If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Bluebell Railway General Discussion

Тема в разделе 'Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK', создана пользователем Jamessquared, 16 фев 2013.

  1. D7076

    D7076 Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    21 дек 2007
    Сообщения:
    1.538
    Симпатии:
    691
    That’s the end of steam then …chance of burns ,scolds ,too many hot surfaces ,chance of running someone over at a crossing ….crew falling from a running board ….and that nasty hot fire too close to the cab ….
     
  2. Bikermike

    Bikermike Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    11 мар 2020
    Сообщения:
    1.814
    Симпатии:
    2.045
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Thameslink territory
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The joys of survivorship bias.

    It's all fun and games until someone loses a bollock.

    Perhaps you could go and comfort my late grandad who saw his friend crushed to death in a shunting accident...

    By the way, I'm a Manx Grand Prix marshal, so don't think I'm risk-averse, but we reduce the risk in every sane way we can.

    Remember, at one stage the continuous brake on passenger stock was considered a needless expense.
     
  3. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    14 янв 2006
    Сообщения:
    8.862
    Симпатии:
    9.255
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    Адрес:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's GWR tanks that are the biggest problem. The top lamp bracket is recessed and there's no real place to put your feet while putting the lamp up there. If you look at other locos there are flanges around the bottom of the bunker or steps for your feet. Even in BR days some drivers didn't bother putting the lamp up on the top bracket, not worth the risk. Ergonomics was a word that completely bypassed the GWR!
     
    johnofwessex нравится это.
  4. andrewtoplis

    andrewtoplis Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    28 мар 2006
    Сообщения:
    1.419
    Симпатии:
    878
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Honestly I almost didn't post that comment as I was expecting a load of "in my day" responses rather than trying to engage. Seems people would rather have a whinge than a discussion.
     
    Chris86 и Hunslet589 нравится это.
  5. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    3 дек 2014
    Сообщения:
    15.536
    Симпатии:
    18.382
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Адрес:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    They didn’t even think it was worth the effort to fit cab doors to tender engines. I don’t like climbing up onto the back of a Stanier tender using those inadequate steps and a couple of handrails that never seem to be in the right place, at least Bulleid Pacific tenders have proper ladders. The blower valve on LMS is located over the firehole door so in the event of a blowback the only alternative to putting your hand in the flames is to whack it with the shovel, not ideal. As you say the science of ergonomics wasn’t that well developed in the 30s
     
  6. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    18 июн 2011
    Сообщения:
    28.729
    Симпатии:
    28.654
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The key word is “sane”. @andrewtoplis outlines something well intentioned but which too easily throws out baby with bathwater because of how it’s framed. With very slight adjustment, it becomes something we should all welcome.

    As for top lamps, I both agree with those who suggest it’s appropriate to derisk, and those who fear the thin end of the wedge. In both cases, the question of “why are we doing this” is central, and the justification of “preservation” dangerously open to challenge.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  7. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    17 июл 2007
    Сообщения:
    4.906
    Симпатии:
    7.651
    The top bracket on an A4 is pretty hard to get at too. That's why headboards are usually placed on the lower middle bracket rather than up top.

    Peter
     
  8. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    2 окт 2015
    Сообщения:
    7.914
    Симпатии:
    6.646
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    No it is the premise that the first question is "do we need to do it, not "how can we make it safer". On a macro level the answer to do we need to do it i.e. have a heritage railway in the first place is no. Because whilst it brings extreme pleasure to many both volunteers and public, it is a leisure industry and therefore not essential.
     
  9. Hunslet589

    Hunslet589 New Member

    Дата регистрации:
    19 мар 2017
    Сообщения:
    126
    Симпатии:
    220
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Oxfordshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Not really.... Swindon started a seemingly low priority program in the mid 30s of moving the top lamp iron from the top of the smokebox to one welded to the upper part of the smokebox door itself - for precisely this reason. It was never universally applied but is a useful point when trying to date photos.

    They did think of such things - just not something that was considered important. It was a different time...
     
  10. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    3 дек 2014
    Сообщения:
    15.536
    Симпатии:
    18.382
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Адрес:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I agree, I mentioned climbing up onto the top of a Stanier tender, in practice I don’t think it’s done now using the steps unless there is no other way. The problem is applying modern H&S to old technology
     
  11. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    16 апр 2009
    Сообщения:
    8.911
    Симпатии:
    5.847
    The risk of falling when putting a lamp on a top bracket can be avoided entirely by not using that bracket. Whether that is the right solution may be a matter of opinion. The risk of falling while manhandling the hose(?) of a water crane into the hole in a tender is probably somewhat greater, but cannot be avoided entirely, so how is it minimised?
     
