If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

6024 King Edward 1

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by Champion Lodge, Sep 16, 2024.

  1. Steve

    Steve Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    13,407
    Likes Received:
    13,664
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    There's no defined limit. It is usually considered that four is a sensible number on most locos but I can think of those where three is more realistic and others where five and even six can be on board without getting in the way. At the end of the day it is down to the inevitable risk assessment. On the NYMR it is four but an inspector can overrule this.
     
  2. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    10,687
    Likes Received:
    10,929
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    https://www.gov.uk/raib-reports/rep...at-aviemore-station-on-the-strathspey-railway

    One of the causal factors identified with the collision of 60103 at Aviemore .
    "At the time of the accident, there were six people in the cab of Flying Scotsman (paragraph 29). Rule 1.9 of the SRC Rule Book requires that the number of people in the cab of any locomotive is limited to four. Neither the apprentice fitter (paragraph 35) nor the GBRF driver (paragraph 36) played any role in the movement. To meet the requirements of the relevant operating rules and the agreement between Rileys and SRC (paragraph 28), operation of Flying Scotsman required (as a minimum) the presence of the driver, the fireman and the custodian’s representative."
     
  3. Jamessquared

    Jamessquared Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    29,081
    Likes Received:
    70,370
    Location:
    LBSC 215
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I think that is essentially confirming what @Steve said. In that paragraph, the RAIB isn't stating an externally-mandated limit; it is saying that the Strathspey Railway had defined a limit in its own rules (presumably having gone through a robust process to do so) but then had an incident in which a causal factor was that it had broken its own rule.

    That seems to me basically in line with how regulation works in this area: the regulators don't set generic limits, but they do want to see that (1) you have a robust process for managing risks and (2) having defined those risks, you follow your own procedures that thereby arise. So they won't mandate "you can only have four people on the footplate" but they will raise an eyebrow if your own rules say four, and you then have an incident in which five or more were present.

    I'm not a trained risk assessor, but I suspect in British practice, if you followed a robust risk assessment process, I can't think of any steam loco where you'd reach an opinion that 5 or more was safe, certainly not while hauling a train, and in some cases you may mandate fewer. (Some of our loco risk assessments only allow 3). Equally, I suspect 5 or 6 would be more acceptable on, say, some large US locos with much roomier cabs. Cab footage I've seen of the Big Boy seems to show 4 seats, and space to stand behind that. But not many Big Boys in the UK!

    Tom
     
    The Dainton Banker likes this.
  4. Steve

    Steve Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    13,407
    Likes Received:
    13,664
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    We tend to think in terms of steam but, on many diesel locos, five people can easily be accommodated; and I don't mean just main line ones. At Middleton last year we had a visit from two Railway inspectors and we took them up the line on a diesel shunter. There were five on the footplate, all sat down, and there was room for another sat and a couple standing well out of the way of the driver. We also have an ex BR Sentinel steam loco, probably the smallest ex BR steam loco there is and you can lose six people in that. At the other end of the spectrum, we have an ex LNER Y7 where the cab is so narrow, depending on your size, it is easier to get off and walk round if it's stationary and you want to get to the other side of the footplate so two is a sensible number as a third person stood in the middle tends to get toasted. We have a general rule of three on the footplate but it is flexible when needs arise at the Traffic Managers discretion; assessments being one occasion.
    Coming back to the Strathspey incident, I don't think the cab was overcrowded so much as those on board created a distraction and it was outside the rules. The LNER pacifics do have relatively large cabs and I'd be happy carrying five people in them.
     
  5. 5944

    5944 Resident of Nat Pres

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Messages:
    9,951
    Likes Received:
    11,858
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Train Maintainer for GTR at Hornsey
    Location:
    Letchworth
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    You can get a full mainline support crew on there if you use the corridor in the tender too. Allegedly...
     
  6. 30667

    30667 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2014
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    45
    Gender:
    Male
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    In June 1994, on an LCGB railtour there were 7 of us on the footplate of 4-8-4 P36 0050 from after the Ukrainian border formalities to Lviv, Lvov, Lwow, Lemberg (whichever you want to call it!). On the driver's side there were two seats side by side with the driver and pilot man. On the fireman's side there were two seats with two firemen(!) - one operating the injector and the other the mechanical stoker controls. A third fireman was in the tender pushing coal down into the mechanical stoker. I think there were 4 tip up seats attached to the front of the tender. I sat on one and a well known Bluebell driver sat on another. So in theory we could have had 8 people on the footplate all seated plus the fireman in the tender pushing the coal!!!
     
    Sheff likes this.
  7. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    5,364
    Likes Received:
    9,116
    That's all very well for the driver but makes life very difficult for the fireman. The driver stays in one place but the firemans job entails him moving about the cab, needing room to swing his shovel and also keep a good lookout from his side of the loco. That's not impossible with five people but it is not easy either.

    Peter
     
    Paul42, clinker, Sheff and 1 other person like this.
  8. Steve

    Steve Nat Pres stalwart Friend

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    13,407
    Likes Received:
    13,664
    Occupation:
    Gentleman of leisure, nowadays
    Location:
    Near Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    Do I take it that you don’t like giving up your seat to strangers, Peter?;)
     
    Sheff likes this.
  9. torgormaig

    torgormaig Part of the furniture Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    5,364
    Likes Received:
    9,116
    Seat? They are for the old codger known as the driver. Those of us at the coal face think the "fireman's seat" is where the footplate passenger goes to be out of the way - but when there are two people to occupy it it doesn't work very well:(. It's a hard life being a fireman:)

    Peter
     
    Steve likes this.

Share This Page