If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

'Sensible' New Builds

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by alexl102, Sep 12, 2022.

  1. Steve B

    Steve B Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,069
    Likes Received:
    1,502
    Location:
    Shropshire
    What did you have for lunch today....
    ....and can I have some?

    Steve B
     
  2. The Green Howards

    The Green Howards Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2016
    Messages:
    14,115
    Likes Received:
    7,639
    Occupation:
    Layabout
    Location:
    Naughty step
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Striking a somewhat pessimistic note, I struggle to see the V3 getting built and the K3 (if another A1SLT project) even less so.
     
    Gav106 likes this.
  3. Richard Roper

    Richard Roper Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Librarian
    Location:
    Just up the road from 56E Sowerby Bridge
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I hope they do, but am not holding out for an appearance during my lifetime.

    Richard.
     
  4. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    If we're talking stereotypes, I've just realised ..... amidst all those thousands of old photos of GW pagodas and goods workings, I've yet to see any image of any goods wagon carrying a single sheet of corrugated iron. :Smuggrin:

    More seriously, thinking on Stanier's departure for pastures new and his subsequent none too successful 2-6-2T, you have to wonder why he didn't do as he did later with the Lizzies and ..... what was that 4-6-0 he developed from the Halls? ..... and develop his own 2-6-2T along the lines of the Swindon school of design.

    It seems incredible Stanier wouldn't have been aware of the issues with Fowler's earlier design, yet with his intimate knowledge of Swindon practices (and his own decidedly iconoclastic tendencies), all he achieved was to confirm why the Fowler loco was a dud, with a dud of his own, near doubling the number of modern, but still dud 2-6-Ts the company owned. If this were some Machiavellian exercise in bring the Derby D.O to heel, it was a ruddy expensive way of going about it. There must've been something more to the story

    In terms of overall length, Riddles 82xxx was closer to it's LMS predecessors and the GW's 'large praries'. Both LMS and the later BR class 3 employed 5'-3" dia drivers, where on the GW 'small praries' that was 4'-7½" (w/base 5'-6" + 6'-0") and on the 'large prairies' 5'-8" (w/base 7'-0" + 7'-9"). Would that be enough for Stanier to eschew the familiar, in favour of the unsuccessful?
     
  5. S.A.C. Martin

    S.A.C. Martin Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,591
    Likes Received:
    9,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Asset Engineer (Signalling), MNLPS Treasurer
    Location:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    How "dud" are we talking here? 139 examples built, in the mid-30s, and withdrawn at the onset of dieselisation, in the early 60s, giving around 25-30 years work, being employed on day to day working operations of the railway...

    This sounds awfully like half the stuff aimed against the LNER's Thompson L1 class: digging into the primary evidence and a look at the evidence we have available, I sincerely doubt these were "duds".
     
  6. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    25,483
    Likes Received:
    23,713
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Possibly, or possibly just that they were mediocre but competent enough to undermine any case for replacement. In which case, not "duds" but not good enough either.
     
  7. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    5,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Pretty 'dud', actually. They were too heavy and steaming was not brilliant. The fact is that when Ivatt introduced his Class 2 2-6-2Ts, they would easily out-perform the Fowler - and Stanier - engines, which were supposed to be Class 3, and certainly so over any distance.
     
  8. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    8,068
    Likes Received:
    5,162
    And the Bulleid concept for the Southern (apart from electrification of course) really was just four classes, one of them best forgotten about altogether and two of the others just slightly different sizes of the same thing, so really only two designs worth bothering with.
     
  9. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2017
    Messages:
    12,172
    Likes Received:
    11,493
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Regrettably, I tend to concur. I cannot for the life of me think of a way around the design's asymmetric weight distribution. Maybe a modified 'Turf Burner' (square) boiler, with a longitudinal (extremely brisk) walk through corridor? No? Maybe not!
     
    Paulthehitch and LMS2968 like this.
  10. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I sometimes wonder if Stanier was fighting a battle with his drawing office. Whilst there are tales of him saying that "the way we've always done it" is no justification, it's pretty evident that at least some of the time they carried on the way they'd always done it anyway. I might, I suppose, be forcing my own interpretation on the text, but in the book by Cox I have I seem to read a lot of subtext of the drawing office pushing back for their traditional practices.

    Holcroft talks about ex LSWR design having a tendency to revert to Urie unless carefully watched, and I wonder if there was a similar tendency atv the LMS - to revert to Anderson perhaps?
     
    Steve, Paul42, LMS2968 and 1 other person like this.
  11. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    26,099
    Likes Received:
    57,414
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Looking at Stanier's biography up to his move to the LMS, he spent over half his time (out of forty years on the GWR) in some kind of workshop role, including his last twenty years as - firstly - Assistant Works Manager, and then Works Manager, at Swindon. By contrast, he spent only three years in the drawing office, and that was as a relatively junior stage in his career, and before Churchward.

