If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Rolling Stock For Sale

本贴由 steamwife2007-12-18 发布. 版块名称: Heritage Rolling Stock

  1. Mogul

    Mogul Member

    注册日期:
    2016-02-02
    帖子:
    324
    支持:
    687
    性别:
    所在地:
    Dorset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Now that the thread has drifted sufficiently for buggy accommodation to warrant a thread all of its own (mods?). What do people think about the practice of removing the toilet cubicles from MK1s? Useful for extra buggy space but in years to come will we look back and say this was vandalism of a heritage coach?
     
    已获得lil Bearmichaelh的支持.
  2. cct man

    cct man Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2007-01-15
    帖子:
    3,220
    支持:
    49
    职业:
    CONSTRUCTION
    所在地:
    LONDON
    A lot of Railways do this already. As for buggies, all is commercial now getting as many bums on seats as possible.

    Chris
     
  3. daddsie

    daddsie Guest

    I can understand the reasoning, but disposal. Surely a back conversion to a TSO would be the sensible move?
     
    已获得lil Bear的支持.
  4. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    注册日期:
    2008-03-08
    帖子:
    27,800
    支持:
    64,478
    所在地:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    (OT -sort of). When ours were that young, we very rapidly gave up on buggies and used slings - far more convenient for getting round attractions, as you were no longer constrained to only places a buggy could go.

    I do agree with you that if you have a buggy, you do become somewhat loathe to leave it behind, even if you are essentially just going out and back.

    Tom
     
    已获得The Dainton BankerMonkey Magic的支持.
  5. mogulb

    mogulb New Member

    注册日期:
    2010-12-20
    帖子:
    133
    支持:
    95
    Apparently that was suggested Steve but no interest. A lot easier to convert back to a TSO than the original conversion to RMB. Seems especially shortsighted as the wish to increase train lengths will need more coaches, TSO’s are not exactly readily available !
     
    已获得lil BearWenlock的支持.
  6. stephenvane

    stephenvane Member

    注册日期:
    2011-09-13
    帖子:
    526
    支持:
    399
    Sell 1865 instead and convert 1885 to TSO?

    Best of both worlds. Cash in the bank from sale of 1865, and an extra TSO.

    Yes does seem short sighted.
     
    Last edited: 2018-08-16
  7. mogulb

    mogulb New Member

    注册日期:
    2010-12-20
    帖子:
    133
    支持:
    95

    Far too sensible suggestion, for anybody to even consider it.
     
    已获得daddsie的支持.
  8. SpudUk

    SpudUk Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2009-02-05
    帖子:
    1,736
    支持:
    597
    性别:
    职业:
    Project Manager
    所在地:
    Wales
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I have a two year old, went on the South Devon last week and took the buggy for the walk into Totnes. Station staff were really helpful, but it in the guards/luggage compartment of a Mk 1 and left it there, as did a huge number of other parents. We then sat three carriages away! If you provide it, it will be used, and it doesn't have to be a big deal. Didn't meet anyone who would have wanted their buggy with them, so long as it was on the train somewhere. We all have fancy things called nappy bags we can carry with us now.

    Although Tom is right, if we weren't walking into Totnes we'd have used our sling instead
     
    已获得Monkey Magic的支持.
  9. Buckeye

    Buckeye New Member

    注册日期:
    2007-08-29
    帖子:
    91
    支持:
    12
    Posting error - deleted
     
    Last edited: 2018-08-28
  10. Buckeye

    Buckeye New Member

    注册日期:
    2007-08-29
    帖子:
    91
    支持:
    12
    Did these go into preservation? Nothing showing on VCT or UKPRSL sites. Just curious that's all.
     
  11. nick813

    nick813 Well-Known Member Loco Owner

    注册日期:
    2010-01-28
    帖子:
    1,524
    支持:
    1,611
    性别:
    所在地:
    poole dorset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  12. 3155

    3155 New Member

    注册日期:
    2008-11-23
    帖子:
    197
    支持:
    29
    性别:
    职业:
    loco owner
    所在地:
    aintree
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    There are 2 16 ton mineral wagons for sale at Ribble Steam Railway Preston, B561981 &B564811, both ex Florence mine.
    Contact me for more info.

