If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Tornado

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Leander's Shovel, Oct 20, 2007.

  1. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,836
    Likes Received:
    22,272
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Thermal cycles is not hogwash. Even with correct boiler treatment thermal cycles take their toll on boilers.
     
  2. fergusmacg

    fergusmacg Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,778
    Likes Received:
    4,148
    Occupation:
    Design Engineer
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Sorry perhaps I should have said

    Put's all the hogwash about 'thermal cycles' causing "all" the problems into context me thinks. . . .

    The number of cyles will play some part although it is difficult to quantify, however the reported quilting is unlikely to be due to this cause . . . .
     
  3. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    12,732
    Likes Received:
    11,847
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    As I and others have said, thermal cycles may shorten the life of a boiler but they are not the cause of the locos problems. If they were, every steam loco in use would be suffering the same problems because short cycles have ben the norm since 1968. You need to look elsewhere for the prime problems and IMHO, it is a fundamental of the design.
    The vast majority of those contributing to this thread are not knocking Tornado or the A1 team. They are having a worthwhile discussion.
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,836
    Likes Received:
    22,272
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    IMHO not every steam loco would be suffering the same problems because not every loco has a steel box for one thing. 21C123, 34059 and 34081 have had firebox problems in preservation, are you suggesting these were fundamental of the design?
     
  5. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    12,732
    Likes Received:
    11,847
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Not in the least. Far from it. Did they have similar problems within the first few steamings?
     
  6. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,340
    Likes Received:
    2,506
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Location:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  7. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,340
    Likes Received:
    2,506
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Location:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  8. fergusmacg

    fergusmacg Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,778
    Likes Received:
    4,148
    Occupation:
    Design Engineer
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Thanks for this link I'd not had a look at this one before - most of what’s on this is mirrored on here although we appear to have a more technical debate on the other side of the pond???

    I also had a look on there on the thread on the premature failure of tubes on 844 which makes interesting reading and in particular the amount of localised corrosion on the tubes due to differing material specifications - see

    http://www.rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=29554&start=30

    Now I know that the above does not relate to Tornado but it did get me thinking - now that the bulging side sheets are likely to be removed, has there been significant corrosion & is a metallurgist looking at them?
     
  9. martin butler

    martin butler Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,440
    Likes Received:
    388
    Given that 35028 and 34067 were probally the 2 most reliable engines on the main line , i wonder, did the A1 trust take advice on best operating regime for Tornado? Water treatment for any steel fireboxed loco is very important, from what ive seen, the system now used at MHR, KESR and others seems to do the trick, Recently Terrier No3 which has a steel box,i believe? was examined and found to be almost like new, after 5 years use , so prehaps using ro treated water might be one possible way to prevent future boiler issues as corrosion does not happen to the same degree
     
  10. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,615
    Likes Received:
    9,418
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Any other covenators had their Tornado Telegraph yet? Still waiting on mine. :)

    No rush mind, just like reading through it when it arrives.
     
  11. Sheff

    Sheff Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,059
    Likes Received:
    3,138
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Engineer & Heritage Volunteer
    Location:
    N Warks
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Had mine by email a few days ago.
     
  12. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,615
    Likes Received:
    9,418
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Ah! That may explain it. I will have to check which address I have down for the A1 trust. Thanks Sheff!
     
  13. GWR

    GWR Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Inventory Planner
    Location:
    Woodley Nr Reading
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  14. williamfj2

    williamfj2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    637
    Likes Received:
    56
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    50A
  15. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,340
    Likes Received:
    2,506
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Location:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    So just what has been done to the boiler to resolve the stay and foundation ring problems?
     
  16. Steve from GWR

    Steve from GWR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    14
    We'll probably never know the exact details, but I would be inclined to surmise a lot. So just what exactly caused you to ask the question that way???
     
  17. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,615
    Likes Received:
    9,418
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    From the Trust's website.
     
  18. fergusmacg

    fergusmacg Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,778
    Likes Received:
    4,148
    Occupation:
    Design Engineer
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Yep the record has stuck
     
  19. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,615
    Likes Received:
    9,418
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Care to elaborate, chap? I was merely repeating the information freely available on the trust's own website, and available to everyone who wants to know for themselves. :) Forgive me for doing the logical thing by pointing it out.
     
  20. I. Cooper

    I. Cooper Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    593
    Likes Received:
    751
    Location:
    Salop
    Indeed it is the logical thing to do, but I rather suspect there are many people who just don't happen to believe the Trust's excuse/reasoning/tale that it's perfectly normal to be renewing thousands of stays, welding in great chunks of new firebox and serious foundation ring repairs after around 300 steaming cycles.

    As has already been mentioned on the thread, there are plenty of other engines whose boilers manage to last many more thermal cycles without needing such major work.

    There is also the post made by Keith6233 on 25th March quoting Mark Allatt as saying that the stays will be tubular rather than drilled bar to reduce the occurance of hot spots and to prevent cracking. That sounds very much like a design change to me. Not a problem in itself, but surely it suggests the problems have been down to a little more than just the amount of use/cycles it's seen?? ...which is/was the Trust's official tale.

    There are none so blind as those who will not see, but ultimately so long as they're happy - what does it really matter?
     

Share This Page