If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Electrification of the Settle and Carlisle

Discussion in 'Everything Else Heritage' started by Tiviot Dale, Nov 10, 2014.

  1. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    21,067
    Likes Received:
    20,775
    Location:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That is one of the best suggestions I've seen for a long time. In the grand scheme of things HS2 could easily go on hold while the cross Pennine route is sorted out. But you would need Westminster to be moved to Westhoughton before that was seen as a sensible priority!
     
    26D_M likes this.
  2. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    Is Leeds-Manchester being electrified ? (as part of this Manchester curve and Liverpool - Manchester electrification ? - I don't know but thought it was ?)
     
  3. Victor

    Victor Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    13,773
    Likes Received:
    7,941
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    DEWSBURY West Yorkshire
    Unless I've misunderstood this from Network Rail:-
    Funding to electrify the North Transpennine route was announced in November 2011.

    Work has started to modify bridges between Manchester Victoria and Guide Bridge to Stalybridge, which will be fully electrified by December 2016.

    East of Stalybridge, we're assessing the bridges and tunnels between Manchester, Leeds and Colton Junction on the East Coast Main Line to understand which structures need to be modified for electrification. The outcome of this work will be discussed with local authorities and stakeholders over the coming months.

    A fully electrified route will be provided between Manchester, Leeds and York by December 2018, linking up with the electrified lines at Leeds and York.
     
  4. oldmrheath

    oldmrheath Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,265
    Likes Received:
    2,452
    O/T I know , but the East-West Rail link seems another route that just makes sense- the current requirement to go via St Pancras from Bedford to get to either Oxford or Cambridge is a poor option

    Jon
     
    Hirn likes this.
  5. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    It'll be an improvement with Crossrail (I dint say perfect), but Oxford-Reading-Liverpool St - Cambridge will be an option..
    but with GWML electrification wouldnt the possibility exist to do through services faster speeds either side of the capital and offer a direct service between the two ?
     
  6. Christopher125

    Christopher125 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    558
    Location:
    Isle of Wight
    That is indeed correct, electrification between Manchester and York/Selby should get underway in early 2016 for completion by late 2018.

    The full scope is set out on page 109 of the latest CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan (.pdf)

    Crossrail wouldn't be suited to long distance services nor would it be practical to share the tunnel under London but reopening/upgrading and electrifying the western section of East West Rail between Oxford, Bletchley and Bedford has already got the go ahead and they are looking at the best route to connect through to Cambridge.

    Chris
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2014
  7. ADB968008

    ADB968008 Guest

    Why ?
    Why ?

    It is being built with some quite long distances in mind Reading to Shenfield is 80 miles...

    I'm not convinced by demand between Oxford and Cambridge is enough to warrant that kind of line ?
    I remember that student airline that flew between Oxford and Cambridge.. had plans to be a 30 minute or so air bridge of all that demand...
    how long did it last.. 1 week...
    How many passengers did it leave stranded...thousands, hundreds, tens... er 13.

    to quote it's operator
    http://www.theguardian.com/business/2006/feb/02/theairlineindustry.travelnews
    Hundreds every week ?.... surely to justify this kind of investment we should be looking at thousands every day ? not a hundred a week...
    If the service was hourly each way, 12 hours a day.. thats 168 trains... or 0.6 passengers per train ????

    Surely there's a better way of spending £600m+ on the whole project, which ultimately only adds 6 miles of track, and renovates a bunch of older / lesser used lines ?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 15, 2014
  8. Christopher125

    Christopher125 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    558
    Location:
    Isle of Wight
    Few people, if any, would actually use an all-stations Crossrail service over that kind of distance and it's not being built with that in mind; it's primary role is relieving Tube capacity in Central London and increasing inner-suburban capacity on the GWML and GEML - this means 90mph metro-style trains with lots of wide doors, plenty of standing room and at least some longitudinal seating to maximise capacity and minimise time spent in stations.

    Such rolling stock would be unsuitable for long distance journeys nor could other designs share the tunnel under Central London - to maximise capacity that will operate like a modern tube line with every train identical and automatically operated with platform edge doors aligned with those on the trains.

