If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

92212

Dieses Thema im Forum 'Steam Traction' wurde von 05micfis gestartet, 16 Mai 2009.

Seite 5 von 5
  1. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    Registriert seit:
    1 September 2006
    Beiträge:
    3.083
    Zustimmungen:
    5.393
    Geschlecht:
    männlich
    Beruf:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    Ort:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Perhaps we should open a new thread here; I've never heard of a D numbered in the 92XXX series!
     
    LMS2968, 8 Juni 2009
    #81
  2. Impala

    Impala Member

    Registriert seit:
    20 April 2006
    Beiträge:
    639
    Zustimmungen:
    0
    Beruf:
    Project Manager
    Ort:
    Nuneaton
    Well, it was kind of relavent because they both have a flangeless driving axle.

    This reminds me that 92220 was under attack for a long time simply for having a flangeless axle. But John Peck successfully argued several times that because many civil engineers cranes also had a flangeless axle, disqualifying a 9F 2-10-0 for the same reason could not be justified. There was another issue raised about raised check rails. But again they fell out of favour, and such a thing is hard to find in the UK these days.
     
    Impala, 9 Juni 2009
    #82
  3. brit70000

    brit70000 Member

    Registriert seit:
    7 Juli 2007
    Beiträge:
    276
    Zustimmungen:
    33

    Getting back to the subject loco: It's boiler passed it's steam test today. =D> =D> =D>
     
    brit70000, 11 Juni 2009
    #83
Seite 5 von 5

Die Seite empfehlen