    3155
     
  13. Buckeye

    Buckeye New Member

    注册日期:
    2007-08-29
    帖子:
    91
    支持:
    12
    This is on The Carriage Exchange - might be worth giving them a ring.

    WANTED - 16T MINERAL WAGON
    Wanted, One 16 ton mineral wagon. please contact 07936- 720213.
     
  14. John Baritone

    John Baritone New Member

    注册日期:
    2018-02-22
    帖子:
    140
    支持:
    134
    性别:
    所在地:
    Buxton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    A point worth considering is how the coach is built. Basically, is it a frame which is pretty much self-supporting, with fairly light cladding to keep it wind and waterproof (like a Land Rover)? Or is it a monocoque structure, where the bodywork is, at the least, essential to the strength and stiffness of the vehicle (like a modern car)?

    Your post rung a bell, and I looked back at the RAIB report on the South Devon incident where a door which was supposed to be sealed up was opened, and a child nearly fell through the floor of a toilet compartment (RAIB Report 02, 2018 - link below). The relevant part is in section 37, and reads as follows:
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    37 The RAIB’s examination of the toilet cubicle and the damage to the door and the frame, after the accident and the subsequent repairs, found that the screws were inserted through the door frame and door at an angle (figures 16 to 19). Although the physical evidence is not conclusive, the RAIB considers that the screws could have become ineffective as a result of one or a combination of the following factors:

    a. The door was accidentally or intentionally forced open . . .

    b. The removal of the toilet floor and the decay at the base of the partitions resulted in a loss of integrity of the structure of the toilet cubicle, because the floor was no longer tying the partition walls together. This meant the structure was no longer rigid, and the movement of the train may have resulted in the door frame and the door moving relative to each other. This movement caused the screws securing the door to become loose, fracture or fall out.

    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    (my emphasis, JB)

    I note that the RAIB report only suggests this as a possibility, but it does make sense. Some years back, a friend decided to go in for rallying, using an Austin-Healey Sprite. As built, the Sprite was built up from various pressed steel sheets, spot-welded together, but in many cases the panels had quite extensive cut-outs for various purposes. The friend managed to eliminate virtually all of the holes by MIG-welding thin pieces of sheet steel over them - with a quite remarkable increase in the body stiffness. You can see the effect with one of those rectangular tobacco tins; first, try twisting it with the lid off - then push the lid on firmly and try the same again. The increase in stiffness, even though the lid is only a push-fit, is very marked.

    It might be the case that a partition forming the wall of a toilet compartment contributes very little to the overall strength of a coach, or that it can be replaced by other strengthening components - in which case the only considerations would be functional / historical; but in view of that suggestion made by the RAIB (who definitely know their onions) I think it would be well worth checking it from a purely engineering perspective before removing any sizeable part of a coach or wagon.

    Link to the RAIB report:
    https://www.gov.uk/raib-reports/rep...gh-a-missing-toilet-floor-south-devon-railway
     
    已获得sem34090的支持.
  15. Calsyman

    Calsyman New Member

    注册日期:
    2018-09-10
    帖子:
    86
    支持:
    167
    性别:
    所在地:
    Wellingborough
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  16. cav1975

    cav1975 Member

    注册日期:
    2009-09-24
    帖子:
    526
    支持:
    649
    已获得Glenmutchkin的支持.
  17. pmh_74

    pmh_74 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2009-01-28
    帖子:
    2,423
    支持:
    1,707
    Not convinced the 'container' has ever been anywhere near a railway myself. The roof profile is all wrong.
     
  18. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-10-07
    帖子:
    12,732
    支持:
    11,848
    职业:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    所在地:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I suspect that it is but has been very much modified over time and that doesn't include the rather large hole in the side. The roof and doors have certainly been modified. The lifting hangers and gusset plate shout railway container to me.
     
  19. Ploughman

    Ploughman Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2008-04-01
    帖子:
    5,969
    支持:
    2,761
    职业:
    Ex a lot of things.
    所在地:
    Near where the 3 Ridings meet
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  20. Calsyman

    Calsyman New Member

    注册日期:
    2018-09-10
    帖子:
    86
    支持:
    167
    性别:
    所在地:
    Wellingborough
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer

分享此页面