If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Current and Proposed New-Builds

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by aron33, Aug 15, 2017.

  1. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm not trying to undermine Riddles reputation. He and his team built an excellent range of standard locomotives that served BR well albeit had woefully short working lives which in hindsight should have been apparent to all in charge of BR and transport in this country.

    What I dispute is the original quotation that was attributed to Riddles by Hermod. The idea that Pacific locomotives in this country were not utilised well or didn't serve their railways well is patently a nonsense. For it to come from someone whose team went on to design three types of pacifics for use in this country, no less, is mind boggling.

    It is clear that the LMS and LNER utilised Pacific locomotives pre-war very well in a variety of ways, including publicity. During and post war, the Southern Region and to some extent BR did too, particularly where the Bulleid Light Pacifics and the Britannias were concerned.

    Given the fact that Riddles comments surfaced within a few years of the first Brits being built that seems incredible. I would like to read the original comment and its exact context because the disconnect between making that comment and having literally just authorised building of new Pacifics seems absurd!
     
    Bluenosejohn likes this.
  2. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes - I should have phrased that better, admittedly. Hands in the air!

    I'm not certain it is right to say they were a "match" for the A1s. That simply isn't the case and you can see this in the length of trains, the speed and routes they were employed on. The A1s (and later A10s then B1s) eliminated GCR 4-6-0s by the 1940s on the GC routes. They were adequate for the time they were built in but the Robinson 4-6-0s of varying wheel sizes and drive were just not very good at all. I dare say that if you look at the GCR's 4-6-0s and then to the GWR's smaller 2 and 4 cylinder 4-6-0s you can see the gulf between the designers.

    It has always perplexed me that Robinson was apparently first choice for the LNER CME position; that he deferred to Gresley in 1923 was one of railway history's defining moments. Best decision Robinson ever made.

    I am sure they did do the work that was asked of them; by the same token, so did Thompson's designs (and look at the criticism he receives by comparison).
     
    Bluenosejohn likes this.
  3. sir gilbert claughton

    sir gilbert claughton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    Messages:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    511
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired
    Location:
    east sussex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    but it didn't break - unlike some running at high rpm
     
  4. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    5,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Perhaps Authority managed stop it before the calamity happened!
     
    Bluenosejohn likes this.
  5. sir gilbert claughton

    sir gilbert claughton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    Messages:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    511
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired
    Location:
    east sussex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    there was a small passage of time before Authority got to hear of it. 92178 if my memory serves
     
  6. sir gilbert claughton

    sir gilbert claughton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    Messages:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    511
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired
    Location:
    east sussex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer

    I cannot comment from experience . Tuplin thought they were all rubbish = but he was not the most reliable in his views or solutions .
    Alan Blencow reckoned a B1 was better than any of them . I suspect he was right .

    whatever the truth they made great pics - see the GCR website .
    the GCR were responsible for some truly great locos Director, PomPom, and the O4.you could probably include the A5 as well

    Robinson declined the CME job solely because of his age . it is a tad unfair to criticise him . he had a wonderful career and was a very talented man. dunno if there is a biography but look him up in Graces Guide
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2017
    andrewshimmin likes this.
  7. paulhitch

    paulhitch Guest

    Yes there is. It is called "J.G. Robinson A Lifetime's Work" by David Jackson. It is clear that he was not a designer as such and there were a number of distinct "eras" depending upon whom was the current Chief Draughtsman and the degree of influence of individual manufacturers such as NBL or Beyer Peacock may have had at any given time.

    PH
     
  8. andrewshimmin

    andrewshimmin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    2,160
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    True of many CMEs good and bad that they managed the design process rather than doing their designs themselves. They were busy men!
    Robinson made some fine contributions (not least his superheater) and also built some duds. Also true of many CMEs...
    His engines were very nice to look at, which, given only 2 survive, is all that matters about the rest, now!
     
    LMS2968 likes this.
  9. sir gilbert claughton

    sir gilbert claughton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    Messages:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    511
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired
    Location:
    east sussex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    he was also GM of the OWW --Oxford Worcester & Wolverhampton ? (the Old Worse & Worse) which was in a parlous state . he turned it round very successfully
     
  10. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Your reply is much appreciated. My principal concern in all this is merely to try and establish the context in which certain historic events occured (or didn't, as the case may be). In fairness to folks discussing steam issues, may I suggest the diesel related part of this discussion be continued over on a new thread within the Diesel & Electric section, if you're agreeable?
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2017
  11. aron33

    aron33 Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2016
    Messages:
    437
    Likes Received:
    563
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    United States
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The GCR is poorly represented, only with Butler Henderson representing the railway.
    Why not choose several classic GCR designs?
    [​IMG]
    Parker N5 Class 0-6-2
    [​IMG]
    Robinson B9 Class 4-6-0
    [​IMG]
    Or a Robinson C5 Class 4-4-2
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2017
    Forestpines likes this.
  12. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,330
    Likes Received:
    11,666
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That B9 looks nice, not sure about the N5 though, if we're thinking about a (theoretical) new build tank I'd quite like a J50. Such an unusual look! Surprised a certain Mr Awdrey didn't use one as the basis for a character in his books.
     
  13. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,808
    Likes Received:
    946
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    N5 9311 was a one off with extended side tanks.
     
  14. D6332found

    D6332found Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Messages:
    361
    Likes Received:
    179
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dinting
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Lord Faringdons were given an average start to stop schedule of 54mph Leed-KX with upto 85mph. For the era, that wasnt bad. If, like the Stars, and A1s they had gradually had the flaws engineered out of them, sure the B1s were better, some 25 years on so they should be! A new build Valour would be an enormous task, with a modern front end and fire grate modification, wow! A Pom-Pom or Immingham might be better for preservation unless it would get huge support. Or de-accession Butler Henderson and make it go!
     
    aron33, andrewshimmin and Cartman like this.
  15. ghost

    ghost Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,967
    Likes Received:
    5,064
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    N.Ireland
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Well there is this: https://www.facebook.com/TheJ50Group/ but I wouldn't hold your breath - they've been going for 4.5 years, and they don't seem to have all the drawings yet, never mind getting to cutting steel.


    Keith
     
  16. LesterBrown

    LesterBrown Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    761
    Location:
    Devon
    You've lost me a bit now. Who do you mean? (I thought we were talking about J G Robinson who would have been 4 yrs old when the OW&W disappeared upon amalgamation).
     
  17. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    2 out of those three look glorious, but when folk think of the GCR, they always think of good looking locos and like @D6332found said ... there's "Butler Henderon" that could be put back in steam, so let's go with the fugly one for a change! :Bag:
     
    Cartman likes this.
  18. Cartman

    Cartman Well-Known Member Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    1,672
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Van driver
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Theres also the ROD from the GC, 63601
     
    Gav106 and 30854 like this.
  19. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    ..... and (getting a bit ahead of ourselves, I know) there's the planned GCR Class 2 (LNER D7) which seems to be making headway.
    https://www.gcr567loco.co.uk/
     
    Cartman likes this.
  20. Cartman

    Cartman Well-Known Member Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    1,672
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Van driver
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Good point. I had forgotten about that one. I think that will probably be in the second group of new builds to be completed after ones like 32424, 2999, 6880, the NER G5 and the P2 are done
     
    aron33 likes this.

Share This Page