Heritage Railway Governance

D7076 · 15 Mar 2023

35B a spus: ↑

The question that makes me curious is what difference this has made to the overall sustainability of NYMR as an organisation. It is clear (a) that grant givers have responded to conservation being a purpose and (b) that this has led to valuable income and (c) that a worthwhile project has resulted. What I can't tell from afar is whether this has made existing work happen better and in a better funded way, or whether it is effectively new money for new activity, or somewhere in the middle.

The relevance to this thread is not so much the specific answer - that will depend on some very specific facts and circumstances - but the wider implications for governance. If this is at the "existing work" end of the spectrum, then it raises questions about whether the governance is actually focusing on the heritage railway at the core of the operation, or would actually be a diversification, adding workload but without meaningfully contributing to the underlying operation.

That then comes back to the question of the purpose that the governance serves, and whether changes adequately represent the views and needs of the supporter base of the railway.

And then, coming back full circle, that then raises the important question of how members/shareholders can exercise their rights as part of holding that board to account if the effect of their policies is to the detriment of what those members/shareholders judge to be the primary purpose of the organisation (always assuming that they are working within it's legal purposes).
Click to expand...

I’m sure the long list letter of begging projects will still be included in the envelope with the next Moors Line ….as with all previous magazines …

Autentificare sau Înregistrare

Heritage Railway Governance

D7076 Well-Known Member

Distribuie pagina asta

Autentificare sau Înregistrare

Heritage Railway Governance

D7076 Well-Known Member

Distribuie pagina asta

Căutări utile