  12. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    8 мар 2008
    Сообщения:
    27.788
    Симпатии:
    64.440
    Адрес:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    You could minimise that risk - low level water fillers with fire hose attachments; and do the watering from a high pressure hose supply away from a platform. (Many main line locos are set up that way since - in the absence of water cranes - it is a way to get water from a fire truck, particualrly if you at times need to take water under overhead wires). You'd lose a lot of the theatre that makes a heritage railway more than just a train ride. A former loco director wanted to go along that route for tender locos.

    Tom
     
    Chris86 и Matt78 нравится это.
  13. andrewtoplis

    andrewtoplis Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    28 мар 2006
    Сообщения:
    1.419
    Симпатии:
    878
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    This is reducing the whole world to necessary or unnecessary. Should we stop cooking food as we could all eat cold? No, it's daft. The approach I outlined above is how you facilitate activities with risk being carried out safely, which begins with the very fair question "should we do it at all"? The answer may well be yes, in which case you would say " how can we do it as little as absolutely necessary"? and work that through. From there you might say "what could we do to give any additional protection?", which might give you some options like a safety harness if you were working at height. If that doesn't fix it, or isn't practical, you would look at things like training for the staff and PPE. By the time you get to the end point you will have reduced the risk to As Low As Reasonably Practicable which is what the law requires of safety risk. The activity can, therefore, carry on in a much better manner than without this process.

    Back to the headcode example, what this achieves is reducing the frequency of working at height, it doesn't ban it if you wanted that particular code for a charter or some occasion when it was important. Assessment of risk is about Likelihood and Severity, if you reduce the frequency of a task being carried out you reduce the likelihood of injury.

    Ultimately this is all about allowing things to continue, not getting rid of them.

    Andy (27 years on heritage steam and looking forward to another 27).
     
    Chris86 и dan.lank нравится это.
  14. The Gricing Owl

    The Gricing Owl Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    29 сен 2023
    Сообщения:
    1.035
    Симпатии:
    1.960
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Owl and SR steam gricer
    Адрес:
    Near steam Man of Kent and Golden Arrow route
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's looking rather good at the Buebell tomorrow. 31065, 73082 and 80151 hopefully in use.

    https://www.bluebell-railway.co.uk/bluebell/pti/index.html

    Especially interesting to me is the BR Standard five on the Pullman train, I really hope it stays that way.

    Not the Golden Arrow, but I did have a run on the up working of the all Pullman Bournemouth Belle behind a Standard 5 once. It would be great to get a photo of 73082 on a Pullman train to go with that log, that I timed on Sunday 4 December 1966.

    On that day, John 'Boy' Gaffney aka the 'New Cross Lip', one of the really fast lower link drivers (100 mph with Lapford later on in 1967), and a great guy as well, took 73020 down to Bournemouth on the 11.30 ex Waterloo. And both him and his fireman, Ryecroft, were booked back on the Belle, with, I think the same loco.

    73020 did ok on the lightly loaded 11.30, but Gaffney wanted something a bit stronger to have good run back on the Belle. I'm not sure how the conversation went in Bournemouth loco shed, but being young and with the New Cross Lip nickname I doubt it went down well with the shed foreman and certainly couldn't have been printed here! So him and his fireman appeared with 73022, far from in the best condition, for the up Belle of over 450 tons behind the tender. For a Bournmouth crew in that position at Bournemouth no doubt the shed foreman would havc said something along the lines of, "I've just checked round the back and found a fully coaled, watered and ready to go Merchant Navy" you can have. Especially as there were a couple of Bournemouth crews (amongst some very good drivers), who I am sure would have refused point blank to have taken a knackered class 5 on a train usually booked for a class 8.

    The crew of Gaffney and Ryecroft did the best they could. A decent run to the water stop at Southampton. But the almost mandatory signal check near Eastleigh where the long climb to Roundwood starts saw a recovery to the mid 40s, but with steam presure falling it needed full regulator and 45 to 50% cut off most of the way up the climb to eventually get over the top of the bank at 37 mph. Running after that was mid to high 60s, with a number of signal checks - I didn't ask at Waterloo (12 minutes lost on schedule, mostly due to all the signal checks) but I suspect care was being taken after we got over Roundwood to avoid a prolonged water stop, as the consumption must have been quite high.

    Oops, story time over. Back to the Bluebell, I hope 73082 is ok for the GA tomorrow and that Horsted Keynes buffet is open for coffee and snacks.

    Bryan B
     
    green five нравится это.
  15. 35B

    35B Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    18 июн 2011
    Сообщения:
    28.729
    Симпатии:
    28.654
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Grantham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    But the framing is the problem, because it elevates necessity to be the dominant decision factor.

