If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

RTC: Edinburgh Flyer - 04/04/26

Discussion in 'What's Going On' started by Enterprise, Mar 23, 2026.

  1. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    10,646
    Likes Received:
    10,843
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Let me frame it in a different way then , at 10A she is a fleet engine and an outlier versus the mainly Stanier fleet plus a more standard Merchant Navy . I presume there is not a dedicated 34067 support crew so operation and maintenance is done as part of the fleet . In comparison with other main line engines who have dedicated support crews who over time have knowledge of the nuances of the engine and its design , does 34067 suffer for this . From memory and I may be wrong but when at Southall she was looked after by John Bunch (correct me if I'm wrong) so maybe got some more specialist tlc as a result

    ** Just to clarify none of the above is in any way a criticism of those involved at 10A who have done so much to bring us 46115, 35018,45699,44932,48151 etc
     
  2. green five

    green five Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,932
    Likes Received:
    3,093
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Design Draughtsman
    Location:
    Hampshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    34067 was a brilliant performer and reliable in the early part of her preservation Main Line career. We always looked forward to a trip behind her on the ML as the performance could be quite spectacular and regularly headed out to see her many outings in the South. She was always a treat to watch working the VSOE Pullman's over the steeply graded Surrey Hills route.
    Then one day the problems gradually started to creep in. We noticed that the trips with her were often suffering from reliability problems. I remember on one of the Sunny South specials to Weymouth we had a blistering run down to the South Coast, one of the best we had with ML steam. However, the return run with the BoB was terrible. The crew couldn't get her to perform as she wouldn't make steam for some reason. The worst trip we had with her was the infamous Steam Dreams excursion to Lincoln. The Class 37 diesel on the back failed first. 34067 failed a bit later on with a hot box. We got home from that one at 2.30am the following day!
    There were a few others where she didn't run well at all. After that we had a sense of dread about booking any trips with 34067.
    It is sad that this once great performer seems to be plagued with problems most of the time now.
    Hopefully she might get back to performances like this one from 2011 (below) which is still one of my favourite shots that I have taken of ML steam:




    Sent from my XQ-BT52 using Tapatalk
     
  3. Enterprise

    Enterprise Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,773
    Likes Received:
    3,748
    My wife and I travelled behind her often back then. Some great runs, but for someone with many memories of BR steam out of Waterloo, all were evocative, especially as the coaches hadn't been tarted up much.
     
    silversteellady and green five like this.
  4. Rander

    Rander Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    122
    Since she emerged from overhaul in October 2021, by my count she has racked up 74 main line tours, not far off 20,000 miles including ECS, and the failure at Heaton is only the second "on the road" outright failure (after 21/09/24 on The Cumbrian Mountain Express at Kirkby Stephen) in that time.

    These are my own figures and the mileages are very approximate - very happy to be corrected if there's any failures I've missed!
     
  5. 2857Harry

    2857Harry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2023
    Messages:
    1,800
    Likes Received:
    4,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Conductor/Guard
    Location:
    Kidderminster/Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Failed on the Great Britain too at Joppa in 2025. Had to be dragged back to Carnforth.

    Failed on the Edinburgh Flyer in 2025 towards the end of the tour, and had to be dragged back to Carnforth with Rods off.

    Failed at Appleby on the CME as you rightly say in 2024, along with this 2026 Failure.
     
  6. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,573
    Likes Received:
    1,896
    Interestingly, not a single train hauled unassisted. That includes a period before the current 'coffin era too.
    So it might have done 20k miles but what work has it done? Granted the wheels have revolved, the motion moved etc but it hasn't exactly taken the strain, has it? That might be wise conservation given it is, uniquely for 10A, air braked.
     
    Sheff and 47406 like this.
  7. Rander

    Rander Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    122
    Wasn't counting the GB 2025 as I'd class that as failing "on shed" rather than on the road. Failing in such a way as to incur delay minutes.

    I was under the impression the rods-off drag in May 2025 was due to the fire risk.
     
  8. 2857Harry

    2857Harry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2023
    Messages:
    1,800
    Likes Received:
    4,084
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Conductor/Guard
    Location:
    Kidderminster/Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I mean it failed on the GB and had to be replaced by a diesel. That’s a failure of booked traction.
     

Share This Page