If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Green Arrow

本贴由 ssk24002014-08-18 发布. 版块名称: Steam Traction

  1. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-03-24
    帖子:
    8,383
    支持:
    5,368
    性别:
    职业:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    所在地:
    Southport
    Precisely ! The expense of repairing / replacing the block is the usual reason given for the repair not being authorised.
     
  2. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2009-04-16
    帖子:
    8,912
    支持:
    5,848
    That makes very good sense. I would even go further and say that, if the original block is really significant, then leaving it on the loco where nobody can see it is perverse. Take it off and display it, warts and all. Pending the availability of finance for making and fitting a replacement, a wooden dummy of the bits that can be seen (mostly only cladding anyway) would serve quite adequately (like Mallard's wooden valances when she was in Clapham).
     
  3. Anthony Coulls

    Anthony Coulls Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2008-04-24
    帖子:
    1,803
    支持:
    622
    When the V2 was preserved, locos were selected because they were the first/oldest/most original survivor of their class. Green Arrow was available so was selected. The single casting cylinders were significant but not the be all and end all. We don't know that they aren't repairable - there would need to be a survey with the loco dismantled, but it's not the Arrow's time at present.
     
    已获得The Green Howards, S.A.C. Martin, 2392另外5人的支持.
  4. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-03-24
    帖子:
    8,383
    支持:
    5,368
    性别:
    职业:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    所在地:
    Southport
    Thank you for your report Anthony; as one of many who want 4771 / 60800 back on the main line I had always been led to believe that the NRM's insistence on replacing the cylinders was the main reason that a fast turnaround wasn't possible. You have given us hope for a main line return - thank you.
     
    已获得Ralph的支持.
  5. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2009-04-16
    帖子:
    8,912
    支持:
    5,848
    I add my thanks as well, for a more welcome attitude from the NRM than the earlier one quoted by Fred in post #14.

    We should in fact be extremely grateful that the NRM allows any of its locos to be brought back into working order and used to pull trains. We certainly shouldn't complain about which ones they choose and when. We can of course express wishes: "Wouldn't it be wonderful for so-and-so to be running again".
     
    已获得Ralphjnc的支持.
  6. Maunsell man

    Maunsell man Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2006-05-01
    帖子:
    1,601
    支持:
    512
    职业:
    Senior Finance Auditor
    所在地:
    Kent
    Time for something else to have a go. Everytime an engine goes out of ticket there is always a demand for it to be turned around immediately. Truro and Arrow have both had two stints in steam. How about something else like the Midland Compound or the SECR D class? Saying that Rocket hasn't had an outing for a while.

    Anthony - can I have a word please? I have set up the mainline the Rocket Facebook page and got a quote for airbrakes and all the electronic gubbings...
     
    已获得stuarttrainsAnthony Coullssteamvideosnet的支持.
  7. Anthony Coulls

    Anthony Coulls Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2008-04-24
    帖子:
    1,803
    支持:
    622
    Given other things that are gently kicking off at present, I must stress - it is not the right time to even think about the V2. Please don't write, ask, berate us or otherwise, saying "Anthony said on NatPres". I have been taken out of context recently and it has caused problems. Do think before you type or even semi quote me in a mess room, it WILL have repercussions...
     
    已获得Ralphjnc的支持.
  8. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-03-24
    帖子:
    8,383
    支持:
    5,368
    性别:
    职业:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    所在地:
    Southport
    My apologies to you Anthony if my response(s) have caused you problems through misinterpretation; I accept that the V2 must take its place in the queue as the NRM has limited resources and am quite happy that other locomotives be given their chance to be at work on the main line. In the same context however I presume you are aware that 4771 Green Arrow has a massive following - possibly greater than that for Flying Scotsman - and that even the slightest whisper of a possible return to the main line raises expectations beyond NRM resources.

    Whether this is a by-product of old age or a simple appreciation of a unique locomotive design I leave others to judge; please know however that your contributions are highly valued and greatly appreciated by many whether on the V2; the Duchess or even the much-awaited Stanier 3-cylinder 2500.
     
  9. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2011-03-18
    帖子:
    1,770
    支持:
    2,170
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    There is no way Green Arrow has a greater following than Scotsman!
    Hyperbole is all very well, and the V2 is very nice, but just no!
     
    已获得MikeParkin65, Ralph, jnc另外7人的支持.
  10. Allegheny

    Allegheny Member

    注册日期:
    2015-05-08
    帖子:
    637
    支持:
    311
    性别:
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Does a specific fund exist that people could contribute to, for the repair of Green Arrow?
     
  11. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    注册日期:
    2007-07-17
    帖子:
    4,906
    支持:
    7,651
    Sorry to disappoint but the answer is no. I suspect that now is not the time to expect this to change. But the loco is well preserved and who knows what may happen in the future.

    Peter James
     
  12. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-09-27
    帖子:
    5,294
    支持:
    3,599
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Well I just hope it doesn't end up in the outstation at Leicester. Can't see there being any way back for it if it does. That would be a tragedy.
     
  13. class8mikado

    class8mikado Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2009-06-01
    帖子:
    3,840
    支持:
    1,644
    职业:
    Print Estimator/ Repository of Useless Informatio.
    所在地:
    Bingley W.Yorks.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Condemned to Leicester for all eternity..... perhaps they should rename it Richard III.
    Watch with Interest how the Monoblock casting has been tackled by the P2 project ( a composite of castings and fabrication). Its unlikely that this approach is more costly that a full casting and maybe it would allow the original appearance ( no outside steam pipes) to be retained - if that's seen as important.
    Alternatively perhaps it would be important, for performance reasons for the Loco to be given a double kylchap, and then for safety reasons to have smoke deflectors ...:Blackalien:
     
  14. iancawthorne

    iancawthorne Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2010-08-23
    帖子:
    1,789
    支持:
    6,133
    性别:
    所在地:
    Brampton, Cumbria
    Please, just no!
     
  15. Sawdust

    Sawdust Member

    注册日期:
    2015-07-18
    帖子:
    508
    支持:
    884
    性别:
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Some things are worse than an eternity in Leicester!

    Sawdust.
     
    已获得S.A.C. Martin, Spamcan81, 2392另外1人的支持.
  16. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2005-09-20
    帖子:
    3,927
    支持:
    1,070
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    What is wrong with Leicester? It is V2 territory. Even Scotsman would not be out of place there. It spent many years on the GC between Marylebone and Sheffield/ Manchester.
     
    已获得Christopher125, Hirn, S.A.C. Martin另外2人的支持.
  17. greenslade

    greenslade Member

    注册日期:
    2009-08-24
    帖子:
    261
    支持:
    217
    not a lookalike but a different engine alltogether wheel arrangement not being the least of the differences
     
  18. class8mikado

    class8mikado Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2009-06-01
    帖子:
    3,840
    支持:
    1,644
    职业:
    Print Estimator/ Repository of Useless Informatio.
    所在地:
    Bingley W.Yorks.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    So at 50mph + on a station platform or on a footbridge... back in the day when both had polished smokebox hinge straps, apple green... and its not a look alike ? should have gone to specsavers....
     
  19. acorb

    acorb Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2007-07-17
    帖子:
    2,950
    支持:
    4,380
    所在地:
    Powys
    And the Gcr does have a track record of restoring nrm locomotives, I would suggest it had a better chance of returning to steam there than at York.
     
  20. MarkinDurham

    MarkinDurham Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2007-05-04
    帖子:
    2,229
    支持:
    999
    所在地:
    Durham
    *wanders off and complies list...*
     

分享此页面