If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

7027 Thornbury Castle

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by svrhunt, Jan 18, 2015.

  1. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,036
    Likes Received:
    15,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I would suggest that after the events on the last 4 days or so even that is optimistic, the 4709 group seem to have managed the rather laudable task of not only holing their own project below the waterline but also striking a pretty substantial hit on the overall credibility of the GWS as a whole. I note that the GWs statement makes much of the autonomous nature of the 4709 group, if so who are they then, I note the website is entirely silent on any manner structure or management, someone must have signed the cheque for the suggested £300k purchase price who was it then?

    Moving forward as and when 7027 leaves the GCR where is she going and who is going facilitate the demise of her, I recall suggestion that 4709's frames are presently at Tyseley, would they want their reputation dragged into this shambles by allowing a part restored locomotive to be stripped on their premises, likewise it would be brave to do it on site at Didcot?

    I suspect this has a fair old way to go and those who are the coalface of it are not helping their case with, as its stands, unconfined suggestions that the previous owner is dead/ill etc, just again sounds like they are making it up as they go along.
     
    Gareth, pmh_74, GWRman and 7 others like this.
  2. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,294
    Likes Received:
    3,596
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    AIUI 7027 has not been bought with the intention of stripping its frames - what is there on it that the 4709 needs and doesn't already have? It's the boiler that they want.
     
  3. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,036
    Likes Received:
    15,730
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    OK, but the same applies to the stripping of the boiler, which will ultimately be the act which seals the fate of 7027. Plus they will need to find somewhere to store the frames which will remain to be a matter of great contention for a lot of people.
     
  4. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,065
    Likes Received:
    5,160
    The boiler will need a considerable amount of work before it can be steamed, whatever loco it is going on. If the 4709 project does still use it (which is now looking less and less likely) it will need much the same amount of work as if it is eventually to go back on 7027's frames; at most perhaps some modification of mounting points.
     
    crusader612 likes this.
  5. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,121
    Likes Received:
    20,771
    Occupation:
    Training moles
    Location:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    They should go and build a new one a la A1 and P2 projects rather than butcher a Castle that seemed to have a decent future.
     
    Gareth, Mick45305, Johnme101 and 10 others like this.
  6. 1472

    1472 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,898
    Likes Received:
    2,517
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    All of which begs an interesting question:

    If you were previously enticed into being a donor to the 4709 project should you now be given the opportunity to have your contribution refunded given the now expedient, half cocked, off piste direction being taken regarding the boiler in particular?


    There is off course a solution to all this which involves a helping of humble pie, clear resumption of the plan to provide a new No 7 boiler and either withdrawal from the purchase of 7027 or onward sale, at cost, intact to a group formed specifically for the Castle ownership should the sale have actually already taken place.

    If that was done I strongly suspect that many would then contribute to the 4709 project seeing that it had become a proper scheme to produce a 47xx and that the folk steering the project were not in fact a bunch of untrustworthy wide boys who will stop at nothing for their own dream/nightmare.

    There is though limited time to sort this
    - say by the end of this week if the damage done to both this project and the GWS as a whole is to be minimised (and reversible).

    To the project leaders
    - Do you have the balls to do it? - many are waiting to see your next move and you must surely by now realise that you are in a mess and at a crossroads with this.

    To the GWS Management - you simply cannot distance yourselves from the actions of those involved in this. It is taking place on your watch involving a scheme under your umbrella. You too have a choice - leadership which results in the suggested course above or dithering and tacit acceptance which will stain your reputation indelibly and indefinitely. (Said as a GWS life member).
     
    Hirn, Gareth, Mick45305 and 21 others like this.
  7. goldfish

    goldfish Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    14,900
    Likes Received:
    12,241
    That's really not an interesting question. It's absolute pie in the sky.

    The only choice donors have is to donate in the future or not. It's not like buying clothes that don't fit at M&S, taking them back and getting a refund.

    Simon
     
  8. Scrat

    Scrat New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2015
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    82
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    railway worker
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Yes, a nice coat of paint, which gives a quick visual difference.

    What serious mechanical work has been carried out to date?
     
  9. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,483
    Likes Received:
    23,713
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Not entirely true, though I suspect most would get the answer that their donation had been spent.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  10. 1472

    1472 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,898
    Likes Received:
    2,517
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Do you understand the concept of misrepresentation?
     
