If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Project Wareham

本贴由 David R2015-07-31 发布. 版块名称: Heritage Railways & Centres in the UK

  1. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-10-02
    帖子:
    7,914
    支持:
    6,646
    性别:
    所在地:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I seem to remember reading that the concern was (apart from NR not wanting to do it, as they want it removed) was that someone could get trapped between the closed gates. Most level crossings have four half barriers that do not all come down at the same time, and from my viewing experience, waiting for steam tours at Feltham, are very easy to push through anyway, even for slightly built women. Add the that the crossing in the shopping centre at Poole was, and may still be, the most misused crossing in the NR Wessex zone, so I guess we have "form" down here.
     
  2. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-10-02
    帖子:
    7,914
    支持:
    6,646
    性别:
    所在地:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Perhaps the new mega council when that happens will have a different view. Or as an alternative save even more and have no trains west of Poole.:(
     
  3. Flying Phil

    Flying Phil Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2018-12-10
    帖子:
    3,018
    支持:
    6,318
    性别:
    所在地:
    Leicestershire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think there was a footbridge being proposed, which many local residents complained about, including a famous actor?
     
  4. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-10-02
    帖子:
    7,914
    支持:
    6,646
    性别:
    所在地:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes covered in both the BBC and Swanage News articles linked by @DcB above.
    The last footbridge proposal was an eyesore though.
     
  5. DcB

    DcB Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2018-06-05
    帖子:
    1,487
    支持:
    455
    所在地:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    With the latest proximity detection cameras, gate locking and software automated ground level foot crossings are more viable. Will be interesting to see what Network rail will suggest at the meeting.
    But a ramp, even if an eyesore, is still more reliable and safer than relying on software.
     
  6. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2009-04-16
    帖子:
    8,911
    支持:
    5,847
    That is a valid concern, which needs to be addressed by someone watching, and if necessary unlocking a gate to let the person out. But that could be done just as well by someone miles away with CCTV as by someone on the spot.
     
  7. Romsey

    Romsey Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2007-07-14
    帖子:
    3,868
    支持:
    1,849
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired SPM
    所在地:
    Close to Spike Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Of course there is a modern road bridge nearby which has a pavement, visible in the photo in the BBC item. It "just" needs a 200 metre path with a gentle slope to access it. No modern ramps attached to the original 1880 something footbridge.
    Now I wonder what the gradient of the standard ramped footbridge is compared to the slope up the hill to Wareham town centre? Somehow I suspect the footbridge has a shallower slope.

    Cheers, Neil
    (Sorry, I'll stop it now, making feasible suggestions and wanting facts checked!)
     
    已获得Gladiator 5076的支持.
  8. Romsey

    Romsey Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2007-07-14
    帖子:
    3,868
    支持:
    1,849
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired SPM
    所在地:
    Close to Spike Island
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
  9. Woof Mk2

    Woof Mk2 Member

    注册日期:
    2015-10-26
    帖子:
    336
    支持:
    244
    性别:
    所在地:
    Padstow
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    From experience that is not correct
     
  10. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2006-01-14
    帖子:
    8,862
    支持:
    9,255
    性别:
    职业:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    所在地:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    It's not exactly an area of outstanding natural beauty though is it? Wareham station is next to an industrial estate, there's a stonking great road bridge over the line, and just down the road there's a car garage with piles of scrap out the back.
     
    已获得johnofwessex的支持.
  11. MellishR

    MellishR Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    注册日期:
    2009-04-16
    帖子:
    8,911
    支持:
    5,847
    Can you please explain?
     
  12. Woof Mk2

    Woof Mk2 Member

    注册日期:
    2015-10-26
    帖子:
    336
    支持:
    244
    性别:
    所在地:
    Padstow
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Person on site can see from all angles whilst those watching on CCTV can only see through their cameras.
    Because those on site can see from all angles they can act quicker and their decision making process is more suitable to their surroundings
     
  13. DcB

    DcB Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2018-06-05
    帖子:
    1,487
    支持:
    455
    所在地:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    From the reports online NR are looking into AI for multiple cameras on crossings which can detect people and alert a remote signal man. Ring cameras can do some thing similar.

    But NR's preference still seems to be ramps on the footbridge.
    The path on the flyover was discussed somewhere, perhaps on this forum?.
    The petition seems confused
    https://www.change.org/p/save-wareham-s-ground-level-pedestrian-railway-crossing?signed=true
    "Any attempt to close it and replace it with a ramped bridge or pavement on the fly-over next to the main A351 Poole-Wareham road would add significantly to a journey between the north and south sides of the town up a steep grdient.

    But does not mention the ramp up to the existing footbridge , which although an "eyesore" might be a gentler slope.
     
    Last edited: 2025-02-16
  14. Woof Mk2

    Woof Mk2 Member

    注册日期:
    2015-10-26
    帖子:
    336
    支持:
    244
    性别:
    所在地:
    Padstow
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    No point in NR spending any money as the lease expires in 13 years, Dorset Council have to pay for gate keepers and when lease expires it will be closed.
    Thats the worse case scenario
     
  15. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-10-02
    帖子:
    7,914
    支持:
    6,646
    性别:
    所在地:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    This has an artists impression of the ramp, not sure the gradient would be less than the bridge from the Wareham side. However the climb up from the side the buses stop to the road bridge is steep.
    https://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/2...itted-finding-solution-wareham-rail-crossing/

    As these council minutes are only last November I guess the council have had another change of heart hence the email on Friday.

    https://moderngov.dorsetcouncil.gov...ossing+Cabinet+Report+including+App+1+2+4.pdf
     
  16. Dunfanaghy Road

    Dunfanaghy Road Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2019-10-09
    帖子:
    1,401
    支持:
    1,772
    性别:
    职业:
    Retired
    所在地:
    Alton, Hants
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think that the current Council are angling to 'gift' the new Council an expensive fait accompli.
    Pat
     
  17. DcB

    DcB Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2018-06-05
    帖子:
    1,487
    支持:
    455
    所在地:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    There is another less steep artists impression from the BBC website.
    [​IMG]
    So the Council consultations agree on a ramped solution, even though another part of the Council disagree
     
  18. Dan Bennett

    Dan Bennett Member

    注册日期:
    2006-03-25
    帖子:
    487
    支持:
    110
    性别:
    职业:
    South Western Railway Fitter
    所在地:
    Wareham
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I wonder what would happen if Dorset Council stopped paying for gate keepers and just left the gates open, or even removed them? Back to how it used to be pre-gates?
     
  19. DcB

    DcB Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2018-06-05
    帖子:
    1,487
    支持:
    455
    所在地:
    Surrey
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Before the bypass in 1973 there used to be a proper road and passenger crossing with a working manned signal box.
     
  20. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    注册日期:
    2015-10-02
    帖子:
    7,914
    支持:
    6,646
    性别:
    所在地:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    The bottom of Page 24, top of Page 25 (of the NR risk assessment document) intrigued me with the reference to "a longer term strategy to introduce an additional metro service to Wareham".
    Maybe Leanne Ward knows something we do not.:rolleyes:
     

分享此页面