If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

FR & WHR & WHHR News

本贴由 AndrewT2012-07-17 发布. 版块名称: Narrow Gauge Railways

  1. AndrewT

    AndrewT Member

    注册日期:
    2007-10-16
    帖子:
    735
    支持:
    50
    职业:
    F&WHR Spin Doctor
    所在地:
    Maentwrog
    A few pics from Saturday showing progress at Harbour Station.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
  2. Baldwin

    Baldwin Guest

    Is this the larger rail section as per the WHR ?
     
  3. Standard 4MT

    Standard 4MT Member

    注册日期:
    2012-03-31
    帖子:
    318
    支持:
    53
    性别:
    职业:
    Photographer/IT MCSE/NYMR/ex Police/&Train Manager
    所在地:
    Wales/Scarborough
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Think roughly, It is showing Porthmadoc station extended with new track layouts to accommodate both the FR and WHR at the same beach head location. Option is then onwards to Blaneau Ffestiniog Station or run round to return to Carnarfon.
     
  4. Steve B

    Steve B Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2008-06-20
    帖子:
    2,167
    支持:
    1,579
    所在地:
    Shropshire
    According to the F&WHR Facebook pages, they are using ex MOD 75lb rail in some of the station area. They normally use 60lb rail on their main lines.

    Steve B
     
  5. Baldwin

    Baldwin Guest

    I did prefer the smaller rail section, the characters not the same, just have to get used to it i suppose, i hope the TR never gets around to doing it like this.
     
  6. MuzTrem

    MuzTrem Member

    注册日期:
    2011-03-13
    帖子:
    976
    支持:
    1,279
    To be honest, given the extent of changes that had taken place at Harbour even before the most recent alterations, personally I'd have said the rail section used was the least of anyone's worries from a "character" point of view!

    On the plus side, though, I reckon that FfR and WHR trains side-by-side at the platform end will make an impressive sight once the work is done!
     
  7. Baldwin

    Baldwin Guest

    I suppose you're right.
     
  8. AndrewT

    AndrewT Member

    注册日期:
    2007-10-16
    帖子:
    735
    支持:
    50
    职业:
    F&WHR Spin Doctor
    所在地:
    Maentwrog
    It's actually ex-IoM 75lb rail. Does that make it any better?
     
    已获得dampflok的支持.
  9. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    Well, if the choice is between new rail and no new rail, the choice is obvious unless some plutocrat can be found to underwrite the cost of a special rolling. I understand that the closure of the Vivarais was partly as a result of the then operators refusing to countenance the use of rail not of the original weight. Such stuff is no longer produced.

    P.H.
     
  10. meeee

    meeee Member

    注册日期:
    2006-03-28
    帖子:
    886
    支持:
    1,382
    Brand new flatbottom rail can and has been purchased from Poland in the past for the F&WHR. However the 50lb bullhead or 46lb doublehead rail traditionally used on the Ffestiniog has not been in production for a very long time. Apart from short sections at Penrhyn and Minffordd the mainline is now all flat bottom and is likely to stay that way unless someone rich sponsors some new rollers.

    It is a shame that we can't preserve the traditional pway as it is one of the many interesting features of the FR but sadly the bullhead rail we have is only really suitable for sidings now.
     
    已获得AndrewT的支持.
  11. david1984

    david1984 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2005-09-13
    帖子:
    12,910
    支持:
    1,387
    性别:
    所在地:
    Birmingham
    To be fair, I doubt most people would notice the different type of rail unless pointed out, isn't a big visual difference like say concrete sleepers.
     
  12. John Stewart

    John Stewart Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-09-22
    帖子:
    4,206
    支持:
    2,072
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    Hilton, Derby
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The perseverance with bullhead rail is one of the many technical blind alleys pursued by the railways in Britain. Not until the 1950s did the then nationalised system come round to the use of flat bottom rail as the rest of the world had decades earlier. What was the reason for this "tradition"? The old British attitude of "not invented here" that led us to British Standards at odds with everyone else's.
     
    已获得AndrewTFelix Holtpaulhitch的支持.
  13. david1984

    david1984 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2005-09-13
    帖子:
    12,910
    支持:
    1,387
    性别:
    所在地:
    Birmingham
    Does flat bottom offer any advantage over bullhead ?, may just have been a case of, if it aint broke, don't fix it.
     
  14. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    As I understand it Vignoles rail (just to emphasise that "it was invented here"!) is, weight for weight, more resistant to side forces than bull head. There is also a matter of not having to pay for chairs as well as not having to knock chair keys in periodically.

    Forgive me but I was strongly reminded of the various reasons put forward on another thread as to why steam locomotive draughting systems didn't need to be improved which, I am afraid, were coded versions of "not invented here".

    P.H.
     
    已获得AndrewT的支持.
  15. John Stewart

    John Stewart Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-09-22
    帖子:
    4,206
    支持:
    2,072
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    Hilton, Derby
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's lighter (taking chair weight into account), cheaper, easier to lay and doesn't need the keys tapping into the chairs at regular intervals. I'm no metallurgist but I think that flat bottom might not have been too good in wrought iron; when steel became normal bullhead was kept because the chairs were there. Would a permanent way person like to comment?
     
  16. SillyBilly

    SillyBilly Member

    注册日期:
    2007-05-19
    帖子:
    512
    支持:
    6
    职业:
    Student
    所在地:
    Penrhyndeudraeth
    A very well respected retired member of the FR PWay staff is known to have suggested bullhead is a more suitable rail for the FR's tight curves as the profile lends itself better to flexing.
     
  17. Baldwin

    Baldwin Guest

    One solution could always be to ballast up to the top of the rails, no one would know !
     
  18. NGChrisW

    NGChrisW New Member

    注册日期:
    2011-10-18
    帖子:
    177
    支持:
    117
    所在地:
    Surrey
    I believe this is why Network Rail have retained bullhead rail in some of the tracks between Vauxhall and London Waterloo. (Some of which has been renewed in bullhead fairly recently).

    Chris
     
  19. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    This also camouflages any defects which may develop. A practice which was once used by main line companies but which ceased for this reason.

    PH
     
  20. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-09-27
    帖子:
    5,294
    支持:
    3,599
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Can anyone explain the purpose of the short spur that seems to go to the signal box door? Delivery of the signalman's tea in inclement weather perhaps?
     
    已获得dampflok的支持.

分享此页面