If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

92212

Discussie in 'Steam Traction' gestart door 05micfis, 16 mei 2009.

Pagina 5 van 5
  1. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Lid geworden:
    1 sep 2006
    Berichten:
    3.083
    Leuk Bevonden:
    5.393
    Geslacht:
    Man
    Beroep:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Locatie:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Perhaps we should open a new thread here; I've never heard of a D numbered in the 92XXX series!
     
    LMS2968, 8 jun 2009
    #81
  2. Impala

    Impala Member

    Lid geworden:
    20 apr 2006
    Berichten:
    639
    Leuk Bevonden:
    0
    Beroep:
    Project Manager
    Locatie:
    Nuneaton
    Well, it was kind of relavent because they both have a flangeless driving axle.

    This reminds me that 92220 was under attack for a long time simply for having a flangeless axle. But John Peck successfully argued several times that because many civil engineers cranes also had a flangeless axle, disqualifying a 9F 2-10-0 for the same reason could not be justified. There was another issue raised about raised check rails. But again they fell out of favour, and such a thing is hard to find in the UK these days.
     
    Impala, 9 jun 2009
    #82
  3. brit70000

    brit70000 Member

    Lid geworden:
    7 jul 2007
    Berichten:
    276
    Leuk Bevonden:
    33

    Getting back to the subject loco: It's boiler passed it's steam test today. =D> =D> =D>
     
    brit70000, 11 jun 2009
    #83
Pagina 5 van 5

Deel Deze Pagina