If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

West Somerset Railway General Discussion

Dieses Thema im Forum 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK' wurde von gwr4090 gestartet, 15 November 2007.

  1. JBTEvans

    JBTEvans Part of the furniture

    Registriert seit:
    14 Februar 2008
    Beiträge:
    2.597
    Zustimmungen:
    793
    Geschlecht:
    männlich
    Ort:
    Casnewydd, De Cymru
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    If carriages are in sheds, they are out of sight and out of mind. Next to nobody is going to try and break into a shed and set fire to a carriage.
     
    The Dainton Banker gefällt dies.
  2. Paulthehitch

    Paulthehitch Well-Known Member

    Registriert seit:
    13 Februar 2020
    Beiträge:
    1.090
    Zustimmungen:
    1.093
    Geschlecht:
    männlich
    Ort:
    Hayling Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    On the absolute contrary they cannot afford not to to have such things
     
    The Dainton Banker und ghost gefällt dies.
  3. bishdunster

    bishdunster New Member

    Registriert seit:
    27 September 2015
    Beiträge:
    154
    Zustimmungen:
    111
    Geschlecht:
    männlich
    Beruf:
    Retired, but still far too busy !
    Ort:
    dunster somerset
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I dare say there are several more throughout Britain !
     
  4. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Registriert seit:
    27 September 2006
    Beiträge:
    5.294
    Zustimmungen:
    3.599
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    For once, I'm in agreement!

    Must admit, when I saw your name but before I read the comment I was expecting it to be in response to this one:

    At Blue Anchor the pub is teetering on the edge and not far down the road is the WSR. With global warming and the consequent rise in sea levels the railway may be either getting some more stone traffic in the future or a foreshortened line that ends at Watchet!

    giving your wholehearted support to the idea!
     
    ghost und Jamessquared gefällt dies.
  5. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Registriert seit:
    27 September 2006
    Beiträge:
    5.294
    Zustimmungen:
    3.599
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Like I said on that thread, a measured and appropriate response. Not everyone has a sarcasm detector though.......
     
  6. Alan Kebby

    Alan Kebby Well-Known Member

    Registriert seit:
    18 September 2019
    Beiträge:
    1.192
    Zustimmungen:
    1.249
    Geschlecht:
    männlich
    Ort:
    Brighton
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Indeed they don’t.
     
  7. D1039

    D1039 Guest

    I would have thought that heritage carriage sheds would be fitted with fire detection too
     
    The Dainton Banker, ghost und Paulthehitch gefällt dies.
  8. richards

    richards Part of the furniture

    Registriert seit:
    1 Oktober 2008
    Beiträge:
    4.708
    Zustimmungen:
    2.083
    Geschlecht:
    männlich
    Ort:
    London
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    An idealist approach which doesn't really work in real life. How many preserved railways have secure covered accommodation for even *part* of their carriage fleet?
     
  9. Paulthehitch

    Paulthehitch Well-Known Member

    Registriert seit:
    13 Februar 2020
    Beiträge:
    1.090
    Zustimmungen:
    1.093
    Geschlecht:
    männlich
    Ort:
    Hayling Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Quite a few but not nearly enough particularly as many have been around for years.
     
  10. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Registriert seit:
    8 Dezember 2014
    Beiträge:
    19.263
    Zustimmungen:
    12.514
    Geschlecht:
    männlich
    Ort:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    OK, in your perfect world maybe, but there are problems
    1 land to build a shed on, not every railway has the land, unless they can buy an field next to the railway,
    2 money, if your only just breaking even, struggling to survive, then its a luxury you can't afford,
    3 location, even a secure shed if its in the middle of nowhere, can be a target to vandals and thieves, even well located railway workshops often with houses near by get broken into, and have items stolen, even with very good alarm systems, you can't have a human presence 24/7
     
    richards gefällt dies.
  11. martin1656

    martin1656 Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Registriert seit:
    8 Dezember 2014
    Beiträge:
    19.263
    Zustimmungen:
    12.514
    Geschlecht:
    männlich
    Ort:
    St Leonards
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Don't you believe it, have you not heard of targeted thefts, copper brass fittings, scrap metal thieves have been known to case places to see whats laying around, and then at a later date, pull up in a transit and help themselves, even wire fences don't stop them
     
  12. goldfish

    goldfish Nat Pres stalwart

    Registriert seit:
    13 Januar 2009
    Beiträge:
    16.157
    Zustimmungen:
    14.426
    I think @Paulthehitch recognises the strategic error the Bluebell and Watercress Line made in selecting space-limited rural backwaters like Sheffield Park, Ropley or Alresford to start their lines, when they should have picked somewhere with room to develop significant covered carriage storage and restoration capacity like Nine Elms…

    ;)

    Simon
     
  13. Paulthehitch

    Paulthehitch Well-Known Member

    Registriert seit:
    13 Februar 2020
    Beiträge:
    1.090
    Zustimmungen:
    1.093
    Geschlecht:
    männlich
    Ort:
    Hayling Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    That's rather OTT but land assembly opportunities were clearly desirable.
     
