If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Bulleid Pacifics - Past or Present

Тема в разделе 'Steam Traction', создана пользователем 34007, 13 май 2008.

  1. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    17 июл 2007
    Сообщения:
    5.237
    Симпатии:
    8.711
    IR does have another Bulleid Pacific that he is involved with, namely 34007. I think that may be much more advanced than 35009 which has been on the back burner for some years.

    Peter
     
  2. DismalChips

    DismalChips Member

    Дата регистрации:
    11 апр 2016
    Сообщения:
    724
    Симпатии:
    757
    Адрес:
    9A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Doesn't that belong to someone else though? Doesn't seem a likely source of a borrowed tender.
     
  3. martin1656

    martin1656 Guest

    Regarding tenders, I did hear that 34007 might be exchanging tenders with another of SLL's stable, on account that it has a greater water capacity where as the one thats being worked on at Ropley is of a smaller capacity , SLL has build new tender chassis before, and it wouldn't be that hard to build a new one for 35009, along with a new tank, the wheel castings are availible, .
     
  4. DismalChips

    DismalChips Member

    Дата регистрации:
    11 апр 2016
    Сообщения:
    724
    Симпатии:
    757
    Адрес:
    9A
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I suppose there's potential for economies of scale as SLL will need to build tenders for Brocklebank, Sidmouth and Sir Fred. Although there again I suppose they could just rotate them as other locos come out of service. Four tenders across seven locos seems manageable.
     
  5. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    17 июл 2007
    Сообщения:
    5.237
    Симпатии:
    8.711
    I wasn't referring to tenders or ownership. The topic of this thread is Bulleid Pacifics and IR is currently doing a contract overhaul of 34007. I suggest that he is given time to finish that job before worrying about tenders for 35009. We haven't even had the MN livery discussion yet:).

    Peter
     
    Mick45305 и DismalChips нравится это.
  6. Mick45305

    Mick45305 Member

    Дата регистрации:
    26 мар 2013
    Сообщения:
    287
    Симпатии:
    631
    Адрес:
    Huddersfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    34007 is receiving 34072’s tender, according to the latest SLL news bulletin. 34072’s current tender has 5,500 gallons, whereas a new-build high-sided tender originally for use on 34007 is 4,500.
     
    misspentyouth62, The Gricing Owl, Johnme101 и ещё 1-му нравится это.
  7. JMJR1000

    JMJR1000 Member

    Дата регистрации:
    27 июл 2009
    Сообщения:
    846
    Симпатии:
    710
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Cleethorpes
    Indeed, thus allowing the SLL in turn to fulfil a long held desire to have at least one high-sided tender to pair with one of their two original 'spam cans', which I I have to say does best suit them in my opinion.
     
    CH 19, Johnme101, Mick45305 и ещё 1-му нравится это.
  8. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    2 окт 2015
    Сообщения:
    9.095
    Симпатии:
    7.751
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I picked up a copy of Colin Boocock's Locos of Nine Elms last week.
    There are 3 appendices listed in the back for loco allocations in 1950,1959 and 1965.
    The thing that interested me was all the Bulleid Light Pacifics allocated in August 1950 were Battle of Britain Class. Was this down to some predetermined strategy by BR to have only the BB's in London and the WC's down in the West Country or pure chance?
     
    Last edited: 4 сен 2025
    misspentyouth62 нравится это.
  9. misspentyouth62

    misspentyouth62 Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    8 ноя 2017
    Сообщения:
    2.077
    Симпатии:
    2.816
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    34D, now flexible
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    A good question although my 1959 Combined Vol has both allocated to 70A including WCs 34006/007/009/010/018/020/029/031/047/093/094/095 with only 3 BoBs 34064/065/090. I'm intrigued.
     
  10. Gladiator 5076

    Gladiator 5076 Resident of Nat Pres

    Дата регистрации:
    2 окт 2015
    Сообщения:
    9.095
    Симпатии:
    7.751
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Swanage
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes my typo I was talking about 1950, your list agrees with his data for 1959.
    I will correct my original post.
     
  11. 30567

    30567 Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    7 авг 2012
    Сообщения:
    6.417
    Симпатии:
    4.411
    https://sremg.org.uk/steam/blp-dat.shtml

    Have a look at this, scroll down to the second table. 34001-20 and 34041-7 started out at Exmouth Jn. 34021-32 started at Ramsgate while 34033-40 were at Stewarts Lane.