    Hirn, Gareth, GWRman and 1 other person like this.
  11. misspentyouth62

    misspentyouth62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,380
    Likes Received:
    1,736
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    34D, now flexible
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Over the years, I've tended to spread my relative insignificant contributions evenly & thinly across many projects and many Barry wrecks that I've seen reborn. In terms of the new builds, I'll be first to announce that I was very sceptical when many of these projects were first muted and probably didn't want to contribute for any white elephants. On the other hand I have developed a liking for visionaries and have enjoyed being found wrong in my early scepticism. Not forgetting that many of what we have and are in-build, were being talked about multiple decades ago and most haven't yet steamed. I would be reluctant to contribute in any significant terms for something that I don't think will come to fruition and if they do, it probably won't be in my lifetime. I think the HR sector as a whole is unrealistic to what it can collectively achieve with the challenges faced and resources that will be available. Just my opinion of course. If we really want Didcot to become a site full of locos many in steam, we either need to roll our sleeves up or reset our expectations I would say. It isn't 1975 any more, just as it isn't 2015 or 1955 ;-)

    In terms of the point made in bold, what would p*** me off the most would be if I had donated any parts or monies towards the 7027 restoration at Loughborough. Facebook shows a plethora of parts collected and manufactured for both loco and it's tender which at this point, seems to have been wasted.
     
    Gareth, GWRman, green five and 2 others like this.
  12. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,483
    Likes Received:
    23,713
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Beware of emotive language. Misrepresentation would imply that the statements made were false at the time that they were made; it does not mean that they precluded a future change of approach.

    For example, I signed up to a project to support 35022's unrebuilding. That project morphed into takeover by SLL and then sale of the locomotive to Jeremy Hosking. Those were both significant changes of tack, but there is no question that those changes meant that the original prospectus was in some way a misrepresentation.
     
  13. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,634
    Likes Received:
    8,301
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Sometimes I wish we had a better show of appreciation than a simple like to @1472 's post above

    what we have learned the last few days is 7027 does have a lot support that an opportunity to be part of an owning group suggests charts a more successful path forward for it

    we have also learned that 4709 as currently being built isn't a 47xx as churchward built but a quite modified one with changed springing, Cylinders and boiler height to oestensibly fit on Network Rail even though it may be questionable whether there is a TOC to run it , support crew or even funding to fit the gubbins

    one thing regular donors can do in protest is stop standing orders , a hit to the income stream can quickly change thought processes
     
    Gareth, 5944, Gwrman 1985 and 4 others like this.
  14. goldfish

    goldfish Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    14,900
    Likes Received:
    12,241
    Precisely. Bitching about what's gone before achieves nothing except sending good money after bad. By all means register in the strongest possible terms, including withholding future money from the project, objections to the actions of the organisers. But going after gifts already given will only harm the sector, not recover your money.

    Simon
     
  15. 242A1

    242A1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,558
    Likes Received:
    1,299
    So the group that wants to build 4709 is not building a 47xx. Not one that is true to the original anyway. So was the creation of the next locomotive in the series a viable exercise from the outset?

    It would be, like much else, given sufficient funding. Whether the outcome could justify that funding is another matter.

    The locomotive is too restricted to see much if any use on the national network. There are preserved lines which might be able to make use of it but 7808 (last steamed in 1983) would be far more useful.

    The A1 Steam Locomotive Trust assembled the boiler cladding on 2007 and it looked fairly complete, so maybe a mock-up Number 7 boiler would allow the engine to be displayed at Didcot while funding was raised to build a real boiler. The fact that the engine would not work is neither here or there. Didcot has many engines which have not worked in quite a few years adding another one would have no impact though in a way it might be useful as a fund raising tool with regard to the actual boiler needed.

    Was the exercise really viable? It could produce a very expensive display piece for Didcot but without the necessary money, something will have to be sacrificed.
     
    1472 likes this.
  16. Musket The Dog

    Musket The Dog New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2022
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    380
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    Leicestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    If the 4709 group do change their stance and offer the locomotive for sale, how long should they be expected to keep that offer open while the prospective owning group gets the money together to do it?

    I see that one of the previous owners has offered to get involved and help, but is this fronting the heavy end of the lump of cash or just organising? If it really is £300K's worth of engine, is that money out there right now to get the job done and realistically if not; why should the new owners bear the burden of storing 7027 for a group who might one day get the cash together?

    Just as a over-simplified statistic assuming the above price, all the people who have signed the petition as of now would need to donate a little over £550 each to buy it.
     
  17. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I'd image a few folks will have an eye on how the 'newbuilds' fare, come the end of a 10 year ticket?

    Don't get me wrong, I'm never one to criticise ambition and I recognise there are always going to compromises involved in keeping things jogging along, but I've a nagging suspicion the existing Didcot collection is being allowed to wither while the spotlight is on the headline grabbers. I do hope I'm wrong .....
     
  18. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    9,634
    Likes Received:
    8,301
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Problem with that attitude is we wouldn't have a preservation movement , an A1 , 71000 and all the other preservation achievements
     
  19. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    That wasn't the case in the late 80's, early 90's when I last worked at Didcot, but overhauling a privately owned locomotive is a means by which the GWS can increase their share of ownership in the loco concerned. That's why, I suspect, 4144 got the vote over 6106, especially given, that at the time, 6106 was a running engine and 4144 an ex-Barry hulk.
     
  20. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    190
    For what reason and in what way?
     

Share This Page