If you register, you can do a lot more. And become an active part of our growing community. You'll have access to hidden forums, and enjoy the ability of replying and starting conversations.

Tractive Effort conversion?

本贴由 tuffer55522009-08-05 发布. 版块名称: Steam Traction

  1. tuffer5552

    tuffer5552 Member

    注册日期:
    2006-09-04
    帖子:
    399
    支持:
    2
    Can tractive effort be converted into horse power? If it can then how do i do it? If it can't...why not?!

    Ta.
     
  2. Martin Perry

    Martin Perry Nat Pres stalwart Staff Member Moderator Friend

    注册日期:
    2006-04-15
    帖子:
    16,551
    支持:
    7,897
    所在地:
    1012 / 60158
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    If I remember correctly, TE is a measurement of Force, whereas HP is a measurement of Power (Force x Time); so there is another variable involved that does not make the relationship linear.
     
  3. LMS2968

    LMS2968 Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2006-09-01
    帖子:
    3,072
    支持:
    5,361
    性别:
    职业:
    Lecturer retired: Archivist of Stanier Mogul Fund
    所在地:
    Wigan
    Heritage Railway Volunteer:
    Yes I am an active volunteer
    The very short answer is Yes, since Power is, by definition, Force x Velocity. Tractive Effort is the force applied to the track to move the train in one direction or the other, so multiplying the TE by the speed does indeed give the horsepower. This is what was done with various tests in steam days, BUT the TE declines exponentially as speed rises, so you need to know what the actual TE is at the speed you choose. That was what the dynamometer car was for: to establish the TE, but it established it at the drawbar, not track, so the TE required to move the engine itself wasn't recorded and the power output would be underestimated. In fact, what was established was the Drawbar Horsepower, then an allowance was inserted for the gradient being climbed and the Equivalent Drawbar Horsepower estimated.

    But you can't just take the Nominal Tractive Effort as given in the Ian Allan ABC and deduce the horsepower from it. The Nominal TE, in any case, is merely a calculated figure and does not necessarily bear any relationshape to anything the engine could actually produce.
     
  4. Enterprise

    Enterprise Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2005-09-09
    帖子:
    5,472
    支持:
    3,302
    Unfortunately, this is not straightforward. To understand the relationships at a basic level one needs to have studied physics to A-level. This link then provides a useful summary:

    http://www.twoof.freeserve.co.uk/motion1.htm

    A more advanced outline can be found here: (opens Word doc)

    http://www.brightlemon.com/ma/what_use/TractiveEffortAccelerationAndBraking.doc

    Cheers
    Alan
     
  5. 22A

    22A Well-Known Member

    注册日期:
    2005-09-08
    帖子:
    1,105
    支持:
    99
    职业:
    Administrator
    所在地:
    Between 31F & 34E
    The OQ class Peckett 0-6-0ST (The Maerdy Monster) has a TE nearly as much as a Black 5, but the Peckett would never be used to haul The Pines Express.

    The OQ that did make it to preservation though is (presumably) more economic to operate than a Black 5 on a preserved line?
     
  6. Stu in Torbay

    Stu in Torbay Part of the furniture

    注册日期:
    2005-09-06
    帖子:
    2,829
    支持:
    42
    职业:
    GPS Navigation Engineer
    所在地:
    Goodrington Bank, Paignton
    Hence why you see "Starting Tractive Effort" quoted I.e. TE at speed = 0
     

分享此页面