If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Discussion in 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' started by gwr4090, Nov 15, 2007.

  1. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,067
    Likes Received:
    20,775
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Am I missing something here?

    All the above talks about the S&DRT in the context of what the WSR might or might not do and this upcoming overhaul of the 7F. My totally detached reading of all this suggests to me that the S&DRT has no expectation that there will be any future link with the WSR in any shape or form except perhaps a hire charge to the WSR should it ever be in a position to hire in the loco again, which I doubt.

    Any supporters of the 7F probably need to forget all about the WSR and perhaps look to what the MHR may be able to do to help into the future.

    The ship has sailed.
     
  2. ghost

    ghost Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,967
    Likes Received:
    5,064
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    N.Ireland
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That depends if the sdrt are willing to forget about the cost of the upcoming overhaul which is owed to them by the wsr.
     
    bingleybong likes this.
  3. Monkey Magic

    Monkey Magic Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2018
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    6,845
    Location:
    Here, there, everywhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Isn't the point that there is an agreement that the WSR should pay for the overhaul. They can't/won't pay. As a result, on top of the costs associated with having to move from Washford, the S&DRT is going to incur a significant additional cost in funding the overhaul itself. All the time that the loco is not running the S&DRT is losing steaming fees as a source of revenue.

    So yes the S&DRT is secure in that it has a location with the MHR/AVR/North Dorset, however, the elephant in the room is the overhaul of the 7F and the costs associated with it.

    Even if the WSR survives it shows little indication that it will honour the agreement.

    You can donate to the WSR, a line which has kicked out the S&DRT, threatened others, purged itself of dissenting volunteers, wasted time and effort on failed reform efforts, bungled the Seaward Way crossing renewal and given every indication of not intending to abide by its agreement to pay for the overhaul of the 7F.

    Or you can donate to the S&DRT, or the lines associated (MHR, AVR, North Dorset)

    as @John Palmer says, the moral case is obvious and clear that the S&DRT is the organisation that should be financially supported.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2021
    green five, Swan Age, ross and 4 others like this.
  4. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,498
    Likes Received:
    5,455
    I do think the last paragraph is interesting. The dilemma presented from the PLC actions does seem to be potentially damaging for the WSR appeal as evidenced here. I also imagine that it’s not a unique view.
     
    ross, Matt37401 and Monkey Magic like this.
  5. staffordian

    staffordian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    2,134
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The Potteries
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    With regard to the apparent ongoing requirement for £1m per year to cover running costs, is it my imagination that not too long ago, JJP was boasting that he had managed to turn round the dire finances of the WSR which he claimed to have "inherited" from the previous incumbents?

    OK, Covid has derailed everyone's plans, but the current planned appeal seems to imply that the shortfall is a permanent issue rather than a temporary blip.

    Either I'm misremembering, or the statement wasn't quite as accurate as JJP claimed...
     
  6. Pete Thornhill

    Pete Thornhill Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Administrator Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    7,498
    Likes Received:
    5,455
    No you are not misremembering, memory jogger on the link below -

    https://www.west-somerset-railway.co.uk/userfiles/userfiles/file/191031 2019 Final Accounts (1).pdf

    Part of the effort to turn the railway around was to sell 4110 (although not to a group of it's own members) and terminate the contract for 44422 (sounds familiar to the story of another ex WSR resident).
     
    Swan Age and staffordian like this.
  7. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,635
    Likes Received:
    8,303
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The trouble with any appeal is that you have to be realistic and there has to be a reason . last year many lines appealed for funds at the onset of lockdown as the crisis was real and pressing . public support was excellent in many cases and railways rode the wave of enthusiasm restarting when conditions eased . I certainly sense now that people are anticipating a return to normality or fifteen months in railways to have adapted and found a new normal that they can operate in . crisis appeals are rather 2020

    This morning the SVR news landed on my doorstep . As always a good read as well as a positive one . Inside is the Bridgnorth works appeal which has a £420k target to be raised and had got off to a good start . I'm far more minded to support this or the S&D trust than something vaguer with a much less tangible outcome . The WSR may need a £1m but it would be far better looking at manageable chunks that have a positive purpose
     
  8. Lineisclear

    Lineisclear Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2020
    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    1,117
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Worcestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I don't think there's much doubt that the lack of investment goes back many years with the cumulative result of the need for a substantial capital injection. Certainly a surplus of £3ook or so was a huge improvement on a reported prior year loss of over £8ook but it masks the real issue that is not unique to the WSR. Many heritage lines cannot realistically generate enough surplus from their activities to fund the essential capital investment required EVERY year to maintain the railway's viability. For a line the length of the WSR, with all the infrastructure costs involved, I think its generally accepted that it needs additional income over and above operating surpluses of around £1m each year. That can come from grants, donations, bequests, sale of shares and appeals which places a huge premium on effective fundraising. As identified in an earlier post the particular problem the WSR faces is that its current structure is not designed to maximise fundraising potential.

