If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Network rail been given ok to chop part of Liverpool rd line Manchester

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by charterplan, May 18, 2014.

  1. Christopher125

    Christopher125 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    558
    Location:
    Isle of Wight
    I'm sure that it wouldn't given the width needing to be bridged and the limited usefulness of the connection especially if it could only be used during a night time possession.
     
    TonyMay likes this.
  2. John Stewart

    John Stewart Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,206
    Likes Received:
    2,072
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Hilton, Derby
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The width to be bridged would be some 9m, plus say 3m to the pivot point, plus perhaps 3m for a weighted rear section of bridge. Actual structural span would be around 12m with the rails carried on the deck attached to the bottom of side girders. It could be signalled like any "flat" crossing.
     
  3. Christopher125

    Christopher125 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    558
    Location:
    Isle of Wight
    Even if that was practical on top of a viaduct, which seems unlikely, the cost of designing installing and maintaining it doesn't make any sense for the amount of use the connection has seen historically.
     
    TonyMay likes this.
  4. John Stewart

    John Stewart Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,206
    Likes Received:
    2,072
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Hilton, Derby
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Retaining the historic environment often costs more money than would be justified as value for money in a non-heritage situation.
     
    deaftech likes this.
  5. Christopher125

    Christopher125 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    558
    Location:
    Isle of Wight
    Putting a swing bridge on top of the viaduct has nothing to do with history or heritage, it's just an insanely expensive way to maintain a mainline connection of almost no practical value to the museum.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2016
    TonyMay likes this.
  6. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,634
    Likes Received:
    8,302
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It may sound harsh but I suspect many enthusiasts did not appreciate the existence or value of the line at MOSI . We are of course spoilt for choice . Compare the media coverage of two recent preservation events to understand where the heritage heart lies
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2016
    deaftech likes this.
  7. DJH

    DJH Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    666
    Likes Received:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Graduate Engineer
    Location:
    London
    The reality is it was cheaper to pay off those impacted rather than the alternation Option 15 which would of been £17 million more. I suspect in time Network Rail may regret not going with the other option but I suspect they were under pressure over the cost. The regret may come not merely because of the damage to a historical site but the fact operationally the alternative would be able to stable longer trains waiting for a path to Deansgate and would give more operational options at Victoria. £17m difference in construction terms on infrastructure is actually not a lot. My only hope is that what is currently being proposed with what remains is developed into something that really does explain the site to those visiting and mitigate the amount of damage caused.

    The one thing that has caused a lot of anger is the museum chose to not publicise the last day it was running including within the museum on the day itself. It is only because a number of volunteers, friends and supporters started getting the word out that anyone was aware of it at all.

    As far as the site now Network Rail are likely to have started dismantling the museums track already but you may have time this weekend to catch the track in it's current form from the end of the station building before it has been lifted. I cannot however verify that this hasn't already started to take place.

    Duncan
     
  8. meeee

    meeee Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    1,319
    It seems that the discussion on this site seems to have focused on the mainline connection which is of little value to the museum or railway preservation in general. Really it is the partial destruction of a site that dates from very birth of intercity passenger railways, and the loss of a substantial part of the running line that we should be worried about. The former will be destroyed forever. But perhaps something can be done about the latter.

    Could the museum not consider setting up the Y formation the other way round. You would buy your ticket and board at the original departure station, the train then sets off towards the power hall before reversing down a new route across the car park to join up with the line that is being cut off. They could even use some of that bung they got from Network Rail for dropping opposition to pay for it.
     
    black5 likes this.
  9. DJH

    DJH Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    666
    Likes Received:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Graduate Engineer
    Location:
    London
    I've looked a bit more at the alternatives and can understand the reasons why the alternation option 15 wasn't persued. It was viable but did have some significant drawbacks. The important thing now is to ensure that

    a) The impact to the site is minimised and the story can still be told of how all the structures link together as a whole ie it would be good if track could extend across water street to a set of buffer stops so a picture of a Planet on water street is still possible and visitors can see track on Stephensons bridge showing how the line went on to the mainline (even if it is not actually connected.) It may in fact on a later thought be possible to technically connect to the mainline. A bolted connection of two rails (one of the mainline and one from the museum) and cast in rails underneath the mass concrete of the chord where it crosses the museum site.
    b) retaining an operational railway on the museum site to show in motion engines running there.

    Duncan
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2016
  10. John Stewart

    John Stewart Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,206
    Likes Received:
    2,072
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Hilton, Derby
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I don't believe that the famous "Option 15" was dismissed because of extra cost. It was dismissed because it came too late in the day (the number is a clue) and it upset Salford's well-developed plans for the land north of the railway. To have moved to it would have put the entire scheme back by possibly a couple of years (the delay has I think been exaggerated in some quarters) and this would have put a block on the entire Northern Hub which the government is so keen on. The retention of the link got little support from the railway enthusiast sector because it is a branch of railway heritage that is more the concern of social and economic historians than those who see railway heritage only in terms of big hot moving things.
     
  11. domeyhead

    domeyhead Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    161
    I've just read the thread through from the beginning and this post encapsulates my opinion perfectly.
     
  12. GWR Man.

    GWR Man. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,197
    Likes Received:
    2,413
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Taunton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The thing we should be glad of is that the buildings were used as late as they were by BR, and not sold off, or knocked down in the 60's which could have happened so easy.
     
  13. DJH

    DJH Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    666
    Likes Received:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Graduate Engineer
    Location:
    London
    Demolition works begin tomorrow. If you want to capture it a good vantage point is at the end of the site next the station masters building.

    Unless told otherwise I assume the museum don't intend to record proceedings.
     
  14. MarkinDurham

    MarkinDurham Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,198
    Likes Received:
    973
    Location:
    Durham
    It's been reported elsewhere that leave to appeal has been granted to the chap who was trying to stop the demolition. If true, surely this work has to be put on hold?
     
  15. simon

    simon Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    11,567
    Likes Received:
    5,224
    Not unless he is granted an injunction, which there is no report of him having obtained.
     
  16. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Someone managed to delay the building of the Aberdeen by-pass for about 20 years by such methods.
     
  17. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,246
    Likes Received:
    17,946
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    And I wonder how many extra deaths there were in those 20 years?

    Robin
     
  18. John Stewart

    John Stewart Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,206
    Likes Received:
    2,072
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Hilton, Derby
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    In these circumstances an injunction would only normally be given if the works underway would irretrievably alter the situation (which it won't because track can be relaid) and the claimant undertakes to compensate the person carrying out the works if he loses. I can't see Mr. Whitby doing this. In fact, it seems rather sad that what was a praiseworthy alternative idea has morphed into a pointless squabble. People need to learn when to accept that the battle has been lost and get on with life.
     
  19. DJH

    DJH Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    666
    Likes Received:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Graduate Engineer
    Location:
    London
    Piling has begun on site and based on closures around water street plus a large crane this weekend I suspect Princes Bridge wont be hanging around much longer.
     
  20. DJH

    DJH Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    666
    Likes Received:
    10
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Graduate Engineer
    Location:
    London
    Pineapple line at MoSI began to be lifted earlier today.
     

Share This Page