If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Its safer by road ???

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by ADB968008, Nov 17, 2013.

  1. irwellsteam

    irwellsteam Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    176
    Occupation:
    -
    Location:
    -
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/crayzy_ray/3393567178/

    (not my picture)
     
  2. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,834
    Likes Received:
    22,271
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

    You've pretty much answered your own question there.
     
  3. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,834
    Likes Received:
    22,271
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

    I doubt many loco owners would like their locos dropped even the 18 inches you are talking about.
     
  4. dan.lank

    dan.lank Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2009
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    312
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Haywards Heath
    From what I remember-Baxter from the Bluebell fell off a lorry in Croydon and ended on its side. 6023 lost a safety valve bonnet. Royal Scot got chargrilled. One of the A4s had real problems a few years back with its cartazzi truck as a result of lowloadering. Evening Star had its nameplates nicked while it was at a service station. Sir Lamiel had its whistle ripped out on some telephone cabling on its way to the Bluebell. I seem to remember 76079 nearly came off a low loader when the road collapsed under it? There's a fair few stories out there, but I suppose the flip side is that lowloaders aren't subject to track access charges and weekend line closures... My guess is that there are pros and cons either way, but maybe on balance keeping locos on rails might be the ideal!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  5. THE MELTER

    THE MELTER Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    63
    Occupation:
    ENGINEER
    Location:
    BLACK COUNTRY
    For me! i will be happy when it can hold steam, pull trains and do what it is supposed to do, be the flagship of the NRM,
    anything else is a bonus, i vote we leave them alone to get on with it, keep our noses out, polish our cameras if that is your thing and wait.
    nothing, NOTHING we say or do will speed that up,lets stop looking for reasons to say they are doing it wrong.
    The people who have it now are tried and tested competent engineers, leave them be and she'll be right.

    The Melter
     
  6. buseng

    buseng Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    4,801
    Likes Received:
    349
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Tilehurst, Reading, Berks.
    Didn't a Black 5 demolish a set of traffic lights in Keighley(I think) recently?
     
  7. 45581

    45581 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,120
    Likes Received:
    652
    Not just a set of traffic lights but also one of the entrance gates to the Ingrow station site while en route to Ilford(?) for tyre turning this year.
     
  8. 46236

    46236 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    lord of the manor
    Location:
    city of gold
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    not the black 5, the lorry did the damage
     
  9. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    so we've managed to list out every insurance claim since the 1980s but so far no facts to support that going by road is more damaging to a loco ?
     
  10. 21B

    21B Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,893
    Likes Received:
    8,654
    It is a bit of a contentious issue, so you may find that there are not many willing to say much. From my experience 9Fs are very difficult to move by road and a significant number of the moves result in a broken rear spring. I doubt any loco has suffered frame damage, but there is no doubt that getting on and off a low loader is not what steam loco designers intended, and the longer the loco the worse the problem is. The problem is much less acute with a diesel, and indeed for locos that haven't been on the mainline for a while road transport for a diesel is preferable. The best thing is to use a very long ramp and a gentle movement. The MHR Thomas has few problems.
     
  11. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,834
    Likes Received:
    22,271
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Those of us who own non main line approved locos have no choice in the matter, it's road or nothing.
     
  12. pete2hogs

    pete2hogs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    721
    Likes Received:
    418
    And surely that is entirely correct. A contractor reports to the people who gave him the contract - that is, the NRM - not the public at large.

    Whether the NRM has an obligation to inform or not is a matter for the NRM, not Rileys.
     
  13. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,793
    Likes Received:
    64,460
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Can we have a new thread for "Flying Scotsman discussion (ex-Is it safer by road (ex Flying Scotsman discussion))" :)

    Tom (fetching coat...)
     
  14. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    22,590
    Likes Received:
    22,718
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    A risk assessment based on common sense would suggest that if it's possible to move a Pacific/4-6-0 locomotive by rail rather than road then that's the most sensible option. I can think of one loco group who have never moved their treasure by road and still have, I believe, no intention of doing so.
     
  15. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,834
    Likes Received:
    22,271
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

    The loco must therefore be passed for main line running, a luxury not open to many locomotive owners, unless of course they are heritage railway based and have no intention of ever moving from home base.
     
  16. Corbs

    Corbs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,719
    Likes Received:
    763
    IIRC there was also an occasion when a jinty was being transported, the lorry behind the low loader ran away, climbed the trailer and rammed the jinty into the low loader's cab?
     
  17. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    22,590
    Likes Received:
    22,718
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes my example is a main line loco and I accept that heritage railway based locos don't generally have the luxury of moving from their home base other than by road. Given all that, I remain uncertain that sending our bigger heritage examples by road anywhere is a good idea. I understand all the advantages of different visiting locos etc etc but this may come at a cost that is not immediately apparent, and that is the dilemma.
     
  18. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,072
    Likes Received:
    5,361
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    For the record, it was GWR No. 813, but the principles the same.
     
  19. Avonside1563

    Avonside1563 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    244
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Bolton's Sidings, just behind the running shed!
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Does a loco have to be passed for mainline running if it is going to be towed cold with relevant motion taken down rather than in steam? IIRC there is a lesser exam to allow for this sort of movement. After all, Mallard was moved this way only a few months ago.
     
  20. THE MELTER

    THE MELTER Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    63
    Occupation:
    ENGINEER
    Location:
    BLACK COUNTRY
    There also used to be a lesser degree of certification for industrials too,
    like for NCB or CEGB locomotives travelling around with a brake van in tow from one pit or power station to another.
    This happened as late as 1977 (the last time i saw it),
    so whats the chance of getting a limited mainline ticket so that i can run Colin McAndrew and a GWR toad with the family on board
    (so sorry i meant suport crew)
    from Cannock chase to Rhyl for a day out. (via Crewe of course)
    LOL i would pay good money for that i can tell you.

    The Melter
     

Share This Page