If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It may be worth checking your inboxes again, I have just this minute had another email apologising for the error in the first, and all now seems above board.

    Very much cock-up rather than conspiracy on this occasion.
     
    D1002 and Greenway like this.
  2. D1002

    D1002 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    8,658
    Likes Received:
    6,415
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Enfield
    Hehe. Yep. Just got the apologetic email. I am a fully paid up member of the WSSRT:).
     
  3. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Ditto
     
    Paul42 and D1002 like this.
  4. Breva

    Breva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    2,158
    Likes Received:
    3,790
    Location:
    Gloucestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes, I had the same email.
    The confirmation was undated, I still don't have a membership number, and should I not have received the papers for the AGM. How can we vote?
     
    Paul42 and D1002 like this.
  5. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I don't think we're expecting the papers for the new AGM have been sent out yet, just the date that has been announced. Could be wrong. I agree no number is odd, but they have all other details to corroborate our membership which we have to fill in on voting forms.

    Edit - just checked the website, all is explained in the news item from the 28th December:

    "The Annual General Meeting of the West Somerset Steam Railway Trust will be held on Saturday 14 November at 14.00 by Zoom.

    Details will be sent to members 21 days before the meeting."

    I make that the 24th October, so we can stand down for now... I did say the chances of it remaining quiet until AGM day were slim to none!
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2020
    Fixit likes this.
  6. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Question for @Lineisclear

    Ignoring Coronavirus for a moment, what I think is fairly clear is that

    1. The WSRA & WSSRT between them own sufficient PLC shares to exert a significant influence on, if not de facto control of the PLC, however to date have elected not to do so, and
    2. It is clear that nowhere near enough money had been spent by the PLC on the infrastructure resulting in the line being allowed to deteriorate, and
    3. The eviction of the S&DRT, in particular the description of the organisation as a 'Cuckoo in the Nest' and subsequent allegations made against it which were proven to be untrue have cast doubts in the mind of many as to the judgement of the PLC board & by implication, given that neither the WSRA or WSSRT protested against the behaviour of the PLC, the judgement of those in control of those organisations.
    4. In addition questions must be asked as to why the WSRA & WSSRT did not use their shareholdings to influence the PLC despite being aware of the deteriorating state of the railway.

    It seems to me that the proposed new structure leaves the same people in charge while at the same time not providing proper control of the organisation by members of the supporting charity, many of whom are the most important people in this organisation, the volunteers.

    It may of course be possible to compromise, and I suggest that such a compromise would involve bringing some 'Rank and File' for want of a better term into the management of the WSR family and some of those currently controlling the WSR, in particular on the PLC board to resign.
     
  7. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,246
    Likes Received:
    17,946
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I've never been much of a fan in providing free legal advice in public, and as one of the participants, it is doubly inappropriate.

    Robin
     
    Triumph 2500S, Paul42 and MellishR like this.
  8. WSSRTcandidates

    WSSRTcandidates New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    484
    Location:
    All over the country
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Just to say that we all had the confusing message from the WSSRT earlier today, with two attachments - both the same - both saying that membership was pending, even though in the e-mail itself it referred to a second letter saying that membership was confirmed. This, despite the fact that we had all previously had our memberships confirmed. We then had the follow-up e-mail at 20:28 saying that our memberships had in fact been confirmed. It looks as though the WSSRT could do with some help in their general levels of administrative competence. Maybe some new Trustees could help in that respect?
     
  9. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    At least they remembered to Bcc this time rather than reveal other members' email addresses to each other!
     
    SebWelsh and WSSRTcandidates like this.
  10. D1002

    D1002 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    8,658
    Likes Received:
    6,415
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Enfield
    Don’t worry about it Robin. Been sorted now. Cock up rather than conspiracy.
     
    Robin Moira White likes this.
  11. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,498
    Likes Received:
    5,455
    So as I hoped earlier, administrative by the sounds of it.

    Must admit I did chuckle that a part of the WSR cannot complete a few membership applications without some drama...
     
    Will Foster and Greenway like this.
  12. Bayard

    Bayard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    3,871
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Well, I've just received my emails confirming my membership and saying it will be reviewed (Dear Mr Schroedinger .....) and asking if I would like to volunteer. Perhaps I should volunteer to help them with their email communications.
     
    MellishR likes this.
  13. The Dainton Banker

    The Dainton Banker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2014
    Messages:
    1,720
    Likes Received:
    3,186
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Over the hills and far away
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's called "Democracy" and, despite all its weaknesses, it is the best system we've got. Whether you're talking national politics or a small local society it's up to the various contenders to make their points to convince people to vote for them. If they fail to engage with the voters / members and to address issues that have been raised, they cannot rely on their past record to see them re-elected.
    In this particular case it seems the WSSRT constitution oddly failed to limit the number of trustees that could be elected and that cannot be altered without going through the legal procedure of amending the rules, which takes a favourable membership vote at an AGM or EGM and time to implement. Therefore the current Trustees are obliged, under their constitution, to hold an electi0n of all 16(?) candidates and accept the results as dictated by the membership. As there is no limit on the number that can be elected, the election cannot be a "vote for up to 'x' number of candidates" style but could be a "Vote yes or no to each candidate" which might help to reduce the number of "winners".
    I do have some real concern that there appear to be some attempts to interfere with the constitutional process. However good the reasons may seem this can never be acceptable.
     
    MellishR likes this.
  14. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,185
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer

    If there is no limit to the number of trustees, how can you hold an election?
     
  15. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    A simple for/against motion against each candidate. As long as every candidate gets more fors than againsts then everyone gets in, but you can still reject candidates. It is a better system as it means you can reject as many candidates as you like if you think their unsuitable and not have to settle for the least worst, but normally there is an upper limit to the number of trustees/directors to cater for that aspect of things. Most odd that the WSSRT doesn't have this. I expect they're regretting it now!
     
  16. staffordian

    staffordian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    2,134
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The Potteries
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As others have mentioned, by using a Yes or No vote for each candidate. More yesses than noes and you're in, vice versa and you're not.

    Edit. I see I was beaten to it, but after replying, the thought struck me.

    In theory, all candidates might be rejected. What happens then?
     
    The Dainton Banker likes this.
  17. The Dainton Banker

    The Dainton Banker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2014
    Messages:
    1,720
    Likes Received:
    3,186
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Over the hills and far away
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As I suggested: on a "yes or no" basis, i.e.votes for and against. It's an acceptable process, in fact the WSRA used it for their recent AGM. Only candidates with more votes "for" than "against" are considered elected.
     
  18. The Dainton Banker

    The Dainton Banker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2014
    Messages:
    1,720
    Likes Received:
    3,186
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Over the hills and far away
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Not quite, FS. If they are all voted "for" then they are all elected. Nobody can then decide not to accept some of them "if you think their unsuitable and not have to settle for the least worst,".
    Just think: It would be overruling the voters. Who would make that decision and with what authority ?
     
  19. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,100
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    History suggests they’d be another argument ...

    Tom
     
    Greenway and ross like this.
  20. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,440
    Likes Received:
    17,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sorry, I meant in comparison to for example a ranking system where, say, you had 10 candidates for 5 positions, the top 5 would always get in, you'd have no way of expressing your dislike for all 10.
     

Share This Page