If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

92212

Discuție în 'Steam Traction' creată de 05micfis, 16 Mai 2009.

Pagina 5 din 5
  1. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Înscris:
    1 Sep 2006
    Mesaje:
    3.083
    Aprecieri primite:
    5.393
    Sex:
    Masculin
    Ocupație:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Locație:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Perhaps we should open a new thread here; I've never heard of a D numbered in the 92XXX series!
     
    LMS2968, 8 Iun 2009
    #81
  2. Impala

    Impala Member

    Înscris:
    20 Apr 2006
    Mesaje:
    639
    Aprecieri primite:
    0
    Ocupație:
    Project Manager
    Locație:
    Nuneaton
    Well, it was kind of relavent because they both have a flangeless driving axle.

    This reminds me that 92220 was under attack for a long time simply for having a flangeless axle. But John Peck successfully argued several times that because many civil engineers cranes also had a flangeless axle, disqualifying a 9F 2-10-0 for the same reason could not be justified. There was another issue raised about raised check rails. But again they fell out of favour, and such a thing is hard to find in the UK these days.
     
    Impala, 9 Iun 2009
    #82
  3. brit70000

    brit70000 Member

    Înscris:
    7 Iul 2007
    Mesaje:
    276
    Aprecieri primite:
    33

    Getting back to the subject loco: It's boiler passed it's steam test today. =D> =D> =D>
     
    brit70000, 11 Iun 2009
    #83
Pagina 5 din 5

Distribuie pagina asta