If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Esk Valley 22/3

本贴由 henrywinskill2014-03-22 发布. 版块名称: What's Going On

  1. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    注册日期:
    2009-05-30
    帖子:
    22,592
    支持:
    22,725
    所在地:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'm not all that certain that this engine enjoys running tender first as I recall that in this direction it is tricky getting the right draught on the fire. I was once on it when it ran sweetly to Kyle but was then a dog coming back, tender first.
     
  2. Shep Woolley

    Shep Woolley Well-Known Member Friend

    注册日期:
    2007-02-21
    帖子:
    2,320
    支持:
    10,432
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired
    Not that well known 'Safari' wearing White Hunter on the prowl with his helpers, despite them a lovely position and shot Stuart
     
  3. Pjamie

    Pjamie New Member

    注册日期:
    2010-07-12
    帖子:
    77
    支持:
    0
    Will run fine in any direction if fired correctly. Yesterday was just very bad coal.
     
  4. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    注册日期:
    2009-05-30
    帖子:
    22,592
    支持:
    22,725
    所在地:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes indeed. That's what makes her a tad unpredictable but as you say, no problem at all when everything is in her favour.
     
  5. mrKnowwun

    mrKnowwun Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-10-22
    帖子:
    4,366
    支持:
    2,823
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    West Byfleet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    And here is my vid.

     
    已获得Waterbuck的支持.
  6. RayMason

    RayMason Member

    注册日期:
    2009-09-25
    帖子:
    357
    支持:
    236
    性别:
    职业:
    Company secretary. Finance director
    所在地:
    Dawlish Warren
    Did I enjoy this trip?YES!!!
     
  7. 242A1

    242A1 Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2006-12-03
    帖子:
    1,561
    支持:
    1,304
    The failure of fuel suppliers to deliver a consistent quality of product was one of the factors behind the decision to eliminate steam. Worse perhaps was the unwillingness of the railway companies to test the coal purchased and draw up acceptable limits for their suppliers. Could you imagine running your car on a fuel whose qualities varied as much as the coal supplied to the railways?
    In spite of the problems faced this turned out to be a well enjoyed tour. Congratulations to those involved and shame on the company that supplied the fuel used on the K4.
     
  8. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    注册日期:
    2005-09-11
    帖子:
    36,449
    支持:
    9,909
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    所在地:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'm afraid your analogy for petrol/diesel and coal is way off the mark.
    Petrol/Diesel are manufactured to a strictly controlled spec which can be adjusted minutely during the process, coal is dug out of the ground and can vary from seam to seam.
    Coal supplied to loco owners etc is just a very small section of the market so suppliers are not going to spend money on testing it themselves when all other users are reasonably happy with what they get.
    If a railway company buy coal then test it, then find it to be below spec, and what spec is that? what do they do with it.
    If they go to the supplier and ask to get a sample, take it for test, wait a couple of weeks for this to happen, are they in any position to expect the supplier to have kept that stock to one side in case it's OK?
     
  9. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    注册日期:
    2009-05-30
    帖子:
    22,592
    支持:
    22,725
    所在地:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    But I am told that if you pay top dollar you do get better quality. There are many reasons why that is a sensible thing to do and if that extra cost is passed on to the customer then my guess is that there would be no objections. I'm not implying anything about Saturday's coal and anyway, I would hope that the customer/supplier relationship should be such that if the coal is not fit for purpose then there would be financial redress. even though that is too late to help the situation.
     
  10. 242A1

    242A1 Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2006-12-03
    帖子:
    1,561
    支持:
    1,304
    Ralph, how come you infer that I am merely addressing coal supplied during the preservation era?

    Even when the railways were a major consumer of coal as fuel, little was done to make sure that the product supplied fell within acceptable quality limits. True liquid fuels are easier to produce to a specification but coal does not need to be supplied within such narrow limits. It does need some set parameters otherwise you run into problems particularly with fairly unsophisticated combustion systems. Some engineers tackled the problem with larger grates, which is all well and good if you are building new engines.

    On a preserved locomotive the evaporation required in day to day service is quite modest. Unless, of course, you are wanting to work on the national network. Then if you fail to boil enough water fast enough you can cause a great deal of trouble. Of the delaying kind.

    Preservation does use a fair amount of fuel. Maybe the strength of a centralised purchasing body is called for.
     
  11. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    注册日期:
    2005-09-11
    帖子:
    36,449
    支持:
    9,909
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    所在地:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The subject quality of coal supplied now is more relavent than the subject of the quality supplied in the days of steam, so that is why my point is concerning that, but I would like to know on what you are basing your statement
    "The failure of fuel suppliers to deliver a consistent quality of product was one of the factors behind the decision to eliminate steam."
     
  12. henrywinskill

    henrywinskill Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2005-11-03
    帖子:
    2,345
    支持:
    3,660
    职业:
    Transgender toilet attendant
    所在地:
    North East
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  13. Swiss Toni

    Swiss Toni Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2008-11-09
    帖子:
    1,961
    支持:
    3,664
    所在地:
    Switzshire
    Better late than never, I took two shots of this and couldn't make up my mind which to keep.

    "The Great Marquess" on Yarm viaduct on it's way back to York.......LINK
     
    已获得Shep WoolleyWaterbuckMarkinDurham的支持.
  14. henrywinskill

    henrywinskill Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2005-11-03
    帖子:
    2,345
    支持:
    3,660
    职业:
    Transgender toilet attendant
    所在地:
    North East
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Nice shot, especially considering the company you were in.lol
     
  15. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    注册日期:
    2005-09-11
    帖子:
    36,449
    支持:
    9,909
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    所在地:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Not those sheep again......
     
  16. henrywinskill

    henrywinskill Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2005-11-03
    帖子:
    2,345
    支持:
    3,660
    职业:
    Transgender toilet attendant
    所在地:
    North East
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Like it Ralph
    H
     
  17. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2008-03-08
    帖子:
    27,800
    支持:
    64,483
    所在地:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    So I presume all the various documentation I've read showing that the LBSCR and LSWR (at least) analysed different types of coal for calorific value, chemical content, ash residue and other chemical parameters, and made purchasing decisions at least partly on the basis of their findings, must be an illusion then? Or maybe it was just a "south of the Thames" thing …

    Tom
     
  18. Bean-counter

    Bean-counter Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2007-07-21
    帖子:
    5,844
    支持:
    7,688
    性别:
    所在地:
    Former NP Member
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer


    Just watched this - very nice! Considered a couple of those locations myself if I ever get chance!

    11 on plus 2 locos I notice - how did the reversal go at Battersby, as I understood there was a limit of 9 for reversal there, going back many years?

    Steven
     
  19. RalphW

    RalphW Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Administrator Friend

    注册日期:
    2005-09-11
    帖子:
    36,449
    支持:
    9,909
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired-ish, Part time rail tour steward.
    所在地:
    Northwich
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Well it could have been a load of bullocks.....:rolleyes:
     
  20. Swiss Toni

    Swiss Toni Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2008-11-09
    帖子:
    1,961
    支持:
    3,664
    所在地:
    Switzshire
    The coffee in Castleton made up for it! [​IMG]
     

分享此页面