    What I really cannot understand is the attitude that because people disapprove of the decisions of current PLC management they will withhold financial support from the railway. Surely the railway is more important than the PLC? If, because people are unwilling to visit and buy tickets, and to donate, the PLC were to become insolvent it seems highly unlikely that anything recognisable as a heritage railway could emerge from the ashes. If you really want to save the railway far better to hold your nose, if you must, and give it your financial support. For instance why not buy shares in the PLC? That way you help financially and your voice can be heard as a shareholder.

    A boycott of support risks not changing PLC management but facilitating the disappearance of what WSR supporters want to preserve. Focus on the railway not its current management. That way there will still be something to build a different future on.
     
    47216, ikcdab and toplight like this.
  9. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,635
    Likes Received:
    8,303
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    valid points , however there is a lot of worthwhile causes to support and limited income to support this with . the nature of the WSR and especially the reputation it has will inevitably impact the success of the appeal . It is one of those situations where a little humility from the railway and acknowledgment that they are listening and acting may work wonders . Rather than the spiral of decline it feels we see now . ceasing action against the four and reinstating those already impacted would be a start
     
    Swan Age, MellishR, Paul42 and 3 others like this.
  10. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,186
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I am very fond of the WSR

    I want it to survive

    But if I give it my money do I think it will be well spent? No.

    Do I think that the management teams are willing to address the issues that led it to be in the situation it is now in? WSRA - seem to be, PLC & WSRHA, not.

    Do I think the WSR is well run? No.

    COVID masks the WSR's underlying problems in terms of structure, accountability & management. I suspect that it may have brought the crisis forward but crisis there certainly would have been.
     
  11. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,494
    Likes Received:
    23,734
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's about the nature of the disagreement, how deep it goes, and what that means for trust. If NYMR ran an appeal that was about it's ability to survive, I'd look to give despite my reservations about it's approach, because I recognise that the leadership at NYMR are doing their best, and the difference between us is about how to achieve that.

    At WSR, I'd struggle to make that case. There is something else about what's going on that sits really ill with me, and which comes down to a fundamental question of trust - do I have the confidence that the body asking for my money has the ability, desire and will to use that for the best interests of the log term future of the WSR? After a couple of very abrasive years, in which there has been minimal communication, no sense of vision, & existing relationships and arrangements have been dismantled, I'm not sure that I do have the desire to give money to an appeal that relies on the same individuals I do not have confidence in. While the hint remains, however implausible, there may be a strategy to force personal takeover by collapsing the company, I also have the issue that I'm not sure I want to donate money to invest in an asset that someone may then take at below value for their own sake - because it won't actually deliver what I would want to contribute to.

    That is before we get to the question about how effectively my donation might be used, given the corporate structures at WSR, and the inability of the core operating body to actually maximise the value of anything I may give.

    Those are strong winds to have to contend with when fund raising, and ones in which stronger ships might well founder.

    If I give, which for a variety of reasons not relevant to this thread is relatively unlikely, it would be through one of the supporting charities, most likely WSRA, as being the nearest way to ensure it is used as I would wish.
     
    MellishR and johnofwessex like this.
  12. RailWest

    RailWest Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    7,442
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    West Country
    I am sure you are correct and is that not what many on here have been saying for a long time?

    However I suspect that there will be many potential supporters/donors who feel that (a) the PLC is acting in a way which gives the impression that it considers itself to be more important than the railway and (b) they can not trust the Plc not to waste any donated funds. How they can be persuaded otherwise remains difficult to see, given the current impression that the Plc is simply blundering/lurching from one crisis to the next....
     
  13. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2015
    Messages:
    9,186
    Likes Received:
    7,226
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Thorn in my managers side
    Location:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Changing the subject for a moment.

    Does anybody know why the PLC has decided it has to get involved with WSHRT issues by disciplining 4 Company ID Card holders when as far as I am aware the WSRHT have taken no action on the matter?
     
    MellishR likes this.
  14. Piggy

    Piggy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2020
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    327
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    All very well but the problem is the current management has effectively engineered its own demise . Ergo ......
     
