If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Kent & East Sussex Railway

本贴由 martin16562017-04-10 发布. 版块名称: Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK

  1. alexl102

    alexl102 Member Friend

    注册日期:
    2019-03-01
    帖子:
    630
    支持:
    471
    性别:
    所在地:
    Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    An article in either Steam Railway or Heritage Railway said its a new blend from CPL which, with the correct firing technique, has been viewed as a decent alternative to coal in the absence of the real thing.
     
  2. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-10-07
    帖子:
    12,729
    支持:
    11,847
    职业:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    所在地:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Hunslet's are never 'run of the mill.'
     
    已获得Chris86的支持.
  3. flying scotsman123

    flying scotsman123 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2013-09-09
    帖子:
    10,674
    支持:
    18,699
    性别:
    所在地:
    Cheltenham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm not footplate crew but my understanding was that there were 2 flavours doing the rounds earlier in the year, the crushed Neath anthracite was what we had on the GWSR (and I think Bluebell Tom?) and was useless, CPL 'wildfire' (?) was trialled by I think NYMR and KWVR and seemed to receive better reviews as I recall, but there were some questions over chlorine content?
     
  4. Steve

    Steve Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-10-07
    帖子:
    12,729
    支持:
    11,847
    职业:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    所在地:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    There's an alternative low chlorine version available now which seems to be giving good results. Like all new technologies, there is a learning curve.
     
    已获得Chris86flying scotsman123的支持.
  5. D1002

    D1002 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2011-04-25
    帖子:
    9,848
    支持:
    7,548
    性别:
    所在地:
    Enfield
    We’re excited to announce that our longest & most complex restoration project – 1940’s GWR Diesel Railcar W20 – has been given a major boost with a grant of £20K from the Association for Industrial Archaeology
    This generous grant takes us closer to putting historic railcar W20 back into service in time for our 50th birthday in 2024 so that it can reprise the leading role it played at the re-opening of the railway in February 1974.
    2D729B09-90D0-4597-9DEE-86DF26E2E3D6.jpeg F8643AC5-BFBD-456D-8375-76FB2192157F.png
     
    已获得GOEdwards, brianthesnail96, Matt37401另外13人的支持.
  6. Dead Sheep

    Dead Sheep Member

    注册日期:
    2021-03-01
    帖子:
    266
    支持:
    561
    性别:
    所在地:
    Ambridge
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    An interesting news article on KMTV about the financial and volunteer challenges facing the K&ESR. 15 minutes into the video

     
    已获得johnofwessexPaul42alastair的支持.
  7. johnofwessex

    johnofwessex Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-04-06
    帖子:
    9,748
    支持:
    7,859
    性别:
    职业:
    Thorn in my managers side
    所在地:
    72
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Mr Coombs certainly looks the part as GM of a Col Stevens line

    But yes sobering viewing
     
    已获得Mark Thompson的支持.
  8. paul1609

    paul1609 New Member

    注册日期:
    2006-06-09
    帖子:
    67
    支持:
    111
    性别:
    所在地:
    Wittersham, Isle of Oxney
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    已获得Hando, Wenlock, Biermeister另外1人的支持.
  9. Mark Thompson

    Mark Thompson Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2017-09-10
    帖子:
    1,591
    支持:
    3,934
    性别:
    所在地:
    E sussex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  10. Paul.Uni

    Paul.Uni Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2008-08-28
    帖子:
    1,418
    支持:
    648
    I see from the loco roster that for the Santas, Northiam is joined by visiting locos Swiftsure, Sapper & Jessie.

    Post Christmas trains are Swiftsure & Sapper.
     
    已获得Paul42Wenlock的支持.
  11. Paul42

    Paul42 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-07-17
    帖子:
    6,096
    支持:
    4,476
    性别:
    所在地:
    East Grinstead
    Screenshot_20221203-132615.png
     
    已获得ilvaporistaalexl102Bluenosejohn的支持.
  12. Wenlock

    Wenlock Well-Known Member Friend

    注册日期:
    2008-10-26
    帖子:
    2,114
    支持:
    1,368
    性别:
    职业:
    Bus Driver
    所在地:
    Loughton Essex
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I believe the service pattern requires three of those four Hunslets to be in use on each day.

