If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

BR Standard class 6 No. 72010 'Hengist' and Clan Discussion Thread

Тема в разделе 'Steam Traction', создана пользователем Bulleid Pacific, 23 ноя 2009.

  1. 22A

    22A Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    8 сен 2005
    Сообщения:
    1.105
    Симпатии:
    99
    Род занятий:
    Administrator
    Адрес:
    Between 31F & 34E
    In a book by Paul Beevor(?) he suggested that the trouble with BR was that locos tended to stick to their original lines. He continued with BR should have taken a look at the entire stock and had say, MNs working Liverpool - Glasgow, WC & BBs Leeds Carlisle and transfer V2s and Black 5s to the Southern.
    But this is digression; back to the Hengist topic....
     
  2. Bikermike

    Bikermike Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    11 мар 2020
    Сообщения:
    1.814
    Симпатии:
    2.045
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Thameslink territory
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Were the BFB wheels patented? In any event, there was plenty of expertise on how to make spoked wheels, and quicker to use that capacity than go down the path of spreading the expertise?

    In terms of boilers, Bulleid Pacifics did have a hefty appetite for coal, so were not perfect. One of the locomen books commented they had no dampers, which meant they were always wasting steam if the crew wasn't absolutely perfect letting the fire run down before station stops etc
     
  3. gwralatea

    gwralatea Member

    Дата регистрации:
    31 дек 2014
    Сообщения:
    510
    Симпатии:
    1.002
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    He's got a point, but can you imagine the chaos? Pretty much the whole WR outside South Wales infested with 'not invented here' syndrome; the angst when WR sheds in the West Midlands were transferred to LM, or ER sheds on the GC ditto; the completely different performances of the L1 - fine or absolutely hated depending on which shed you talk to....

    Sending locos to where they could do a job is absolutely logical - it just ignores the crews, the maintenance regimes (and locations), etc.
     
  4. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2017
    Сообщения:
    12.172
    Симпатии:
    11.496
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired
    Адрес:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Wasn't that only true of the earliest MNs, as built?
     
  5. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2008
    Сообщения:
    27.790
    Симпатии:
    64.456
    Адрес:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    You have to think about Route Availability as well - loading gauge and weight limit. The light Pacifics were built deliberately for use on lines with a low axle load limit and restricted loading gauge - on the South Eastern section, often they replaced pairs of 4-4-0s previously needed for heavy trains.

    So hypothetically - you could send 50 light Pacifics to the Western Region, but what then? You couldn’t automatically cope with 50 Halls in return because they wouldn’t fit.

    Tom
     
    S.A.C. Martin, Bluenosejohn, Paul42 и ещё 1-му нравится это.
  6. srapley

    srapley New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    27 июл 2008
    Сообщения:
    78
    Симпатии:
    103
    Род занятий:
    Aerodynamicist (by day)/CME 35011 (spare time)
    Адрес:
    Burton-on-Trent
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Nope. The MNs had dampers from day one, though they were modified on rebuilding. The LPs had no dampers to start with, but they were added on rebuilding. Free grate area on the MNs was reduced on rebuilding as well from 50% to 30 something%
     
  7. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2008
    Сообщения:
    27.790
    Симпатии:
    64.456
    Адрес:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    What’s the “free grate area”? I’m curious about that change given that I wasn’t aware that much happened to the boilers on rebuilding.

    Tom
     
  8. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    7 окт 2006
    Сообщения:
    12.729
    Симпатии:
    11.847
    Род занятий:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Адрес:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Free gas area?
     
    LMS2968 нравится это.
  9. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2008
    Сообщения:
    27.790
    Симпатии:
    64.456
    Адрес:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I wondered that - but in which case, why did it change so dramatically on rebuilding given the boilers were largely untouched?

    Tom
     
    LMS2968 нравится это.
  10. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    1 сен 2006
    Сообщения:
    3.072
    Симпатии:
    5.361
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Адрес:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Was there any change to the superheater elements which might alter it?
     
  11. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2008
    Сообщения:
    27.790
    Симпатии:
    64.456
    Адрес:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Not that I’m aware of. There was a small change to the arrangement of taper between the earliest and later MN boilers, which reduced weight without any other significant change. Boiler pressures were reduced from 280 to 250 after a period in service. But I’m not aware of any significant changes to tube or flue layouts.

    Tom
     
  12. Eightpot

    Eightpot Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    10 авг 2006
    Сообщения:
    8.340
    Симпатии:
    2.506
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Engineer Emeritus
    Адрес:
    Aylesbury
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Area of firebars relative to the air space between them?
     
