If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Rebuilt Patriot and Rebuilt Scot

本贴由 andrewshimmin2014-11-01 发布. 版块名称: Steam Traction

  1. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2011-03-18
    帖子:
    1,770
    支持:
    2,170
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Sorry if this has been answered before, I did search but couldn't find a previous thread.

    Am I right in thinking that after rebuilding with the 2A to type boiler, the LMS Royal Scot and Patriot were essentially identical?

    My reasoning is that the Patriot was a Scot chassis with a Large Claughton boiler. Hence if the boiler was replaced with the same boiler as the one used to replace the Scot boiler they should end up the same...

    I do know that these rebuilds were very extensive and it is debatable how much of the Fowler locos were left...
     
  2. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    Does that also extend to the two rebuilt Jubilees 45735/6...
    I too have wondered the differences between a Rebuilt Jubilee, Rebuilt Scot and Rebuilt Patriot ?
     
  3. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-09-01
    帖子:
    3,072
    支持:
    5,361
    性别:
    职业:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    所在地:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    There were a few constructional details which differed, notably in the Scots having thicker frames than the Baby Scots or Jubilees, as before rebuilding. This meant that these could accept lower stresses, so their cylinders were one inch smaller in diameter than the Scots. It would be difficult to notice any difference in performance, though, and many drivers preferred the Rebuilt Patriots.
     
  4. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    To most extents then a Rebuilt Scot, Jubilee and Patriot were the same animal...
    Was there a reason behind why Scots were 7P.. and Jubilees 6P and Patriots 6P5F...
     
  5. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-10-07
    帖子:
    12,736
    支持:
    11,853
    职业:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    所在地:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The rebuilds were 7P, though.
     
  6. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-09-01
    帖子:
    3,072
    支持:
    5,361
    性别:
    职业:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    所在地:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes, all three were Classed as 7P in BR post 1951 days, Class 6P before this. The UNrebuilt Patriots (and Jubilees) had been 5XP but reclassed as 6P at the same time, so always one class below the Scots and rebuilds.
     
  7. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2011-03-18
    帖子:
    1,770
    支持:
    2,170
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Thanks for the responses.
     
  8. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2011-03-18
    帖子:
    1,770
    支持:
    2,170
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I always get confused about those LMS classifications especially with BR then changing them.
    For example I believe what everyone calls an 8F was actually 7F when built?
     
  9. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-04-15
    帖子:
    16,551
    支持:
    7,897
    所在地:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I really hate that word :(
     
    已获得Rumpole, 49010, Hurricane另外1人的支持.
  10. John Stewart

    John Stewart Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2011-09-22
    帖子:
    4,206
    支持:
    2,072
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    Hilton, Derby
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's quite simple. The LMS "5" classification covered rather too much of a range of ability so the upper end of the range became "5X". BR made the "5X" into "6" and promoted the original "6" and "7" to "7" and "8".
     
  11. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2005-09-20
    帖子:
    3,927
    支持:
    1,070
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    For a few months only. When built in 1935, the first 12 were initially classified as 7Fs. This was altered to 8F in November 1935. So, the vast majority of the Class were always 8Fs.
     
    已获得Hurricane的支持.
  12. GWR Man.

    GWR Man. Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2014-10-08
    帖子:
    2,259
    支持:
    2,695
    性别:
    所在地:
    Taunton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    They should be called "As built"
     
  13. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-09-01
    帖子:
    3,072
    支持:
    5,361
    性别:
    职业:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    所在地:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    True. Reclassing was far from unknown. The Horwich Crabs started as 4F, 5P4F in 1928, 5P5F in 1940. In 1955, BR reclassed them as 6P5F - this was for accountancy purposes only - and later again 5MT.
     
  14. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-09-01
    帖子:
    3,072
    支持:
    5,361
    性别:
    职业:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    所在地:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sorry! Non-rebuilt? Doesn't really sound much better!
     
  15. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2008-03-08
    帖子:
    27,807
    支持:
    64,519
    所在地:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Original?

    Tom
     
    已获得Hurricane的支持.
  16. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-09-01
    帖子:
    3,072
    支持:
    5,361
    性别:
    职业:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    所在地:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Well, yes, Tom, but the Baby Scots were themselves rebuilt Claughtons, at least in theory! And of course, the Claughtons had themselves been rebuilt with bigger boilers...
     
    已获得Jamessquared的支持.
  17. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-04-15
    帖子:
    16,551
    支持:
    7,897
    所在地:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Maybe 'original', or 'as-built'? :)
     
    已获得Hurricane的支持.
  18. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2013-09-09
    帖子:
    10,677
    支持:
    18,713
    性别:
    所在地:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The cr4p version? :p <cough> GWR never had to do any major rebuilds of their classes :p (I suspect this will be disproven showing my lack of knowledge)
     
  19. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2005-09-20
    帖子:
    3,927
    支持:
    1,070
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    72XXs.
     
  20. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2013-09-09
    帖子:
    10,677
    支持:
    18,713
    性别:
    所在地:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Blast, I did know about them, and forgot. Not exactly a prestige passenger loco though...
     

分享此页面