B12-D16-B2-K1-K5-O1
I would much prefer to see something that will be properly useful rather than just an underpowered curiosity . 2500 and 2700 would both fit that...
No
it was never a GWR loco . BR(W) yes
the 1st pic is Old Oak Common
no---- it was always 18000
I don't think you really have the gist of the Stanier/Cox report . they did not advocate no more 3 cyl locos . yes - build 2 cyls when they would...
good luck with that !
4073 certainly had a full general before leaving Swindon . I believe somebody received a rollicking because it was not authorised , so I do not...
nowt to do with 2999 , but the cab on 4003 is wrong - roof/cutaway/depth .no purity of line ... all of which makes me wonder if she is on a Castle...
by contrast 4003 looks like summat found in a pyramid[ATTACH]
its a model . but - tall chimney tall bonnet brass boiler bands [ATTACH]
no - unrebuilt
I know --- but it seems a shame to wake her up--and she is in that rubbish post war green . I want one in 1910 condition finished properly with...
I have been off line for a few days so have not been able to participate so a few comments on what has been said . I am aware of contradictions...
me too . the GWR were fond of cobbling different engine parts together so I really cant see the problem with reverse engineering. we really could...
of course he did -----------may have been a bit dry for some tastes tho'
put simply , I do not believe it was said in a formal situation , nor do I believe it was meant to be taken seriously . I think it may have been...
I totally agree - but in this instance I believe him .
用逗号分隔用户名