  13. srapley

    srapley New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    27 июл 2008
    Сообщения:
    78
    Симпатии:
    103
    Род занятий:
    Aerodynamicist (by day)/CME 35011 (spare time)
    Адрес:
    Burton-on-Trent
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Space between the fire bars I think. Weight diagram for the original quotes 50%, for the rebuilt it came down to 30 something%. The only significant changes were the firegrate and below it (dampers, ashpans etc.), reduction in size of the superheater header, and the change to the chimney. The modifications to the exhaust massively improved the smokebox draught produced, which was necessary due to the increased resistance to air flow for the air coming into the firebox
     
    Last edited: 24 ноя 2022
  14. srapley

    srapley New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    27 июл 2008
    Сообщения:
    78
    Симпатии:
    103
    Род занятий:
    Aerodynamicist (by day)/CME 35011 (spare time)
    Адрес:
    Burton-on-Trent
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The superheater surface area was reduced a bit, mainly in the header I believe, in order for it to fit into the round smokebox, I don't think the tubes themselves were altered, but I've not looked into that yet. Though we're digressing a tad from the Std 6...
     
    LMS2968 нравится это.
  15. Tobbes

    Tobbes Member

    Дата регистрации:
    14 авг 2010
    Сообщения:
    935
    Симпатии:
    2.608
    Other than being detuned by reducing the BP to 250 psi - presumably the reduced maintenance costs offset the 11% loss of maximum tractive effort (or perhaps it was simply not required) - I've never heard that the boilers themselves were modified by Jarvis. Were the boilers interchangable (and interchanged) between the modified and unmodified locomotives?
     
  16. srapley

    srapley New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    27 июл 2008
    Сообщения:
    78
    Симпатии:
    103
    Род занятий:
    Aerodynamicist (by day)/CME 35011 (spare time)
    Адрес:
    Burton-on-Trent
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I would think so, in theory, except if you put an original exhaust with a rebuilt firebox, you might have some issues due to poor draughting. The other way round you might have the reverse problem (excessive draughting). On 35011 we're likely to have something other than the original exhaust for that reason. The 30psi reduction happened before rebuilding, and we won't be reversing it. More information is available via the GSN thread of course or www.35011gsn.co.uk (apologies for thread drift!)
     
    Tobbes нравится это.
  17. 30854

    30854 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2017
    Сообщения:
    12.172
    Симпатии:
    11.496
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired
    Адрес:
    Brighton&Hove
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Given when the rebuilding program occurred, I've often wondered to what extent the growth of car ownership was eating into passenger train weights. The 'magic number' on the Southern seems to have been the ability to shift 500 tons (was that behind the tender, or including the loco?).

    For comparison purposes, the 13 car CEP/BEP/CEP/MLV formation most usually seen on services between Victoria and the Channel Ports tipped the scales at something just short of 530 tons.
     
  18. std tank

    std tank Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    20 сен 2005
    Сообщения:
    3.927
    Симпатии:
    1.070
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired
    Адрес:
    Liverpool
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Was this because finger bars similar to those used on Standard loco classes, were used for the grates on the rebuilds?
     
  19. ianh1

    ianh1 Member

    Дата регистрации:
    10 май 2018
    Сообщения:
    230
    Симпатии:
    719
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Lots of progress today - see https://www.theclanproject.org/Clan_News.php

    We now have 4 bogie wheels on their assembled axleboxes. 61 tons minimum force is required when pressing on the wheels and all 4 wheels exceeded this. Next stage is to turn the outside diameter on the wheels.

    On the bogie frame, fitting the frame plates to the stretcher is complete and we have started to install the fitted bolts which involves a lot of heavy work with a copper head mallet.

    Class8mikado - we do have a copy of drawing SL/BR/1678 issued in 1961 which shows that it applies to Class 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 4T, 3, 3T , 2 and 2T which looks like this

    Wheel.jpg

    It doesn't list any engine numbers that it applies to and, no, the drawing isn't dated April 1961!
     
    Sheff, Richard Roper, northernsteam и 3 другим нравится это.
  20. RAB3L

    RAB3L Member

    Дата регистрации:
    4 янв 2013
    Сообщения:
    495
    Симпатии:
    289
    Was that an attempt to cure slipping on starting or just to reduce maintenance costs? I have pleasant memories of Merchant Navies slipping on starting away from Brockenhurst in a westerly direction and having to reverse for some distance before restarting.
     

Поделиться этой страницей