If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Steam Dreams 2023

本贴由 Sam 601032022-11-16 发布. 版块名称: What's Going On

  1. evilswans

    evilswans Member

    注册日期:
    2007-12-18
    帖子:
    349
    支持:
    203
    所在地:
    Woking, Surrey
    70000 seen being dragged back into Guildford, motion missing from the left hand side, do hope everyone got home from a long evening

    all the best
    Matt

     
    已获得leanderOswald T Wistle的支持.
  2. AaronT

    AaronT Member

    注册日期:
    2021-09-05
    帖子:
    285
    支持:
    109
    性别:
    所在地:
    Hampshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Sorry what I meant was separate from the tour. Do we know if something came from Southall to collect it or if it was left somewhere?
     
  3. Deepgreen

    Deepgreen Well-Known Member Friend

    注册日期:
    2010-07-30
    帖子:
    2,099
    支持:
    1,403
    性别:
    职业:
    Early retirement! (Ex-Business Improvement, LU).
    所在地:
    Gomshall, Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    An armchair view (!) - the diesel could have taken the coaches back to Guildford and left them there, run round and gone back to collect 70000, then re-attached it to the train which could then have run either ECS or with any remaining passengers back to London. At that time of night it must have been possible to have a platform occupied without significant disruption. As it was, the train, presumably with passengers still aboard, arrived at Vic at 0240ish! Even if the diesel had not accompanied the train, it, or one from, say, Tonbridge could have been summoned to the rescue easily in the time it took. Credit to LSL for what sounds like a good PR exercise on board.
     
  4. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-10-02
    帖子:
    7,923
    支持:
    6,656
    性别:
    所在地:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    That assumes that GBRF just happen to have a driver with route knowledge just sitting around doing nothing. I would imagine that is rather unlikely at that time of day on the modern railway. I understand NR have the ability to "sequestrate" locos from any TOC/FOC to recover failed trains disrupting the network, so I must assume that was not an option.
    May have been a few LGW passengers missing flights last evening I suspect.
     
    已获得Johnb的支持.
  5. alastair

    alastair Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2005-11-07
    帖子:
    1,272
    支持:
    788
    Good point re. assistance locos. Fortunately it looks like nothing was actually stuck behind the failed train i.e LGW trains would have been terminated at Guildford. People would have been sent via Clapham Jn without too much hassle. From personal experience I would never take the NDL to catch a flight at Gatwick without including at least one extra hour just in case!
     
  6. Deepgreen

    Deepgreen Well-Known Member Friend

    注册日期:
    2010-07-30
    帖子:
    2,099
    支持:
    1,403
    性别:
    职业:
    Early retirement! (Ex-Business Improvement, LU).
    所在地:
    Gomshall, Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes, the rescue loco would have been a long shot, but if the 47 had been left at Battersea it could have done it. BTW I wasn't suggesting it should have been, just responding to a point about the 47.

    One Gatwick train was trapped for a while but reversed at Shalford. It would need much more than one extra hour allowed for the diversion to catch a flight!
     
  7. alastair

    alastair Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2005-11-07
    帖子:
    1,272
    支持:
    788
    If you mean travelling via Clapham Jn, not really. Guildford/Gatwick direct 45m, via CJ anything from 1hr 13m to 1hr 34m depending on connections. I was just responding to an earlier post on how LGW passengers might have missed flights.
     
  8. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-10-02
    帖子:
    7,923
    支持:
    6,656
    性别:
    所在地:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I think you have lost me there, how would that have helped?
     
  9. 2857Harry

    2857Harry Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2023-06-05
    帖子:
    1,209
    支持:
    2,489
    性别:
    职业:
    Conductor/Guard
    所在地:
    Kidderminster/Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Just as a bit more info for those wondering about the ifs and buts - There was info given out late in to the evening that due to a lack of Mobile Ops Manager (MOM) being available splitting the Brit off the train was not possible. The whole consist had to move. From decision time regarding the rods coming off, to moving was a little under 2 hours which I have to admit is a cracking effort with the weight, complexity and so on.

