If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

The 10A Allocation

Discussion in 'Steam Traction' started by GWR4707, Apr 8, 2019.

  1. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,879
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    Indeed, as an example a Britannia and rebuilt Bulleid are both 75mph but the former has rollers, the latter plain whilst both have 6' 2" drivers and are Pacifics.
     
  2. 2857Harry

    2857Harry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2023
    Messages:
    1,918
    Likes Received:
    4,379
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Conductor/Guard
    Location:
    Kidderminster/Leeds
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    But you’ve read the magazine so you’ve read what it says. You don’t argue with some content but do with others :D
     
    Haighie likes this.
  3. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,879
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    Eh?
    I'm not arguing with the magazine report, I'm agreeing with the technical analysis others have made vis bearing/driving wheels differential on permitted max mph.
    As you said David Smith says 4767 can go faster because it has rollers and that's what the magazine reported. He obviously has a different understanding.
     
    green five, Andy Williams and LMS2968 like this.
  4. Johnb

    Johnb Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    16,476
    Likes Received:
    20,227
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired, best job I've ever had
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The criteria for 75mph running is driving wheels over 6’ 1” diameter, the fact they are Pacifics is irrelevant.
     
  5. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,879
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    Yes I know, I was simply pointing out John that there was no difference in max speed using 2 otherwise very similar designs, dimensionally where one has rollers and the other does not.
    The analogy being that black 5s are all 60mph so the addition of rollers to 4767 would not, in itself, seem to be why a higher max speed would be permitted.
    Having delved into the memory, didn't Bert get 5231 approved for 75mph or am I misremembering?
     
    class8mikado and LMS2968 like this.
  6. class8mikado

    class8mikado Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,982
    Likes Received:
    1,742
    Occupation:
    Print Estimator/ Repository of Useless Informatio.
    Location:
    Bingley W.Yorks.
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Its a bit of a daft system - neither example is mainline approved or likely to be - but a 9f would be limited to 50, A Beattie well tank or Dukedog good for 60....
     
  7. Mick45305

    Mick45305 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    645
    Location:
    Huddersfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    I seem to remember that was 5305, only for a brief period when it returned to the mainline in 2005.
     
  8. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,879
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    Thanks, we might be getting mixed up here as I think 5231 went mainline around 2005 but 45305 returned a bit later, maybe 2010?
    I also have some memory of Ian Riley stating he didn't think it was wise to have LMS 5s 'plated' for 75mph but again I can't remember quite where that anecdote entered my head
     
  9. GWR4707

    GWR4707 Nat Pres stalwart

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    19,654
    Likes Received:
    18,286
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Pictures on its Facebook page suggest that the chassis and wheels etc are progressing, plus possibly more significantly, when I passed the other week I noticed that its boiler which has been prominently stored outside and visible from the station for ages has vanished from that spot.
     
  10. Sidmouth

    Sidmouth Resident of Nat Pres Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    10,728
    Likes Received:
    11,013
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alderan !
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    I have a similar recollection . Concern was around extra wear and tear from memory
     
    26D_M likes this.
  11. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,879
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    It's why Stanier created the 5XP after all, longer legs and 3 pots for high speed.
     
  12. Mick45305

    Mick45305 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    645
    Location:
    Huddersfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    45305 did initially return to the mainline in 2005, mostly on runs by VT but then had the rough shunt at Loughborough the following year. It was 2010 when it re-entered service.
     
  13. 26D_M

    26D_M Part of the furniture

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,879
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    Thanks for putting me straight, so about the same time as 5231 was first certified under Bert Hitchen's ownership?
     
  14. Mick45305

    Mick45305 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    645
    Location:
    Huddersfield
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    No I do not currently volunteer
    Yes, seem to remember 45231 was a Steam Dreams regular during that time.
     

Share This Page