    In early 1950 according to Shed Bash UK 34022/3 were shedded at Nine Elms. It does look as though all of 34001-48 were outside London for a period in 1950 but from the attachment that didn't last long.
     
    Last edited: 4 сен 2025
  12. alexl102

    alexl102 Member Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    1 мар 2019
    Сообщения:
    723
    Симпатии:
    606
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    An update on the Ian Riley’s Facebook page re 35009 today.
    upload_2025-9-4_19-53-16.jpeg Oh
     
    Last edited: 4 сен 2025
    Bluenosejohn, Johnme101, MellishR и 6 другим нравится это.
  13. Steve

    Steve Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    7 окт 2006
    Сообщения:
    13.182
    Симпатии:
    13.007
    Род занятий:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Адрес:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    It’s in my memory bank that there’s a subtle difference between BB’s andWC’s with regard to the cabs which gave BB’s a better route availability for use over Brighton & SECR lines. I’m sure Tom or someone else can confirm or say it’s utter rubbish.
     
  14. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    25 авг 2007
    Сообщения:
    36.333
    Симпатии:
    23.240
    Род занятий:
    Training moles
    Адрес:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The Light Pacifics as built came with 8’ 6” cabs up to 34070 and 9’ cabs from 34071 onwards. Thus both original WCs and BBs came in both 8’6” and 9’ cab versions. All rebuilds had a 9’ cab.
     
    Steve, misspentyouth62, Johnb и 2 другим нравится это.
  15. Fred Kerr

    Fred Kerr Resident of Nat Pres Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    24 мар 2006
    Сообщения:
    8.564
    Симпатии:
    5.527
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Freelance photo - journalist
    Адрес:
    Southport
    Could that be because the WC / BB were initially built as a mixed traffic locomotive to replace some of the older life-expired designs - many of which were allocated to depots in the outer edges of the Southern Railway ?
     
  16. gz3xzf

    gz3xzf Member

    Дата регистрации:
    22 июл 2006
    Сообщения:
    332
    Симпатии:
    87
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Род занятий:
    Retired
    Адрес:
    21C142
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    If you want to be really "nerdy" about it you can see all the dates that the WC/BB were built/rebuilt and modified in this comprehensive table from the Bulleid Society: -
    LOCOMOTIVE SUMMARY 'WEST COUNTRY' AND 'BATTLE OF BRITAIN' CLASS
    At Swanage currently there are two original Light Pacific's running 34070 which was the last pacific built with an 8'6" cab and 34072 which was the second built with a 9' cab.
     
    The Gricing Owl, bristolian и misspentyouth62 нравится это.
  17. Spamcan81

    Spamcan81 Nat Pres stalwart

    Дата регистрации:
    25 авг 2007
    Сообщения:
    36.333
    Симпатии:
    23.240
    Род занятий:
    Training moles
    Адрес:
    The back of beyond
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I forgot to mention that although 34067 had an 8’6” cab throughout its working life, it was fitted with a 9’ cab when it went main line in the preservation era.
     
    gz3xzf нравится это.
  18. misspentyouth62

    misspentyouth62 Well-Known Member

    Дата регистрации:
    8 ноя 2017
    Сообщения:
    2.077
    Симпатии:
    2.816
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    34D, now flexible
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Confirming details from my 1950 locoshed now that I've found it : 70A had BoBs 34049-34065 and no WCs allocated at this time. (also MNs 35005 and 35010-35020)

    34067 was at Stewarts Lane in 1950
     
  19. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Дата регистрации:
    17 июл 2007
    Сообщения:
    5.237
    Симпатии:
    8.711
    A bit OT but it is Bulleid related - it is good to see that the Q1 is back in one piece and on display in the NRM again 20250902_211209 copy.jpg

    Peter
     
    gz3xzf, Mick45305, Bluenosejohn и 9 другим нравится это.
  20. Copper-capped

    Copper-capped Part of the furniture

    Дата регистрации:
    19 апр 2017
    Сообщения:
    3.929
    Симпатии:
    4.460
    Пол:
    Мужской
    Адрес:
    Stanthorpe, QLD, Australia
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Beauty and the beast….
     
    silversteellady, The Gricing Owl, MellishR и ещё 1-му нравится это.

Поделиться этой страницей