  14. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Registriert seit:
    27 September 2006
    Beiträge:
    5.294
    Zustimmungen:
    3.599
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Hindsight is a wonderful thing!
     
  15. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Registriert seit:
    27 September 2006
    Beiträge:
    5.294
    Zustimmungen:
    3.599
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    In the Hitchian world perhaps all of our heritage railways
    Mine works OK, I think, but wasn't triggered by the post I was alluding to!
     
  16. goldfish

    goldfish Nat Pres stalwart

    Registriert seit:
    13 Januar 2009
    Beiträge:
    16.157
    Zustimmungen:
    14.426
    It wasn't intended entirely seriously… :)

    I do find it highly implausible that anyone could realistically anticipate what eg the Bluebell or Watercress Lines have become from their extremely humble beginnings. Hindsight tells us that land would have been desirable, but a two carriage service on the Bluebell would never have required the infrastructure provision they've achieved over the years. Even the prospect of a viable tourist attraction would have seemed pretty laughable at the time.

    It would have likely prevented them achieving anything at all had their starting point been 'we need space for covered storage for 20-30 carriages and sufficient engineering facilities to undertake major restoration of a fleet of 30 steam engines, and some diesels'.

    Simon
     
    Paul42 gefällt dies.
  17. jamesd

    jamesd Member

    Registriert seit:
    24 August 2009
    Beiträge:
    641
    Zustimmungen:
    354
    Ort:
    S Wales
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    What Paul is saying is right, undercover storage should have been prioritised much higher than it has been on a number of railways. We know the reasons why it hasn't been and they are perfectly understandable but that doesn't mean the lack of prioritisation was right.
     
    The Dainton Banker, Matt78, ghost und 2 anderen gefällt dies.
  18. 61624

    61624 Part of the furniture

    Registriert seit:
    27 September 2006
    Beiträge:
    5.294
    Zustimmungen:
    3.599
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I'm
    I'm not sure that I accept this comment - how many railways have space for carriage sheds and yet have not built them - the GWSR and the GCR, perhaps, but then one has to question what could or should have been pushed down the priorities list. For most lines, a meaningful carriage shed is a substantial proposition in terms of cash that would have had to be found.
     
    Matt37401 gefällt dies.
  19. 21B

    21B Part of the furniture

    Registriert seit:
    2 September 2009
    Beiträge:
    3.893
    Zustimmungen:
    8.639
    All Paul is really saying is that a carriage shed should be high on the strategic priority list of any railway. I think that is a reasonable observation and one which has been obvious for several decades. Whether it was realisable or not depends on many variables at each railway. It doesn’t change the basic premise.
     
  20. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Registriert seit:
    8 März 2008
    Beiträge:
    27.793
    Zustimmungen:
    64.457
    Ort:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Heritage lines are nearly always under resourced financially; that makes big investments with long pay off periods difficult. Even if land is available, was capital available at the same time? Just saying that assembling land was desirable doesn't automatically mean it was also possible.

    The finances of carriage sheds are I think complex. Which is not to say I don't think they should be built, just that justifying them just on cost grounds is not necessarily straight forward. Firstly there is the land use: a carriage shed that stores n vehicles will take up more space than a siding that houses the same number. Then you have the capital expense of the building, which depreciates on your balance sheet. If you have a £500k building with a fifty year lifespan, you lose £10k per year in capital depreciation; if you use it to store out-of-use vehicles that have essentially zero balance sheet value, you make nothing in the balance sheet terms about preserving those vehicles for future use. You might of course save thousands of pounds in future restoration costs, but they don't show up in the profit and loss account. Of course, if you use the shed for storing in-traffic vehicles, you might make a more justifiable saving, but it would have to be in terms of things like needing to revarnish a vehicle once every five years rather than once every three etc.

    There's also the operating cost of the building (lighting etc, with attendant electricity costs). Even things like fire alarms and burglar alarms have annual maintenance costs. And I was having an interesting conversation the other day with one of our directors about the issues of safe access to roof spaces for maintenance, given the current attention given to working at height regulations.

    In other words - there are costs and other management overhead in erecting buildings. I think such facilities are necessary, but it is at least important to realise that erecting them crystallises genuine costs immediately, in exchange for rather more amorphous future savings. And, inevitably, there is the question of priorities: if you are a railway with neither covered workshops nor covered carriage sheds, it is hard to prioritise the carriage shed over the workshop. It's notable that those lines that now have significant covered storage for carriages have initially invested in maintenance facilities first; something that the WSR doesn't seem over-endowed with relative to the scale of its operation.

    Tom
     
    MellishR, Fish Plate, Steve und 4 anderen gefällt dies.

Die Seite empfehlen