    In terms of the customer service aspect I’ve had chance to think over it all again this morning and I wouldn’t change my mind from the 10/10 verdict I gave yesterday. Our tables £96 bar bill was covered on the house, and I’ve been informed that the subsequent taxi return to our hotel and unusable train tickets will be covered as well.
     
    已获得Oswald T Wistle, staffordian, Mick45305另外7人的支持.
  10. green five

    green five Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2006-04-30
    帖子:
    6,783
    支持:
    2,623
    性别:
    职业:
    Design Draughtsman
    所在地:
    Hampshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The failure was captured on video at Chilworth (below). It happened after 70000 had passed through Chilworth Station and just beyond the road overbridge at the Redhill end of the station, just before the bend where the line heads in to a deep cutting. Not a great location to have to stop or to consider leaving a failed loco:

     
    Last edited: 2023-08-24
    已获得WaterbuckleanderOswald T Wistle的支持.
  11. Deepgreen

    Deepgreen Well-Known Member Friend

    注册日期:
    2010-07-30
    帖子:
    2,099
    支持:
    1,403
    性别:
    职业:
    Early retirement! (Ex-Business Improvement, LU).
    所在地:
    Gomshall, Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I was just saying that IF the 47 had been left behind (as some would prefer), it could have travelled down in time to assist, but having it with the train was obviously a vast help here.
     
  12. Deepgreen

    Deepgreen Well-Known Member Friend

    注册日期:
    2010-07-30
    帖子:
    2,099
    支持:
    1,403
    性别:
    职业:
    Early retirement! (Ex-Business Improvement, LU).
    所在地:
    Gomshall, Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes, the abrupt stop can just about be made out right at the end. I wonder what the failure felt/sounded like on the footplate. I nearly went to that bridge to film yesterday, but opted for Worplesdon instead!
     
  13. Big Al

    Big Al Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator

    注册日期:
    2009-05-30
    帖子:
    22,591
    支持:
    22,721
    所在地:
    1016
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I think we should take it as read that when anything unexpected happens when on the footplate it's a stressful moment when everything you should know about all manner of situations kicks in and it's then a safety first response. Not nice until everything stops and is (relatively) quiet.
     
  14. Romsey

    Romsey Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2007-07-14
    帖子:
    3,868
    支持:
    1,849
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired SPM
    所在地:
    Close to Spike Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    35028 is restricted through the DSL platform and the "S" bend at the London end.
    Without checking historic notices I think other locos are restricted as well.

    Cheers, Neil
     
  15. Southern Gricer

    Southern Gricer New Member

    注册日期:
    2013-04-28
    帖子:
    83
    支持:
    81
    性别:
    职业:
    Radio consultant, broadcaster and tutor
    所在地:
    Redhill, Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    已获得AaronT的支持.
  16. AaronT

    AaronT Member

    注册日期:
    2021-09-05
    帖子:
    285
    支持:
    109
    性别:
    所在地:
    Hampshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
  17. Ben Jenden

    Ben Jenden Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2019-05-27
    帖子:
    1,166
    支持:
    911
    性别:
    所在地:
    Croydon
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Image surfaced on social media of its crosshead snapped in half...
     
  18. Deepgreen

    Deepgreen Well-Known Member Friend

    注册日期:
    2010-07-30
    帖子:
    2,099
    支持:
    1,403
    性别:
    职业:
    Early retirement! (Ex-Business Improvement, LU).
    所在地:
    Gomshall, Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Indeed, but the whole of the Surrey hills section will be in darkness as this run is even later than usual. 61306 looks most likely I suppose.
     
  19. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2006-01-14
    帖子:
    8,863
    支持:
    9,270
    性别:
    职业:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    所在地:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    FB_IMG_1692830347811.jpg

    Oof...

    Hopefully that's not done any other damage. Not the first time the Brit has had to limp home on one cylinder though - it had a hot bearing on its mainline test run in 1991 and had to have some of the motion removed.
     
    已获得Spinnerleander的支持.
  20. Ben Jenden

    Ben Jenden Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2019-05-27
    帖子:
    1,166
    支持:
    911
    性别:
    所在地:
    Croydon
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Now says 61306 on the website in the updates section for next week's charter
     

分享此页面