    There are other ways to get to ALARP that do not elevate necessity in this way. That needs to consider the hazard, the mitigation(s) and the importance of the activity, to work out the trade-off.

    In the heritage sector especially, I think this is important - because overwrought though some of the examples are, they are the reductio ad not particularly absurdam of this particular framing.
     
    21B нравится это.
  16. Cuckoo Line

    Cuckoo Line Member

    Дата регистрации:
    29 авг 2020
    Сообщения:
    373
    Симпатии:
    382
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    South West
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Real life has changed, in the old days you didn't have the same independent investigation if someone got seriously hurt/killed. In the old days people didn't sue for damages. You only have to look when there is a serious road accident, roads are mow closed for hours to do an investigation etc. It didn't usually make the national press if someone was killed in a road accident. Accidents now usually make the national press = bad publicity. I also don't think most people are generally as responsible as they were, or use common sense as much, hence it leads to more regulation etc. It's not rocket science either to apply sensible H&S rules. We live in a different world. Sensible H&S shouldn't mean the end of heritage.
    And yes I am old enough to remember steam trains on the Cuckoo Line !
    Sent from my SM-A556B using Tapatalk
     
    Last edited: 28 сен 2024
  17. ady

    ady Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    4 июл 2006
    Сообщения:
    2.375
    Симпатии:
    285
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Post office
    Адрес:
    South
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Cuckoo Line и The Gricing Owl нравится это.
  18. mikechant

    mikechant Member

    Дата регистрации:
    24 окт 2012
    Сообщения:
    225
    Симпатии:
    243
    I think that "non-essential" argument is dubious anyhow. The "non-essential" parts of the economy - the entire leisure, entertainment and tourism industry for a start, plus a very large proportion of "unnecessary" consumer goods (fast fashion, many gadgets, luxury foods) - are big enough in total that if they were removed overnight, the economy would collapse and there would be no money for "essential" services. So you could argue that the "non-essential" parts of the economy are in fact just as essential as the "essential" parts! :)
     
    RLinkinS, MellishR и 35B нравится это.
  19. 21B

    21B Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    2 сен 2009
    Сообщения:
    3.889
    Симпатии:
    8.630
    I agree. The key words of ALARP are the last two. reasonably practicable. The problem with reframing everything to “should we do it at all” is that the test becomes very simply can we avoid doing it? And the obvious very far end of that line of thought is that we could simply avoid running a heritage railway at all.

    Since that might reasonably be seen to be taking things too far, the question is where is the reasonable point? That is very much harder to define, but if we accept that running a heritage railway is an acceptable form of “necessary “ then I think it should surely follow that the purpose of such is to preserve elements of the way things looked in period. Whether lamps should still go on top brackets or not is then a matter for individual duty holders, but my feeling is that they probably should, but specific thought be put into HOW and training provided for that “how”.

    In the example of the GW tank engine, personally I open the doors on the cab sheet if possible and reach over the coal.
     
    MellishR нравится это.
  20. The Gricing Owl

    The Gricing Owl Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    29 сен 2023
    Сообщения:
    1.035
    Симпатии:
    1.960
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Owl and SR steam gricer
    Адрес:
    Near steam Man of Kent and Golden Arrow route
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Another very pleasant day at the Bluebell today. Except for going to the old West Hoathly station for the last return run by 80151 I spent all day at Horsted Keynes, which is what I usually do. It can be quiet there, especially when, like this weekend there was an event (Fireman Sam) at Sheffield Park. Trains looked quite well loaded most of today, so I hope that event went well for all the young visitors and was a money earner for the Bluebell. And getting back to HK, I will mention the small cafe on platform 3 & 4, to which I made three visits during the day for coffee, with two of those visits seeing me enjoying a large sausage roll with a lot of tasty sausage meat inside!

    30165, 80151 and 73082 (Golden Arrow) were booked to be in service. Which is why I went, as I need photos of a Std 5 on a pullman train to go with my only timing log of a Std 5 on the all Pullman Bournemouth Belle: see #7214 And I also wanted to get appropriate photos of 80151 to put with my timing logs of the same class of loco on the Brockenhurst-Lymington branch. Along with those locos 31065 (aka 65) was kept busy on its scheduled workings.

    A few photos from today below.

    Bryan B

    006-31065-arr-H-Keynes-on-11.45-S-Park-29Sept-2024.jpg

    013-73082-arr-H-Keynes-on-Golden-Arrow-12.25-S-Park-29Sept-2024.jpg


    019-80151-arr-H-Keynes-on-14.05-E-Grinstead-29Sept-2024.jpg

    024-80151-W-Hoathly-on-16.45-E-Grinstead-29Sept-2024.jpg
     
    banburysaint, green five, Johnme101 и 6 другим нравится это.

Поделиться этой страницей