    He then went to the LMS. From what I can see, the significant problem wasn't really about workshop organisation or efficiency; rather, it was melding three disparate design schools into a single standard LMS design school, from a starting point in which none of Crewe, Derby or Horwich could really be seen as at the forefront of locomotive design of the era. Hence his struggles: a workshop man with very limited design expertise placed in charge of a department where the issue was design, not workshop practice. My sense is that loco design then became somewhat hit and miss: successes (like the Black 5s) and duds (like the 2-6-2T) but my hunch is Stanier didn't have the design acumen to be able to spot the duds before they left the drawing office.

    If I were being controversial, sometimes I wonder "if Stanier was the answer, did Josiah Stamp ask the wrong question?"

    Tom
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2022
    clinker, MellishR, Steve and 5 others like this.
  12. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    5,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Have a read of Eric Langridge from Derby D.O. (Under 10 CMEs) and that becomes plain, with frequent comments along the lines of weaning Stanier off GWR principles (Langridge started with the LSWR, and hated the GWR with a passion!). But Stanier was not a designer as such - most CMEs weren't - and left that to the Drawing Offices, soon overseen by Tom Coleman, ex-North Staffs.

    As has been pointed out before, the CME was primarily a manager and administrator, and the bulk of his work was repair and maintenance rather than new build and the design work that entailed.
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2022
  13. Cartman

    Cartman Well-Known Member Account Suspended

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,290
    Likes Received:
    1,672
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Van driver
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I think that Staniers only dud was the 2-6-2 tank, all his Other designs were excellent. Arguably the 5X Jubilees needed a bit of fettling and had to have a bit of work, but the others were pretty good from the start
     
  14. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Harsh, I think Stanier was a good choice, an external appointment was I submit vital, but perhaps he was too keen not to be seen as simply a Churchward follower, and might have benefitted from importing a Swindon draughtsman, maybe a front end and/or boiler specialist.
     
    used2be, Paul42, RLinkinS and 2 others like this.
  15. Dunfanaghy Road

    Dunfanaghy Road Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2019
    Messages:
    1,252
    Likes Received:
    1,566
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Alton, Hants
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Langridge mentioned a visit by WAS to the Derby DO in which he queried the use of short-travel valves on the last batch of 0-4-4T's, which had SLIDE valves! Langridge was unimpressed.
    He was hired, surely, because he could run a large, and expensive, department - and to break the state of undeclared warfare in the MP Dept.
    Pat
     
    LMS2968 and Jimc like this.
  16. Hermod

    Hermod Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2017
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Klitmoeller,Denmark
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Staniers legacy was that future UK boilers would have narrow grates between wheels and strange corners hindering the field of view for crew.
    It was never proven that it was worth the higher cost of manufacture.
     
  17. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    5,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Location:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    More a Churchward legacy, to be honest, rather than Stanier. And the Belpaire boiler was hardly confined to the LMS and GWR, or Britain.

    I take it you've never been on a Stanier engine on the move? Forward visibility was limited by the smokebox rather than firebox, as with all engines, but the taper boiler allowed a smaller diameter smokebox so, if anything, aided forward visibility.
     
    used2be, Bluenosejohn, Paul42 and 2 others like this.
  18. Hermod

    Hermod Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2017
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Klitmoeller,Denmark
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    My only footplate ride was once on a Heisler along Pacific coast Tillamook,
    Germany made Belpaire 2-8-2s and 2-10-0s in great numbers around WW1 and rebuilt quite some with round tops later.
    Never the other way.
    France built some metre gauge Belpaires after WW2 for export but none for own use.
    Pennsylvania stuck to Belpaires until end with the wild Duplex locomotives.
    Not many Belpaires made in rest of USA for own use and exports.
    World final verdict not worth the extra trouble and expence I would say.
     
  19. ady

    ady Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    2,369
    Likes Received:
    281
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Post office
    Location:
    South
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That locomotive (LMS 2P Edit:0-4-4T) might a sensible new build project. Would be useful. Fills a historical niche as no LMS small passenger tanks survive. I think it had a boiler similar (the same?) as a Jinty (cylinders too?), thus a new 2P could benefit the surviving Jinties. And quite cheap to build compared to some, I think they were saturated so James would be happy with that.

    However I doubt enthusiasts at large would want to support that probably preferring the earlier Midland 1P design...
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2022
  20. Jimc

    Jimc Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    4,665
    Occupation:
    Once computers, now part time writer I suppose.
    Location:
    SE England
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    As so often with steam era kit there doesn't seem to be much in firm evidence either way. Enthusiasts of and even engineers from particular lines assert that their solution was the best, but real evidence seems thin on the ground. It seems quite clear, for instance, that Churchward found his boilers considerably cheaper to own than the previous round top ones, but was that because of the Belpaire shape, or other design improvements?
     

Share This Page