  15. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,067
    Likes Received:
    20,775
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    In a parallel non railway universe you just don't pour money into any organisation where you have serious concerns about how it is run. What you do is change the team at the top and then, through that team, the organisation tries to rebuild to include drawing in support. I thought that had been tried but people either didn't want that to happen or it was blocked.

    People keep talking about whether the railway is more important than who runs it. The trouble is that a badly run railway will fail eventually whereas a well run railway with possibly intransigent issues may actually pull through.

    I find it strange that some people want to support the railway, come what may. It's not the last heritage railway in town. It isn't even the last decent GWR heritage railway in town. If the line closes some of its assets will end up elsewhere anyway.
     
  16. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,494
    Likes Received:
    23,734
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Do we actually know what the disciplinary action is stated to be for?
     
  17. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,635
    Likes Received:
    8,303
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    only those making the decisions can really answer although many will read between the lines and extrapolate, about control, about individuals
     
  18. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,103
    Likes Received:
    57,433
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    All of that is true. However .. I, like I suspect many people in a similar position, have more demands on my wallet than I have cash to spare. (That includes both railway and non-railway causes, large and small, that are in different ways deserving).

    So I can't support everything: what I do support therefore has to meet certain key criteria. One is about trust: do I think the money will be wisely spent? Do I think it is transformative? And do I think my donation will be used effectively such that the largest possible amount of my donation is used for what I want to support?

    Sadly the WSR - whole railway - fares badly on all scores, and certainly far worse than the other groups I donate to on either a regular or ad-hoc basis. Foremost is the complete rejection of any moves towards a better structure. The WSR plc has said that they cannot afford the legal changes that that would entail, yet in the same breath are talking about a major share issue that would likely have at least equally significant compliance costs. So I don't trust the railway to spent a donation wisely when they are clearly demonstrating an ongoing inability to get their house in order.

    Do I think a donation would be transformative? Absolutely not: the railway has been very opaque as to what it wants the money for, and in as much as it has said, it just comes back to "ongoing support". I'm not so naive as to think that other railways aren't in basically a similar position, but perception counts: if I donate to a "restore the station" fund, I realise that next year we will probably have a "restore this carriage fund" but at least I can be confident that the station has had an overhaul that will see it in good stead for another 50 or 100 years. I don't get that sense of transformation from the vagaries of the WSR appeal. My worry is that large amounts will be absorbed paying for things that, rightly or wrongly, I think should be covered from operating income.

    And value for money: I'm not buying shares in the plc, because I want Mr Sunak to chip in his 25% of Gift Aid. And for the charities, I want to know my donation isn't eroded by administration costs. Co-incidentally, I got the combined Bluebell accounts for 2019; and in the section for the Trust (our charity bit), against an annual income of £1,215,669, there were "Administration" and "Fundraising" expenses of £10,549. The accompanying comment read "Of note are the very low levels of administrative and fundraising expenses, in total less than 1% of income. As these costs are broadly covered by the interest on monies held on deposit, supporters can be confident that virtually all their gifts are spent for the direct benefit of the Bluebell Railway." Could I read an equivalent statement in any of the WSR charity accounts?

    Tom
     
  19. ghost

    ghost Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,967
    Likes Received:
    5,064
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    N.Ireland
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    At the minute, the PLC is the railway. The PLC controls who can/cannot volunteer, it controls the train operations, it holds the LRO, it holds the lease of the land/buildings, it controls the commercial operations.

    Why would anyone want to give money to a railway (plc) that is so power hungry that it cannot countenance any kind of reform, interferes in the affairs of a separate charity, evicts a long standing tenant group and backtracks on its financial commitments to a loco they have had 8? years worth of work from, and when a volunteer/donor questions a decision they are removed from operations and sidelined (see Andy Norman).

    Why not go to a railway where your vote/opinion actually counts for something, management is transparent and accountable, your donations will make a difference and most of all it is enjoyable to be a member and/or volunteer.
     
    Keith Sims, ross, Fish Plate and 9 others like this.
  20. Matt37401

    Matt37401 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2014
    Messages:
    15,330
    Likes Received:
    11,667
    Occupation:
    Nosy aren’t you?
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I’m off to do an 8 hour shift at work shortly, tomorrow I’m doing 12 hours, I work bloody hard so that myself, my partner, the guys I work with and their families have a decent standard of living, I don’t have a lot of spare cash at the moment so I’m rather choosy about what I like to spend/donate my surplus cash on.

    As someone who has an interest in railways give me one good reason why the WSR with its recent general ineptitude is deserving of any of my spare hard earned cash?
     

Share This Page