    It's so much more than that - connecting the Great Western, West Coast, Chiltern and Midland Mainlines opens up massive opportunities for freight and local/cross country passenger services between Oxford, Bicester, Milton Keynes, Aylesbury and perhaps beyond to High Wycombe, Bristol, Reading etc.

    You can get an idea of the potential from page 4 and 5 of this NR presentation to local councillors - these show the 'core' specification initially proposed and the 'enhanced' spec being considered.

    Chris
     
    oldmrheath likes this.
  9. simon

    simon Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    11,567
    Likes Received:
    5,224
    Interesting that the OP appears not to have returned since starting this thread.
     
  10. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    16,510
    Likes Received:
    7,753
    Location:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    He was possibly expecting a rabble armed with pitchforks to join him ... ? :D
     
  11. tor-cyan

    tor-cyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,196
    Likes Received:
    1,480
    Gender:
    Male
    I think the rabble are all to busy down in west somerset, and its a long way to carry your pitchfork.
    No best to keep the rabble where they can use there pitchforks to best advantage :p

    cheers
    colin
     
  12. ZorkiBoy

    ZorkiBoy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2021
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Carlisle
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    When are Bibbys of Ingleton going to electrify their replacement bus fleet? One thing is certain, as long as there are railways, you’ll never be short of work - as a bus driver!
     
  13. 60017

    60017 Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2008
    Messages:
    9,002
    Likes Received:
    7,891
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired from corporate slavery :o)
    Location:
    Fylde Coast
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The OP is no longer with us, which might explain why he never returned.
     
  14. goldfish

    goldfish Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    14,900
    Likes Received:
    12,241
    @simon’s post that you just replied to is 7 years old.
     
  15. Hirn

    Hirn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2015
    Messages:
    462
    Likes Received:
    295
    Gender:
    Male
    What about 4 rails? 2,000 volts - 2 kv- should be quite possible on the basis that when the Southern 3rd rail had just been switched in to a substation the voltage transitorily became 1,000 volts and everything took this fine, then have one rail positive+ 1,000 volts with the other negative - 1,000 volts so 2,000 volts between them.

    Same principle as between the phases of 3 phase. Just like between the 3rd & 4th rails on the underground. A lot of heavy haul electrification has been put in at 1,500 - 3,000 volts DC, whether AC pick up is possible from a third rail I’m not sure..

    Apart from open countryside by the Pennines - which could perfectly well have masts like over Shap on the Lancaster and Carlisle - through Bath should not have the heavy portal frames with clumsy detail which are now from Cardiff to Paddington despite particular landscapes like along the Thames and through the Vale of the White Horse.
     
  16. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,494
    Likes Received:
    23,734
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Decidedly unlikely. Even if the idea of a major extension to third rail electrification were contemplated, the requirement for another bespoke on train electric collection system would be a showstopper.

    On a pedantic point, SR electrification is 750v DC, and London Underground 4th rail slightly lower voltage. The only higher voltage DC systems were the 1200v side contact 3rd rail on the Bury branch, and the few (notably Woodhead and GE) 1500v overhead systems.

    I suspect 2000v DC at track level would have caused kittens even in earlier, less H&S conscious, days.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  17. Martin Adalar

    Martin Adalar New Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2018
    Messages:
    184
    Likes Received:
    64
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    5D
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The cost of global warming is far greater than the cost of electrification, besides these companies would not make this large investment in diesels if there was a rolling program of putting up more wires instead of making everything so expensive.
     
  18. Martin Adalar

    Martin Adalar New Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2018
    Messages:
    184
    Likes Received:
    64
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    5D
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    You cannot pause such a large project: you either carry on or cancel it and write off the huge costs already spent, there is no in-between.
     
  19. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,494
    Likes Received:
    23,734
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    If we're resuscitating this discussion, I'd note that investment is shifting away from diesels, and that much of that investment is now 10-20 years old (the class 66s are up to 24 years old now:eek:).
     

Share This Page