:
    6
    Occupation:
    Artist
    Location:
    7037
    Should be quite harmonious given the BR blue was based on the CR livery.
     
  9. guard_jamie

    guard_jamie Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,503
    Likes Received:
    27
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Signalman
    Location:
    Herefordshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Would have to be Bewdley-Kidderminster only due to the weight limit on Victoria Bridge. The largest things that can go across double headed are small prairies, I believe!
     
  10. jane

    jane Guest

    i Would still love to see the two kings together even if it was only from bewdley- kidderminster;
    long live the kings;

    all the best
    jane ;
     
  11. Neil_Scott

    Neil_Scott Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2008
    Messages:
    3,155
    Likes Received:
    302
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Railway servant
    Location:
    Worcester
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I expect 6023 to be quite lighter than 828. 828 carries the CR's 1895 blue which is quite a deep blue, very similar to Oxford Blue. The lighter shade that most people associate with the Caley came in about 1905 or so.
     
  12. Neil_Scott

    Neil_Scott Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2008
    Messages:
    3,155
    Likes Received:
    302
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Railway servant
    Location:
    Worcester
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Solution: If 828 acts as pilot (LM thinking here, not GW, so 828 leading), stop short of the bridge, detach 828 and run over followed by 6023 plus train and reattach once clear of the bridge. On the Speyside line that was the order when Pickergill Bogies (4-4-0s) were double heading trains as the bridges weren't passed for double-heading with these engines but according to an old Keith Passed Cleaner they just used to charge over them thinking that if they went faster over the bridge then it wouldn't matter...!
     
  13. Pannier Man

    Pannier Man Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    67
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Network Rail - Retired
    Location:
    Reading
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The amount of coats and TLC going into the paint finnish will probably make 6023 out of gauge, never mind the cab, safety valve and chimney height!!

    (LOL, just poking fun, honest, they'll get me back I'm sure.)
     
  14. Kje7812

    Kje7812 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,846
    Likes Received:
    1,205
    Location:
    Kidderminster/ York
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    In normal operations, I do believe you are right, but if authority is granted, more can double head. For instance, the last train of 2010's ASG was doubled headed by 3205 and 7802 (7802 having a 4000 gallon tender) which has a comined weight about 70 tons heavier than 2 4575s. That said, 6023 and 828 would still, probably, be too heavy for them to allow.
     
  15. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,762
    Likes Received:
    5,890
    Ivatts moguals/ tanks can too in any combination! Can have a biggun on the back as well as long the it is not on the bridge at the same time!!!
     
  16. jake1971

    jake1971 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just to let you know that 6023 moved under her own power for the 1st time since 1962 today. Tests have highlighted a few minor niggles, which considering the state she arrived in way back in March 1990 is pretty amazing really. roll on the launch in April.
     
  17. Steve from GWR

    Steve from GWR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    14
    Thanks Jake, that's great news. What an achievement!
     
  18. MarkinDurham

    MarkinDurham Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,229
    Likes Received:
    999
    Location:
    Durham
    Well done to all concerned. Fantastic job.

    Mark
     
  19. acorb

    acorb Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,950
    Likes Received:
    4,379
    Location:
    Powys
    That's fabulous news, big congrats to all involved. Incidently I think there is a weight restriction on an overbridge between Highley & Arley which also effects larger locos/double headers. This couldn't have always been the case as this video of sadly missed 7819 & 75069 from 1989 shows (worth it for the demolition Eardington alone!), also there's a clip of 48773 and 34027 double heading from the same chap, who has a brilliant selection of archive SVR vids on youtube. They used to work the locos back then!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbaCZtyx9bY
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bbrWvd5siU
     
  20. guard_jamie

    guard_jamie Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,503
    Likes Received:
    27
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Signalman
    Location:
    Herefordshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    In reply to Neil_Scott's suggestion, this is actually an accepted method of taking otherwise over-heavy loco combinations over VB, however as far as I know it is never used on public services, due to the extra time involved - which also will affect the whole timetable of course.
    It may also be that the rules do not allow it with fare-paying passengers aboard, due to the stringent rules on one train in a section at any one time, although that is conjecture on my part.
     

Share This Page