    First service runs top&tailed Tenterden to Northiam.

    One loco then drops off there and works second service back to Tenterden.
    Loco off second service remains at Northiam to work return of third train etc.

    This provides ample time at Northiam for taking water, and presumably avoids the watering at Rolvenden which delays the usual public services on the up.
     
  13. ruddingtonrsh56

    ruddingtonrsh56 Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2009-09-14
    帖子:
    1,184
    支持:
    1,814
    性别:
    所在地:
    Nottinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    What's the story behind the naming history that means Northiam was once named Sapper, but there's then another Sapper - did one replace the other, or were two locos of the same class in in two different locations coincidentally named the same thing?
     
  14. Chris86

    Chris86 Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2011-10-31
    帖子:
    1,575
    支持:
    1,783
    职业:
    Safety, technical and vehicle trainer
    所在地:
    South Yorkshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Proper industrial magic there- thats almost a gala!

    Chris
     
  15. Miff

    Miff Part of the furniture Friend

    注册日期:
    2008-06-17
    帖子:
    3,000
    支持:
    3,023
    Both are ex-army Austerities and Sapper is a name, associated with the Royal Engineers, which has been carried by a number of Army locos at different times.

    3163 was called Sapper only for a short time before being sold by the Army in ‘62. It was called Joseph by the time it was withdrawn by the NCB at Bold Colliery in the 80s.

    3797 was called Sapper from ‘65 to ‘79 when it was sold by the Army. It had arrived at KESR in ‘77 with the nameplates still fitted but, before completion of the sale, the Army wanted them back.
     
    Last edited: 2022-12-04
    已获得Paul42ruddingtonrsh56Wenlock的支持.
  16. WesternRegionHampshireman

    WesternRegionHampshireman Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2021-09-25
    帖子:
    1,188
    支持:
    222
    性别:
    所在地:
    Hampshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I hate to sound like a party pooper but I do notice everyone is making such a massive hubbub about these 0-6-0st industrials and yet, when 4144 visited the railway, nobody gave a damn, it was barely used and quite frankly, ignored most of the time.

    If this is the attitude [typical SR] then what is the point of having 1638, 4253, 5668 and 6619?
    Surely they could go to a GWR railway where they will be appreciated more.
     
  17. Ben Jenden

    Ben Jenden Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2019-05-27
    帖子:
    1,166
    支持:
    911
    性别:
    所在地:
    Croydon
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    They were appreciated enough to keep the trains running. I'm sure when 1638s bottom end repairs are complete. It will be appreciated a lot more. 4253 will also mean that 25 and 30065 can have a rest in between service life. So much more to a railways locomotive strategy than that. And given 4144 was a hire-in, it has hire fees and possibly a limited amount of days in service so it makes sense to only use it when required.

    I'm not sure of the comparison on the ins and outs but Austerities seem to be a cheap robust option to run in comparison to something else
     
    已获得green fiveghost的支持.
  18. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-09-27
    帖子:
    5,294
    支持:
    3,599
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Didn't 4144 last visit the KESR in 2020? Wasn't that the year of Covid lockdowns? A lot of railways saw traffic figures down that year, so a reluctance to use the loco and incur hire charges is perhaps not so surprising. As for an SR bias? The KESR have chosen to build a GWR fleet so I think it is safe to assume that they do like them.

    Note to OP - engage brain before posting juvenile drivel!
     
    已获得ykin01, Matt37401, green five另外11人的支持.
  19. Paul Grant

    Paul Grant Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2010-10-06
    帖子:
    1,524
    支持:
    1,120
    所在地:
    Fife
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Col. Stephens would absolutely have bought job lots of Austerities if he was around for their demobbing. Like you say, they're robust and have worked KESR trains for years with little complaint about their abilities. And crews will be passed on them so they're easier to bring into service. And the less said about the ignored user's dogmatic, juvenile posting the better.
     
    已获得Hando, green five, Dan Hill另外2人的支持.
  20. Ben Jenden

    Ben Jenden Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2019-05-27
    帖子:
    1,166
    支持:
    911
    性别:
    所在地:
    Croydon
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It made a further visit in November 2021-September 2022
     

分享此页面