If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. Downline

    Downline New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2020
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    288
    Location:
    Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Its not really strange, alot of things change in 150 years
     
  2. Bayard

    Bayard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    3,871
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's difficult to see how it was less cramped, even 150 years ago, unless the goods shed dates from the extension of the line to Minehead.
     
  3. bishdunster

    bishdunster New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    103
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, but still far too busy !
    Location:
    dunster somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Just seen this years timetable on Steve Edge's WSR.org website, Impossible to do a round trip to Bishops Lydeard from Minehead on Red timetable days :(.
     
    6960 Raveningham Hall likes this.
  4. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    Just to prove that, once you get to Butlins, there is no escape.....:)
     
    Greenway, Paulthehitch and flyingcow like this.
  5. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,100
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I can't find an original track plan (NLS maps doesn't go back that far). However, it is worth remembering that a platform with adjacent run-road loop (as for example currently at Minehead) was far from universal as a branch terminus layout. Many had a single platform line in which you had to propel back out to a loop outside the station to run round, then propel back in before departure. An advantage of that layout (in construction terms) is that you need a shorter platform for a given length of train, because you don't have what is essentially redundant point work (and its associated extra length to allow for fouling points) taking up platform length that can't be used for passengers.

    A current example of what I mean is at Swanage, where the platform is physically probably about 7 coaches long, but the longest train that can be run round is only five - there is two carriage lengths of essentially wasted space at the end. (By "wasted" I mean "platform length not easily useable by a passenger carriage").

    A West Country example of a station where you had to propel out to run round was Seaton before the SR remodelled it. I think Ilfracombe before remodelling was similar.

    Tom
     
    Bluenosejohn likes this.
  6. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I think Pwllheli is a run in single platform then propel out to a loop to run round on the modern network.
     
    Jamessquared likes this.
  7. Steve B

    Steve B Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,069
    Likes Received:
    1,502
    Location:
    Shropshire
    Thank you, very informative. I have no knowledge of what or why what I saw was happening, but it was definitely Watchet - a) I've never been to Washford, and b) I was standing on the quayside at the time!

    Steve B
     
  8. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    Even when Ilfracombe was remodelled, at first there was no run-round crossover on the Down side until it was added later. An even better example perhaps would be Bridwater North, where you had an arrival platform from which trains were propelled out, run-round and then shunted back into a different departure platform.
     
    Jamessquared likes this.
  9. Premier.Prairie

    Premier.Prairie New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    120
    What's needed is an Auto train :)
     
    malcolm imps likes this.
  10. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    Now, why would you possibly think that?? :):):)
    Autumn Gala 2003-11.jpg
     
  11. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,064
    Likes Received:
    20,773
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    In practical terms, isn't any run-round potential space beyond the foot crossing to the east? Of course, unless Watchet becomes somewhere that trains reverse any track work there would be pointless. (No pun intended.)
     
  12. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    IMHO yes.
     
    mvpeters likes this.
  13. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    IIRC, the max size of PP trains on the GW system is 2+loco+2. The SR/LBSC system handles 3+loco+3, though the only time I've seen photographic evidence of that max was during the sparking up of the North Kent lines and I doubt there are six suitable PP carriages still in existence. Delighted to be proved wrong, BTW.
     
  14. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,100
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Looking at the early Ilfracombe layout, the run round that exists is very short - I did wonder if run rounds were in essence achieved by propelling out of the station, running the loco into the yard, then gravitating the carriages back into the station. The SER did similar I think at Margate Sands.

    Tom
     
    Wenlock likes this.
  15. huochemi

    huochemi Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,751
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The attached is the 1888 map on the Old-Maps.co.uk site. Is this any earlier than the NLS offering?
     

    Attached Files:

    jnc likes this.
  16. Robin Moira White

    Robin Moira White Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Messages:
    11,246
    Likes Received:
    17,946
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Barrister
    Location:
    Stogumber
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Memory must be playing tricks. It has never been possible to pass passenger trains at Watchet. Perhaps you are thinking of Kentsford loop, west of the town adjacent to the paper mill?

    Robin
     
  17. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,100
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  18. Steve B

    Steve B Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,069
    Likes Received:
    1,502
    Location:
    Shropshire
    I'll grant that my memory may be playing tricks as to what was happening, but it was definitely Watchet station, and I remember thinking at the time that "trains don't pass each other at Watchet". Thinking about it more with some of the explanations previously given, I wonder if it was on the occasion when the Prairie I mentioned earlier was shunting the yard, and perhaps the Hymec hauled train came through on the platform line with the Prairie in the loop at the time. Did Watchet have an intermediate block instrument to allow a goods train to be locked into the loop/yard whilst other movements took place? Or perhaps I'm just losing it - it was a long time ago!

    Steve B
     
  19. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    With respect, IIRC you mentioned there being a DMU in the platform and an 'exchange of tokens', which could not have happened as WT was not a token block post. On the other hand, WT did have an intermediate token instrument, so it would have been quite feasible for a passneger train to pass through whilst an engine or goods train was 'shut in' in the yard.
     
  20. Steve B

    Steve B Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,069
    Likes Received:
    1,502
    Location:
    Shropshire
    Thank you - I did mention a DMU, but there I think my memory was playing tricks with me - not an unusual occurrence these days, I'm afraid! Now that you've confirmed the intermediate token instrument, I'm more certain that it was the Prairie in the loop.

    At least it has diverted the thread away from it's more usual fare...

    Steve B
     
    Andy Moody likes this.

Share This Page